U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 18094 / April 18, 2003
SEC FILES CHARGES AGAINST PHILIP R. GRATZ FOR VIOLATING AN
ADMINISTRATIVE BAR AND FOR ACTING AS AN UNREGISTERED BROKER DEALER
, Case No. 03-20889-CIV-SEITZ/BANDSTRA (S.D. Fla., April 15, 2003).
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that on April
15, 2003, it filed a complaint with the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida against Philip R. Gratz
("Gratz"), a New Jersey resident and former stock broker, charging
with him violating an SEC administrative bar previously imposed
against him by consent and for violating the broker-dealer
registration provisions of the federal securities laws. According to
the SEC's complaint, from at least November 1998 until March 20, 2003,
Gratz, doing business as Phoenix World Wide Enterprises, Inc. raised
more than $8.9 million from investors by, among other things, falsely
promising that he would invest their funds in the stock market. The
SEC's complaint alleges that, contrary to Gratz's promises, $3.02
million in investor funds were misappropriated for his personal use.
The complaint also alleges that in connection with his fraudulent
misconduct, Gratz received transaction related compensation for
providing investment advice and for inducing the purchase or sales of
securities while not registered with the SEC as a broker or dealer.
Accordingly, the SEC's complaint provides that Gratz violated a 1992
SEC Order prohibiting him from association with any broker, dealer or
investment adviser as well as the broker-dealer registration
provisions.
The SEC's complaint seeks to restrain and permanently enjoin Gratz
from violating Sections 15(a)(1) and 15(b)(6)(B) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of
1940, and the 1992 SEC Order. The complaint also requests, among other
things, that Gratz be ordered to pay civil penalties for his
violations of the federal securities laws.
On March 20, 2003, as a result of the alleged fraudulent conduct
described above, the SEC filed an emergency civil contempt action
against Gratz for disobeying a prior final judgment of permanent
injunction entered against him in SEC v. Delta Rental Systems, et.
al., Case No. 91-2136-CIV-MARRA (S.D. Fla.). See , March 25, 2003.
_________________________________________________________________
SNIPPETS:
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on April 15, 2003, it filed a complaint
According to the SEC's complaint, from at least November 1998 until March 20, 2003, Gratz,
The SEC's complaint alleges that, contrary to Gratz's promises, $3.02 million in investor
The complaint also alleges that in connection with his fraudulent misconduct, Gratz received
Accordingly, the SEC's complaint provides that Gratz violated a 1992 SEC Order prohibiting
The SEC's complaint seeks to restrain and permanently enjoin Gratz from violating Sections
The complaint also requests, among other things, that Gratz be ordered to pay civil penalties
On March 20, 2003, as a result of the alleged fraudulent conduct described above, the SEC
|