![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE ACT SECURITIES REPORTS HAMILTON BANK COMMISSION PURSUANT MOTION PARTY SUMMARY DISPOSITION LAW OIP RESPONDENT PRACTICE ANNUAL REPORT QUARTERLY REPORTS REVOKE MATTER THEREUNDER REVIEW FACTS PROVISIONS PETITION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE OIP ALLEGES RECEIVER APPOINTMENT CONTENDS FILING PERIODIC REPORTING |
Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge
Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.
INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 223
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
FILE NO. 3-10976
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
_________________________________________________________________
In the Matter of
HAMILTON BANCORP, INC.
_________________________________________________________________
INITIAL DECISION
February 24, 2003
APPEARANCES Kerry A. Zinn for the Division of Enforcement, Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Bernardo Burstein for Respondent.
BEFORE Robert G. Mahony, Administrative Law Judge
INTRODUCTION
Procedural Background
The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) instituted this
proceeding by an Order Instituting Proceeding (OIP) on December 16,
2002, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act) to determine whether Respondent Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.
(Bancorp) failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Bancorp filed its Answer on January
10, 2003. A prehearing conference was held on January 27, 2003, during
which the Division of Enforcement (Division) was granted leave to file
a motion for summary disposition, pursuant to Rule 250 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.250. On January 28,
2003, the Division filed a Motion and Memo of Law in Support of Rule
250 Summary Disposition Against Bancorp. Bancorp filed its Response on
January 30, 2003.
Allegations and Arguments of the Parties
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |