LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CHARLES BAYNE A/K/A CHARLES TAYLOR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-48535, Defendant: Charles Bayne a/k/a Charles Taylor, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-48535, Respondent, Commission, Exchange, Exchange Act, Securities, Proceeding, Pursuant, Administrative Proceeding, Charles, Instituting, Findings, Basis, Pre-ipo, Intellect Exchange, Medical Online, Shares, United States, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Hereby, Limited Liability Company, California, Complaint, Alleges, Admitting, Consents, Nevada, Civil Action, District, Acting, Sales , ContentID: 120255615

Case Documents
1 2003-09-24 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132905
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE
EXCHANGE ACT
SECURITIES
PROCEEDING
PURSUANT
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
CHARLES
INSTITUTING
FINDINGS
BASIS
PRE-IPO
INTELLECT EXCHANGE
MEDICAL ONLINE
SHARES
UNITED STATES
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
HEREBY
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
CALIFORNIA
COMPLAINT
ALLEGES
ADMITTING
CONSENTS
NEVADA
CIVIL ACTION
DISTRICT
ACTING
SALES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 48535 / September 24, 2003

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-11266
     _________________________________________________________________


   In the Matter of

   CHARLES BAYNE a/k/a
   CHARLES TAYLOR,
   Respondent.

     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTION
   15(b)(6) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

                                     I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that a public administrative
   proceeding be, and hereby is, instituted pursuant to Section 15(b)(6)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against
   Charles Bayne a/k/a Charles Taylor ("Respondent").

                                    II.

   In anticipation of the institution of this proceeding, Respondent has
   submitted an Offer of Settlement (the "Offer") that the Commission has
   determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and
   any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to
   which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the
   findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over him
   and the subject matter of this proceeding, and the findings contained
   in Section III.2 below, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the
   entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceeding Pursuant To
   Section 15(b)(6) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934, Making
   Findings, And Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order"), as set forth
   below.

                                    III.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • CHARLES TAYLOR,
  • ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTION
  • 15OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that a
  • In anticipation of the institution of this proceeding, Respondent has submitted an Offer of
  • Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of Exchange Act Of 1934, Making
  • Findings, And Imposing Remedial Sanctions, as set forth below.
  • On the basis of this Order and Respondent's Offer,
  • Respondent was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Pre-IPO Financial Group, LLC, a
  • Respondent was a 50% owner of Pre-IPO.
  • Respondent, age 47, resides in Glendale, California.
  • On September 18, 2003, a final judgment was entered against Respondent, pursuant to his
  • District Court for the Central District of California.
  • The Commission's complaint alleges that Respondent, acting with and through Pre-IPO and its
  • The Commission's complaint further alleges that Respondent purchased shares from Intellect
  • Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED
  •    |