LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v REMMINGTON ADVISORS, INC. and KENNETH RANDALL WARD Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-2177, Defendant: Remmington Advisors, Inc. and Kenneth Randall Ward, Plaintiff: SEC, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-2177, Act, Ward, Securities, Commission, Investment Advisers, Exchange, Administrative Proceeding, Remmington, Remmington Advisors, Kenneth, Randall Ward, Willful Violations, Sale, Sanctions, Barring, Allegations, Inverse Floater Mortgage, Texas Municipalities, Admin, Proc, Commission Imposed Sanctions, Permanently Barring, Broker, Dealer, Threat, Callous Willingness, Personal Benefit, Regard, Administrative Law Judge, Dispute , ContentID: 120255605

Case Documents
1 2003-09-26 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132895
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WARD
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
INVESTMENT ADVISERS
EXCHANGE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
REMMINGTON
REMMINGTON ADVISORS
KENNETH
RANDALL WARD
WILLFUL VIOLATIONS
SALE
SANCTIONS
BARRING
ALLEGATIONS
INVERSE FLOATER MORTGAGE
TEXAS MUNICIPALITIES
ADMIN
PROC
COMMISSION IMPOSED SANCTIONS
PERMANENTLY BARRING
BROKER
DEALER
THREAT
CALLOUS WILLINGNESS
PERSONAL BENEFIT
REGARD
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
DISPUTE
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
   Release. No. 2177 / September 26, 2003

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-11276

   Proceedings Instituted against Remmington Advisors, Inc. and Kenneth
   Randall Ward

   The Commission instituted administrative proceedings pursuant to
   Sections 203(e) and 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
   ("Advisers Act") against Remmington Advisors, Inc. ("Remmington"), a
   registered investment adviser, and Kenneth Randall Ward ("Ward"),
   Remmington's principal. The administrative proceeding seeks to
   determine whether remedial action against Remmington and Ward is in
   the public interest, based on Ward's willful violations of Section
   17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Section
   10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").

   The Division of Enforcement alleges that, on March 19, 2003, the
   Commission issued an opinion concluding that Ward committed willful
   violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and
   Exchange Act through the offer and sale, and in connection with the
   purchase and sale, of inverse floater mortgage derivative securities
   to two Texas municipalities. Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9327, Release No.
   (March 19, 2003). The Commission imposed sanctions on Ward in the
   public interest, including permanently barring him from association
   with any broker or dealer. In barring Ward, the Commission stated that
   Ward "represents a threat to the investing public" and his actions
   "demonstrate a callous willingness to exploit, for personal benefit
   and without regard for the impact on others, the trust placed in him
   by investors . . . ."

   A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to
   determine whether the allegations contained in the Order are true, to
   provide Remmington and Ward an opportunity to dispute the allegations,
   and to determine what, if any, remedial sanctions are appropriate in
   the public interest.

     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 09/30/2003
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Proceedings Instituted against Remmington Advisors, Inc. and Kenneth Randall Ward
  • The Commission instituted administrative proceedings pursuant to Sections 203and 203of the
  • The administrative proceeding seeks to determine whether remedial action against Remmington
  • The Division of Enforcement alleges that, on March 19, 2003, the Commission issued an opinion
  • Admin.
  • Proc.
  • The Commission imposed sanctions on Ward in the public interest, including permanently
  • In barring Ward, the Commission stated that Ward "represents a threat to the investing
  • A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to determine whether the
  •    |