LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JOHN CHRISTOPHER MCCAMEY and SIERRA EQUITY PARTNERS, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 230, Defendant: John Christopher McCamey and Sierra Equity Partners, LP Robert G. Mahony, Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-10911, Plaintiff: SEC, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: SEC>230, Sierra Equity, Exchange Act, Mccamey, Securities Act, Commission, Laws, Respondents, Oip, Violations, Pursuant, Sierra Equity Partners, Alleges, John Christopher Mccamey, Investors, Investment, Cir, Administrative Law Judge, Sierra Brokerage, False Statements, Limited Partnership, Omissions, Civil Monetary Penalty, Material Fact, Sanctions, Misleading, Future Violations, Provisions, Mcallister, Enforcement, Order Instituting Proceedings , ContentID: 120255916

Case Documents
1 2003-06-17 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 133206
11 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 11 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE ACT
MCCAMEY
SECURITIES ACT
COMMISSION
LAWS
RESPONDENTS
OIP
VIOLATIONS
PURSUANT
SIERRA EQUITY PARTNERS
ALLEGES
JOHN CHRISTOPHER MCCAMEY
INVESTORS
INVESTMENT
CIR
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
SIERRA BROKERAGE
FALSE STATEMENTS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OMISSIONS
CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY
MATERIAL FACT
SANCTIONS
MISLEADING
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
PROVISIONS
MCALLISTER
ENFORCEMENT
ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge

John Christopher McCamey and Sierra Equity Partners, LP

                                         INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 230
                                                ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                                                         FILE NO. 3-10911

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                 Before the
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C. 20549
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   JOHN CHRISTOPHER McCAMEY
   and SIERRA EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
     _________________________________________________________________

   INITIAL DECISION

   June 17, 2003

   APPEARANCES

   Kent W. McAllister, for the Division of Enforcement,
   Securities and Exchange Commission

   John Christopher McCamey, , and for Sierra Equity Partners, LP
   BEFORE      Robert G. Mahony, Administrative Law Judge

INTRODUCTION

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) issued an Order
   Instituting Proceedings (OIP) on October 8, 2002, against Respondents
   John Christopher McCamey (McCamey) and Sierra Equity Partners, LP,
   (Sierra Equity) pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933
   (Securities Act) and Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange
   Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

   The OIP alleges that McCamey and Sierra Equity willfully violated
   Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange
   Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The OIP further alleges that McCamey
   and Sierra Equity willfully violated and committed violations of
   Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act by failing to register
   with the Commission the offering of limited partnership interests in
   Sierra Equity when no exemption to registration applied. The OIP
SNIPPETS:
  • Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge
  • John Christopher McCamey and Sierra Equity Partners,
  • Kent W. McAllister, for the Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission issued an Order Instituting Proceedings on October 8,
  • The OIP alleges that McCamey and Sierra Equity willfully violated Section 17of the Securities
  • The OIP further alleges that McCamey and Sierra Equity willfully violated and committed
  • The OIP further alleges that McCamey willfully aided and abetted and caused Sierra Brokerage
  • The Respondents filed their Answers on October 23,
  • The Division has filed a brief in support of the sanctions it seeks.
  • McCamey maintained complete control over Sierra Asset, through which he had exclusive control
  • Investors in Sierra Equity were to be limited partners with no voice in its operations,
  • Thereafter, in November and December 2001, McCamey and Sierra Equity made false and
  • Section 17of the Securities Act prohibits any person from using, directly or indirectly, the
  • , 553 F.2d 1033, 1045 (7th Cir.
  • The jurisdictional clauses under the antifraud provisions are given broad interpretation and
  • McCamey and Sierra Equity also made material omissions by failing to disclose that the
  • These false statements and omissions are material since a reasonable investor would consider
  • For aiding and abetting liability to attach under the federal securities laws, three elements
  • he egregiousness of the defendant's actions; the isolated or recurrent nature of the
  • Section 21B of the Exchange Act authorizes the Commission to impose a civil monetary penalty
  •    |