LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v XAIBE, INC. and LOWELL NICHOLAS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-48467, Defendant: Xaibe, Inc. and Lowell Nicholas, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-48467, Xaibe, Nicholas, Respondent Xaibe, Exchange Act, Report, Commission, Oip, Auditing Firm, Audit, Securities Exchange Act, Proceeding, Stock, Pursuant, Failure, Financial Statements, Thereunder, Materially False, Misleading, Independent Auditing Firm, Filing, Provisions, Resigning, Lowell Nicholas, Sanction, Certified Mail, Chief, Officer, Prehearing Conference, Failing, Common Stock , ContentID: 120255637

Case Documents
1 2003-09-10 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132927
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
NICHOLAS
RESPONDENT XAIBE
EXCHANGE ACT
REPORT
COMMISSION
OIP
AUDITING FIRM
AUDIT
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
PROCEEDING
STOCK
PURSUANT
FAILURE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THEREUNDER
MATERIALLY FALSE
MISLEADING
INDEPENDENT AUDITING FIRM
FILING
PROVISIONS
RESIGNING
LOWELL NICHOLAS
SANCTION
CERTIFIED MAIL
CHIEF
OFFICER
PREHEARING CONFERENCE
FAILING
COMMON STOCK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 48467 / September 10, 2003

Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-11182
     _________________________________________________________________


   In the Matter of

   XAIBE, INC. and
   LOWELL NICHOLAS,
   Respondent

     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING SANCTION BY DEFAULT AGAINST XAIBE,
   INC.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) initiated this
   proceeding on July 16, 2003, with an Order Instituting Proceedings
   (OIP). On August 18, 2003, the Commission accepted an Offer of
   Settlement from Respondent Lowell Nicholas (Nicholas).

   On July 22, 2003, Respondent Xaibe, Inc. (Xaibe), was served with the
   OIP by certified mail on Respondent Nicholas's counsel. Respondent
   Nicholas is the director and chief executive officer (CEO) of Xaibe.
   17 C.F.R. §§ 201.141, .150. Additionally, Respondent Xaibe was served
   with the OIP via certified mail on August 19, 2003. As of September
   10, 2003, Respondent Xaibe has failed to file an answer, due within
   twenty days after service of the OIP. 17 C.F.R. § 201.220. Xaibe also
   failed to appear at the telephonic prehearing conference held on
   August 19, 2003. On August 20, 2003, the Division of Enforcement
   (Division) filed a motion for default against Respondent Xaibe. In a
   separate Order issued on August 21, 2003, I ordered Respondent Xaibe
   to show cause, on or by September 5, 2003, why it should not be held
   in default and why the registration of its stock should not be revoked
   pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   (Exhange Act).

   Respondent Xaibe has failed to show cause why it should not be held in
   default. Pursuant to Rules 155(a) and 220(f) of the Commission's Rules
   of Practice, 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f), Respondent Xaibe is in
   default for failing to file an answer to the OIP within twenty days
SNIPPETS:
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING SANCTION BY DEFAULT AGAINST XAIBE,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission initiated this proceeding on July 16, 2003, with an
  • On August 18, 2003, the Commission accepted an Offer of Settlement from Respondent Lowell
  • On July 22, 2003, Respondent Xaibe, Inc., was served with the OIP by certified mail on
  • Xaibe also failed to appear at the telephonic prehearing conference held on August 19,
  • In a separate Order issued on August 21, 2003, I ordered Respondent Xaibe to show cause, on
  • Pursuant to Rules 155and 220of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155,
  • Nicholas, a resident of Sherwood, Arkansas, was appointed chief operating officer and
  • The Form 10-KSB filed by Nicholas was materially false and misleading because it purported to
  • At the time Nicholas caused Xaibe to file the Form 10-KSB, Xaibe's independent auditing firm
  • By filing the materially false and misleading Form 10-KSB, Xaibe failed to comply with
  • Nicholas was a cause of Xaibe's failure to comply with these provisions.
  • The auditing firm thereafter sent a letter to Xaibe resigning from the engagement, but Xaibe
  • Xaibe thereby failed to comply with, and Nicholas was a cause of Xaibe's failure to comply
  • On the basis of the foregoing, it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of
  • IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that the
  •    |