LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CLARKE T. BLIZZARD and RUDOLPH ABEL CAROL FOX FOELAK, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 229, Defendant: Clarke T. Blizzard and Rudolph Abel Carol Fox Foelak, Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-10007, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>229, Blizzard, Shawmut, Commissions, Investment Adviser, Abel, Violations, Brokers, Money, Respondent, Securities, Accounts, Sanctions, Management, East West, Roach, Client Referrals, Advisers Act, Administrative Law Judge, Antifraud Provisions, Rudolph Abel, Exchange Commission, Pension Fund, Allocation, Portfolio Manager, Cac, Soft Dollars, Arrangements, Ill-gotten Gains, Transactions, Recommendations , ContentID: 120255917

Case Documents
1 2003-06-13 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 133207
37 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 37 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SHAWMUT
COMMISSIONS
INVESTMENT ADVISER
ABEL
VIOLATIONS
BROKERS
MONEY
RESPONDENT
SECURITIES
ACCOUNTS
SANCTIONS
MANAGEMENT
EAST WEST
ROACH
CLIENT REFERRALS
ADVISERS ACT
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
RUDOLPH ABEL
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PENSION FUND
ALLOCATION
PORTFOLIO MANAGER
CAC
SOFT DOLLARS
ARRANGEMENTS
ILL-GOTTEN GAINS
TRANSACTIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge

Clarke T. Blizzard and Rudolph Abel

                                         INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 229
                                                ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                                                         FILE NO. 3-10007

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                 Before the
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   CLARKE T. BLIZZARD and
   RUDOLPH ABEL
     _________________________________________________________________

   INITIAL DECISION

   June 13, 2003

   APPEARANCES Linda B. Bridgman and Sandra J. Bailey for the Division of
   Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission

   Marc B. Dorfman and Adam J. Eisner of Foley & Lardner for Respondent
   Clarke T. Blizzard

   Respondent Rudolph Abel
   BEFORE Carol Fox Foelak, Administrative Law Judge

                                  SUMMARY

   This Initial Decision sanctions Clarke T. Blizzard, formerly
   associated with Shawmut Investment Advisers, Inc., for his role in
   marketing its money management services to Local 710 of the
   International Brotherhood of Teamsters. After concluding that Shawmut
   violated the antifraud provisions, and Blizzard aided and abetted the
   violations, the Initial Decision fines Blizzard $100,000, orders him
   to disgorge ill-gotten gains of $548,233, suspends him from
   association with an investment adviser for ninety days, and imposes a
   cease-and-desist order. The Initial Decision clears Rudolph Abel of
   all charges against him.

                              I. INTRODUCTION

                          A. Procedural Background
SNIPPETS:
  • Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge
  • Clarke T. Blizzard and Rudolph Abel
  • APPEARANCES Linda B. Bridgman and Sandra J. Bailey for the Division of Enforcement,
  • Respondent Rudolph Abel
  • This Initial Decision sanctions Clarke T. Blizzard, formerly associated with Shawmut
  • After concluding that Shawmut violated the antifraud provisions, and Blizzard aided and
  • The proceeding was authorized against Respondents Clarke T. Blizzard and Rudolph Abel
  • The OIP alleges that Clarke T. Blizzard and Rudolph Abel aided and abetted and caused
  • Shawmut allegedly violated those provisions because it failed to disclose to its clients that
  • The "Local 710" allegations concern arrangements by which Shawmut obtained accounts from the
  • The OIP alleges that Shawmut, its predecessor, and successor employed Blizzard as vice
  • In a separate course of alleged wrongdoing, the OIP alleges that Blizzard arranged with
  • The Division requests that Blizzard be barred from association with an investment adviser and
  • Second, "chits" allowed an analyst or portfolio manager to recognize, on a one-time basis, a
  • All those inputs were merged into a budget and fine-tuned by a Commission Allocation
  • Blizzard said that Fleet was threatening his family's livelihood, that Fleet had created a
  • Robinson's recollection of what Blizzard said about his dealings with Roach and Local 710
  • These included accounts of the Retirement Board of the Employees Retirement System,
  • The board involved Callan Associates in its 1994 search for a money manager for a small cap
  •    |