LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JAMES F. GLAZA D/B/A FALCON FINANCIAL SERVICES, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 235, Defendant: James F. Glaza d/b/a Falcon Financial Services, Inc. Robert G. Mahony, Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-11012, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>235, Glaza, Securities Act, Exchange Act, Commission, Registered Representatives, Online, Stock, Pursuant, James, Stips, Investors, Violations, Respondent, Administrative Law Judge, Falcon Financial Services, Oip Alleges, Relevant Period, Stock Price, Projections, Future Violations, Civil Monetary Penalty, United States, Stipulations, Potential Customer, Penny Stock, Disgorgement, Enforcement, Order Instituting Proceedings, Nasdaq Listing , ContentID: 120255911

Case Documents
1 2003-09-08 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 133201
15 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 15 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES ACT
EXCHANGE ACT
COMMISSION
REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES
ONLINE
LAW
STOCK
PURSUANT
JAMES
STIPS
INVESTORS
VIOLATIONS
RESPONDENT
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FALCON FINANCIAL SERVICES
OIP ALLEGES
RELEVANT PERIOD
STOCK PRICE
PROJECTIONS
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY
UNITED STATES
STIPULATIONS
POTENTIAL CUSTOMER
PENNY STOCK
DISGORGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
NASDAQ LISTING
Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge

James F. Glaza

                                         INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 235
                                                ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                                                         FILE NO. 3-11012

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                 Before the
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   JAMES F. GLAZA,
   D/B/A FALCON FINANCIAL
   SERVICES, INC.
     _________________________________________________________________

   INITIAL DECISION

   September 8, 2003

   APPEARANCES Polly A. Atkinson and Thomas D. Carter for the Division of
   Enforcement,
   United States Securities and Exchange Commission

   Walter J. Baumgardner for Respondent James F. Glaza d/b/a Falcon
   Financial Services, Inc.
   BEFORE Robert G. Mahony, Administrative Law Judge

INTRODUCTION

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) issued an Order
   Instituting Proceedings (OIP) on January 21, 2003, against Respondent
   James F. Glaza d/b/a Falcon Financial Services, Inc. (Glaza), pursuant
   to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and
   Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   (Exchange Act). The OIP alleges that Glaza, as a registered
   representative, willfully violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of
   the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule
   10b-5 thereunder, in connection with the offer, purchase, and sale of
   shares of OnLine Power Supply, Inc., a Nevada corporation (OnLine or
   the Company), during the period from approximately August 1999 to
   approximately May 2000 (relevant period).

   Glaza filed his Answer to the OIP on April 2, 2003. The Division of
SNIPPETS:
  • Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge
  • JAMES F. GLAZA, D/B/A FALCON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Walter J. Baumgardner for Respondent James F. Glaza d/b/a Falcon Financial Services,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission issued an Order Instituting Proceedings on January 21,
  • The OIP alleges that Glaza, as a registered representative, willfully violated Sections 5, 5,
  • The Division of Enforcement and Glaza filed Stipulations of Fact and Conclusions of Law on
  • Glaza does not oppose the entry of an order, based on these Stipulations, that orders him to
  • (Stips.
  • During the relevant period, OnLine's stock was a penny stock and was quoted on the National
  • Glaza was one of several registered representatives selling OnLine stock pursuant to a sales
  • Glaza sold over 8.6 million shares of OnLine in three penny stock offerings that were offered
  • Glaza made stock price and earnings projections to existing and potential investors that had
  • Budinger had no knowledge of the bases for Glaza's statements regarding potential customer
  • OnLine, however, never applied for a NASDAQ listing, and no one represented to Glaza that the
  • The OIP alleges that Glaza willfully violated Sections 5and 5of the Securities Act by selling
  • Disgorgement and Prejudgment Interest
  • Section 8Aof the Securities Act and Sections 21Band 21Cof the Exchange Act authorize an order
  •    |