LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v THE BARR FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and ALFRED E. BARR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-2179, Defendant: The Barr Financial Group, Inc. and Alfred E. Barr, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-2179, Respondents, Barr, Advisers Act, Commission, Investment Adviser, Securities, Proceeding, Future Violations, Injunction, Appeals, Staff, Barr Financial Group, Bfg, Commission Filings, Advisers Act Rule, Examination, False Statements, Enforcement, District Court, Exchange Commission, Associating, Management, Indiana University, Nasd, Transcript, Amendments, Management Services, Misconduct, Academic Credentials, Washington , ContentID: 120255929

Case Documents
1 2003-10-02 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 133219
17 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 17 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BARR
ADVISERS ACT
COMMISSION
INVESTMENT ADVISER
SECURITIES
PROCEEDING
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
INJUNCTION
APPEALS
STAFF
BARR FINANCIAL GROUP
BFG
COMMISSION FILINGS
ADVISERS ACT RULE
EXAMINATION
FALSE STATEMENTS
ENFORCEMENT
DISTRICT COURT
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ASSOCIATING
MANAGEMENT
INDIANA UNIVERSITY
NASD
TRANSCRIPT
AMENDMENTS
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
MISCONDUCT
ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS
WASHINGTON
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.

Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Rel. No. 2179 / October 2, 2003

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9918
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   THE BARR FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
   Tampa, Florida

   and

   ALFRED E. BARR
     _________________________________________________________________

   OPINION OF THE COMMISSION

   INVESTMENT ADVISER PROCEEDING
   CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDING

   False Statements in Commission Reports

   Injunction

   Investment adviser and its president made material false statements in
   Commission filings and were permanently enjoined from violating
   Section 204 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Advisers Act
   Rule 204-2. , it is in the public interest to order respondents to
   cease and desist from future violations of the provisions they were
   found to have violated, to revoke registration of investment adviser,
   and to bar its president from associating with any investment adviser.

   APPEARANCES

   , , and for the Barr Financial Group, Inc.

   , for the Division of Enforcement.

   Appeal filed July 10, 2002
   Last brief received October 28, 2002
   Oral Argument July 31, 2003

I.

SNIPPETS:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Washington, D.C.
  • THE BARR FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. Tampa, Florida
  • INVESTMENT ADVISER PROCEEDING CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDING
  • Investment adviser and its president made material false statements in Commission filings and
  • The law judge found that respondents willfully violated Section 207 of the Investment
  • The law judge ordered both respondents to cease and desist from committing or causing any
  • Respondents' 1999 injunction against violations of the Advisers Act followed an attempted
  • The attempted examination followed respondents' filing with the Commission of documents that
  • Barr acknowledged executing the Firm's Form ADV and each of the amendments to that form that
  • Shortly after this initial filing, however, the Advisers Act was amended to limit eligibility
  • On schedules attached to a Form ADV and amendments filed with the Commission in 1996, 1997,
  • On May 5, 1999, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
  • Issuance of this injunction followed a protracted, and unsuccessful, effort by the
  • A routine background check of the Firm and consultations with the NASD prior to the
  • The staff alsoreviewed a press account about a recent altercation Barr reportedly had with a
  • Whether or not Barr had some other academic credentials not identified in BFG's ADV filings
  • That account is roughly consistent with the academic transcript from Indiana University that
  • Respondents make a number of claims that represent charges of serious misconduct by our staff
  • Rule 204-2, which establishes recordkeeping requirements for investment advisers, provides
  • The circuit court order was affirmed by the Kentucky Court of Appeals, and Barr's appeal of
  •    |