LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v HAMILTON BANCORP, INC. ROBERT G. MAHONY, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 223, Defendant: Hamilton Bancorp, Inc. Robert G. Mahony, Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-10976, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>223, Bancorp, Exchange Act, Securities, Reports, Hamilton Bank, Commission, Pursuant, Motion, Party, Summary Disposition, Oip, Respondent, Practice, Annual Report, Quarterly Reports, Revoke, Matter, Thereunder, Review, Facts, Provisions, Petition, Administrative Law Judge, Oip Alleges, Receiver, Appointment, Contends, Filing, Periodic Reporting , ContentID: 120255923

Case Documents
1 2003-02-24 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 133213
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE ACT
SECURITIES
REPORTS
HAMILTON BANK
COMMISSION
PURSUANT
MOTION
PARTY
SUMMARY DISPOSITION
LAW
OIP
RESPONDENT
PRACTICE
ANNUAL REPORT
QUARTERLY REPORTS
REVOKE
MATTER
THEREUNDER
REVIEW
FACTS
PROVISIONS
PETITION
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
OIP ALLEGES
RECEIVER
APPOINTMENT
CONTENDS
FILING
PERIODIC REPORTING
Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge

Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.

                                         INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 223
                                                ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                                                         FILE NO. 3-10976

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                 Before the
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, D.C.
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   HAMILTON BANCORP, INC.
     _________________________________________________________________

   INITIAL DECISION

   February 24, 2003

   APPEARANCES Kerry A. Zinn for the Division of Enforcement, Securities
   and Exchange Commission.

   Bernardo Burstein for Respondent.
   BEFORE Robert G. Mahony, Administrative Law Judge

INTRODUCTION

Procedural Background

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) instituted this
   proceeding by an Order Instituting Proceeding (OIP) on December 16,
   2002, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   (Exchange Act) to determine whether Respondent Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.
   (Bancorp) failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and
   Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Bancorp filed its Answer on January
   10, 2003. A prehearing conference was held on January 27, 2003, during
   which the Division of Enforcement (Division) was granted leave to file
   a motion for summary disposition, pursuant to Rule 250 of the
   Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.250. On January 28,
   2003, the Division filed a Motion and Memo of Law in Support of Rule
   250 Summary Disposition Against Bancorp. Bancorp filed its Response on
   January 30, 2003.

Allegations and Arguments of the Parties
SNIPPETS:
  • Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge
  • Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.
  • APPEARANCES Kerry A. Zinn for the Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Bernardo Burstein for Respondent.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding by an Order Instituting
  • A prehearing conference was held on January 27, 2003, during which the Division of
  • On January 28, 2003, the Division filed a Motion and Memo of Law in Support of Rule 250
  • The OIP alleges that Bancorp failed to file an annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
  • the OIP alleges that Bancorp failed to comply with Section 13of the Exchange Act and Rules
  • Bancorp maintains that it was unable to file an annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
  • Bancorp further contends that the reasons cited above also prevented it from filing quarterly
  • Bancorp states that it does not have the staff or funds to perform the necessary financial
  • Bancorp contends that its failure to make the aforementioned filings has not caused harm to
  • Rule 250of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.250, provides that after a
  • The facts of the pleadings of the party against whom the motion is made shall be taken as
  • On January 11, 2002, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency closed down Hamilton Bank
  • Section 12of the Exchange Act authorizes the Commission to revoke the registration of a
  • This Order shall become effective in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Rule
  • a petition for review of this Initial Decision may be filed within twenty-one days after
  •    |