LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JEFFREY D. CHANDLER and RANDALL JORDAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-18320, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: 14, 2003, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT, Defendant: Jeffrey D. Chandler and Randall Jordan, Plaintiff: SEC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-18320, Disgorgement, Jordan, Chandler, Judgments, Civil Penalty, District Court, Securities, Exchange Commission, Prejudgment, Jeffrey, Randall Jordan, Ecomprar Network, Relief, President, Judgment Setting Disgorgement, Pay Disgorgement, Amount, Plus Prejudgment, Thereon, Imposing, Orders Jordan, Waives Payment, Impose, Sworn Statement, Financial Condition, Supporting Financial Documentation, District Court Pursuant, Permanent Injunction, Consents , ContentID: 120255334

Case Documents
1 2003-09-02 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132624
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JORDAN
CHANDLER
JUDGMENTS
CIVIL PENALTY
DISTRICT COURT
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PREJUDGMENT
JEFFREY
RANDALL JORDAN
ECOMPRAR NETWORK
RELIEF
LITIGATION
PRESIDENT
JUDGMENT SETTING DISGORGEMENT
PAY DISGORGEMENT
AMOUNT
PLUS PREJUDGMENT
THEREON
IMPOSING
ORDERS JORDAN
WAIVES PAYMENT
IMPOSE
SWORN STATEMENT
FINANCIAL CONDITION
SUPPORTING FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION
DISTRICT COURT PURSUANT
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
CONSENTS
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Litigation Release No. 18320 / September 2, 2003

Final Judgments Concerning Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest, and Civil
Penalties Entered against Jeffrey D. Chandler and Randall Jordan, Two Former
Principals of eComprar Network, Inc.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jeffrey D. Chandler and Randall
Jordan, Case No. 02-14222-CIV-MOORE (S.D. Fla.)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that on August
   14, 2003, the United States District Court for the Southern District
   of Florida entered final judgments resolving the monetary issues of
   disgorgement and civil penalties against Jeffrey D. Chandler
   (Chandler) and Randall Jordan (Jordan), the former president and
   executive vice president of eComprar Network, Inc. (eComprar),
   respectively. The District Court entered a Final Judgment Setting
   Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest, a Civil Penalty and Other Relief
   against Chandler ordering him to pay disgorgement in the amount of
   $1,555,000, plus prejudgment interest thereon of $39,108.25, and
   imposing a civil penalty of $110,000. As against Jordan, the District
   Court entered a Final Judgment Setting Disgorgement and Other Relief,
   which orders Jordan to pay disgorgement in the amount of $181,000, but
   waives payment of disgorgement and does not impose a civil penalty
   based upon Jordan's Sworn Statement of Financial Condition and
   supporting financial documentation.

   Both Jordan and Chandler had been previously enjoined by the District
   Court pursuant to Judgments of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief,
   entered by their consents on September 26, 2002 and November 7, 2002,
   respectively.

   For further information, see Litigation Releases (August 9, 2002) and
   (December 6, 2002).

     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 09/02/2003
SNIPPETS:
  • Final Judgments Concerning Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest, and Civil Penalties Entered
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jeffrey D. Chandler and Randall Jordan,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on August 14, 2003, the United States
  • The District Court entered a Final Judgment Setting Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest, a
  • As against Jordan, the District Court entered a Final Judgment Setting Disgorgement and Other
  • Both Jordan and Chandler had been previously enjoined by the District Court pursuant to
  • For further information, see Litigation Releases and.
  •    |