LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CYRUS INDUSTRIES, INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-48523, Defendant: Cyrus Industries, Inc., Plaintiff: SEC, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-48523, Exchange Act, Cyrus, Reports, Oip, Common Stock, Securities, Commission, Proceeding, Pursuant, Quarterly Reports, Violations, Investors, Cyrus Industries, Administrative Law Judge, Sanction, Accurate Financial Information, Congress, Washington, Respondent, Findings, Revokes, Revocation, Periodic Reports, Failing, Protection, Cir, Docket, Commission Precedent, Sanction Considerations Set, Corporations Violated Exchange , ContentID: 120255616

Case Documents
1 2003-09-23 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132906
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CYRUS
REPORTS
OIP
COMMON STOCK
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
PROCEEDING
PURSUANT
QUARTERLY REPORTS
VIOLATIONS
INVESTORS
CYRUS INDUSTRIES
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
SANCTION
ACCURATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONGRESS
WASHINGTON
RESPONDENT
FINDINGS
REVOKES
REVOCATION
PERIODIC REPORTS
FAILING
PROTECTION
CIR
DOCKET
COMMISSION PRECEDENT
SANCTION CONSIDERATIONS SET
CORPORATIONS VIOLATED EXCHANGE
United States of America
before the
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 48523 / September 23, 2003

Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-11221
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   CYRUS INDUSTRIES, INC.

   Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND REVOKING REGISTRATION BY DEFAULT

SUMMARY

   This Order revokes the registration of the common stock of Cyrus
   Industries, Inc. (Cyrus). The revocation is based on Cyrus's repeated
   failure to file required periodic reports with the Securities and
   Exchange Commission (Commission).

I. BACKGROUND

   The Commission initiated this proceeding on August 14, 2003, with an
   Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Section 12(j) of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The OIP alleges that
   Cyrus's common stock was registered under Section 12(g) of the
   Exchange Act in 2000, and that Cyrus failed to file required annual
   and quarterly reports since then. Cyrus was served with the OIP on
   August 29, 2003. Cyrus failed to file an answer, due on September 22.
   A Respondent that fails to file an answer to the OIP may be deemed to
   be in default, and the administrative law judge may determine the
   proceeding against it. 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f). Thus, Cyrus
   is in default, and the undersigned finds that the allegations in the
   OIP are true.

II. FINDINGS OF FACT

   Cyrus registered its common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
   Exchange Act on Form 10-SB on June 22, 2000. The registration became
   effective on August 21, 2000. Since that date Cyrus has not filed any
SNIPPETS:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND REVOKING REGISTRATION BY DEFAULT
  • This Order revokes the registration of the common stock of Cyrus Industries,
  • The revocation is based on Cyrus's repeated failure to file required periodic reports with
  • The Commission initiated this proceeding on August 14, 2003, with an Order Instituting
  • The OIP alleges that Cyrus's common stock was registered under Section 12of the Exchange Act
  • A Respondent that fails to file an answer to the OIP may be deemed to be in default, and the
  • By failing to file required annual and quarterly reports, Cyrus violated Exchange Act Section
  • Revocation of the registration of Cyrus's common stock will serve the public interest and the
  • It accords with Commission precedent and sanction considerations set forth in, 603 F.2d 1126,
  • and with the sanctions imposed in similar cases in which corporations violated Exchange Act
  • 79 SEC Docket 2680 (A.L.J.
  • The reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is the primary tool which
  • Cyrus's violations were recurrent, egregious, and deprived the investing public of current
  • However, the Commission's Washington, D.C., Headquarters offices were closed on Thursday,
  •    |