![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACT SECURITIES PROCEEDING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE EXCHANGE DISGORGEMENT PREJUDGMENT PURSUANT JUDGEMENT PRACTICE POSTJUDGMENT VIOLATIONS PAY ALACAN CIVIL PENALTY RESPONDENT ENFORCEMENT DISTRICT COURT DISGORGEMENT AWARDS UNITED STATES CALCULATION FINANCIAL SANCTIONS PENALTIES FEDERAL COURT MATERIAL FACT UNDERPAYMENT RATE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE COMPOUNDING COLLECTABILITY |
Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge
J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., John A. Bruno, Michael J. Wills, Edgar B. Alacan,
Emmanuel P. Cube, Mayer Dallal, Danoo Noor, Sr., Emanuele A. Scarso, Michael
B. Scott
INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 233
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
FILE NO. 3-10765
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
_________________________________________________________________
In the Matter of
J.W. BARCLAY & CO., INC.
JOHN A. BRUNO
MICHAEL J. WILLS
EDGAR B. ALACAN
EMMANUEL P. CUBE
MAYER DALLAL
DANOO NOOR, SR.
EMANUELE A. SCARSO
MICHAEL B. SCOTT
_________________________________________________________________
INITIAL DECISION AS TO
MAYER DALLAL
July 23, 2003
APPEARANCES Joy M. Boddie, Charles J. Kerstetter, and Kathryn A.
Pyszka for the Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Mayer Dallal, pro se.
BEFORE James T. Kelly, Administrative Law Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission or SEC) instituted
this proceeding against Mayer Dallal (Dallal) and others on April 24,
2002, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities
Act) and Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act). Dallal filed a timely answer. I held four days of
hearings during March and April 2003 in New York City.
At a telephonic prehearing conference on March 19, 2003, the
Commission's Division of Enforcement (Division) and Dallal announced
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |