LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v RAYLEN PARRA Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-47343, Defendant: Raylen Parra, Plaintiff: SEC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-47343, Parra, Securities, Exchange Act, Administrative Proceedings, Public Companies, Exchange Commission, Alleges, Stock, United States Securities, Instituting, Raylen Parra, Florida, Permanent, Executives, Broker Relations, Allegations, Investment Community, Over-the-counter Bulletin Board, Touting, Principals, Reaped Illegal Profits, Engaging, Practice, Scalping, Selling, Simultaneously Recommending, Purchase, Administrative Law Judge, Dispute, Remedial Sanctions , ContentID: 120255868

Case Documents
1 2003-02-11 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 133158
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
PUBLIC COMPANIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ALLEGES
STOCK
UNITED STATES SECURITIES
INSTITUTING
RAYLEN PARRA
FLORIDA
PERMANENT
EXECUTIVES
BROKER RELATIONS
ALLEGATIONS
INVESTMENT COMMUNITY
OVER-THE-COUNTER BULLETIN BOARD
TOUTING
PRINCIPALS
REAPED ILLEGAL PROFITS
ENGAGING
PRACTICE
SCALPING
SELLING
SIMULTANEOUSLY RECOMMENDING
PURCHASE
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
DISPUTE
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
Release No. 47343 / February 11, 2003

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-11041

         ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST RAYLEN PARRA

   The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission)
   announced today that it has entered an Order Instituting
   Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) against Raylen Parra (Parra) of
   Orlando, Florida, based on the entry of a Default Judgment of
   Permanent Injunction entered against her on September 13, 2002,
   permanently enjoining her from further violations of Sections 17(a)
   and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), Section
   10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

   The Order alleges that Parra was the president and chief executive
   officer of Norrstar Advertising, Inc., a now defunct broker relations
   firm formerly located in Daytona Beach, Florida. The Order also
   alleges that during the period from approximately September 1998 to
   September 1999, Norrstar's staff of "broker relations executives" at
   the direction of Parra, disseminated false and misleading information
   to the investment community concerning the stock of at least five
   public companies quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. The
   Order further alleges, among other things, that while touting the
   stock of the public companies, Norrstar's principals, including Parra,
   reaped illegal profits of more than $3.4 million by engaging in the
   practice of "scalping" -- selling the stock of public companies they
   were simultaneously recommending to others to purchase.

   A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to
   determine whether the allegations contained in the Order are true, to
   provide Parra an opportunity to dispute these allegations, and to
   determine what remedial sanctions if any, are appropriate and in the
   public interest.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 02/13/2003
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST RAYLEN PARRA
  • The United States Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it has entered an thereunder.
  • The Order alleges that Parra was the president and chief executive officer of Norrstar
  • The Order also alleges that during the period from approximately September 1998 to September
  • The Order further alleges, among other things, that while touting the stock of the public
  • A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to determine whether the
  •    |