![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PEREGRINE REVENUE RECEIVABLES SENIOR OFFICERS COMPLAINT FINANCING FRAUD ACCOUNTING EXCHANGE ACT CIVIL SECURITIES RECORDING VIOLATING COMMISSION ALLEGES SCHEME ACCORDING NON-BINDING CUSTOMERS CHANNEL PARTNERS REVENUE RECOGNITION BALANCE SHEET SENIOR TREASURY MANAGER BANKS SOLD CONTRACTS RECKLESS KNOWING UNPAID RECEIVABLES |
Litigation Release Matthew C. Gless Litigation Release No. 18093 / April 16, 2003 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1759 /April 16, 2003 , Civil Action No. 03 CV 0747 W (LAB) (S.D. Cal.) (April 16, 2003) SEC Charges Former Peregrine CFO with Financial Fraud The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed civil fraud charges against Matthew C. Gless, the former Chief Financial Officer at San Diego-based software company Peregrine Systems, Inc., for his participation in an eleven-quarter financial fraud at the company. The complaint alleges that Gless and other Peregrine senior officers engaged in deceptive practices to artificially inflate Peregrine's revenue and stock price, and that Gless then took fraudulent action to conceal the scheme. According to the complaint, the heart of the fraud was the recording of millions of dollars of revenue despite non-binding arrangements with customers, in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). At the ends of fiscal quarters, Gless schemed with other Peregrine senior officers about ways to arrange non-binding transactions with resellers (known as channel partners) and record them as revenue, so that Peregrine could meet or exceed quarterly revenue projections. Peregrine senior officers then purported to sell Peregrine's software to channel partners, even though the channel partners' obligations to Peregrine were frequently contingent or subject to other terms that made revenue recognition improper. Gless knew that senior officers were secretly adding material sale contingencies-by oral or written side agreement-to what appeared on their face to be binding contracts. Gless also knew that senior officers were using other gimmickry to inflate the company's revenue. The complaint further alleges that, to conceal the revenue recognition scheme, Gless abused the receivable financing process. When Peregrine booked the non-binding contracts, and the customers predictably did not pay, the receivables ballooned on Peregrine's balance sheet. To make it appear that Peregrine was collecting its receivables more quickly than it was, Gless directed Peregrine's senior treasury manager to sell receivables to banks and then remove them from the company's balance sheet. There were several problems with this. First, Gless knew, or was reckless in not knowing, that because Peregrine had given the banks recourse and frequently paid or repurchased unpaid receivables from them, Peregrine should have accounted for the bank transactions as loans and left the receivables on its balance sheet.SNIPPETS: |
| | | |