LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JONATHAN G. FINK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-18369, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS,, Defendant: Jonathan G. Fink, Plaintiff: SEC, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-18369, Commission, Fink, Testimony, Subpoena, District, Commission Staff, Securities, Exchange Commission, Jonathan, District Court, Commission Alleges, Purports, Enforcement, Massachusetts, Request, Reconvene, Formal Order, Pursuant, Stock, Trading, Network Marketing Program, Issuance, Telephone Interview, Draft, Consultant, Significant Amount, Shares, Continuation, Potential Role, Common Stock , ContentID: 120255285

Case Documents
1 2003-09-29 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132575
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FINK
TESTIMONY
SUBPOENA
DISTRICT
COMMISSION STAFF
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
JONATHAN
DISTRICT COURT
COMMISSION ALLEGES
PURPORTS
ENFORCEMENT
MASSACHUSETTS
REQUEST
RECONVENE
FORMAL ORDER
PURSUANT
STOCK
TRADING
NETWORK MARKETING PROGRAM
ISSUANCE
TELEPHONE INTERVIEW
DRAFT
CONSULTANT
SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT
SHARES
CONTINUATION
POTENTIAL ROLE
COMMON STOCK
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE No. 18369 / September 29, 2003

   COMMISSION FILES SUBPOENA ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST JONATHAN G. FINK

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. JONATHAN G. FINK
   (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts,
   03-MBD-10291 (RWZ))

   The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that, on
   September 25, 2003, it filed an action in Massachusetts federal court
   to enforce a subpoena against Jonathan G. Fink, of Beverly Hills,
   California. The Commission's Application alleges that, on June 2,
   2003, the Commission served Fink with a subpoena requiring him to
   appear for testimony on July 1, 2003. At Fink's request, the
   Commission staff rescheduled Fink's testimony for July 16, 2003. Fink
   appeared for testimony on July 16; however, his testimony was not
   completed that day. As a result, Fink and Commission staff agreed to
   reconvene his testimony on August 28 and 29. Fink never appeared for
   testimony on those dates, claiming that he was ill. As of the date of
   the Commission's filing, Fink had not responded to the staff's
   requests that he provide documentary evidence concerning his purported
   illness, nor had he proposed new alternative dates for reconvening his
   testimony.

   In its Application, the Commission alleges that, on April 15, 2003,
   the Commission issued a formal order of private investigation entitled
   In the Matter of Converge Global, Inc. Pursuant to the formal order,
   Commission staff began investigating a possible stock manipulation
   scheme related to Converge Global, Inc., a Florida-based holding
   company that purports to sell telecommunications products through
   TeleWrx, Inc., its sole operating subsidiary. Between at least March
   and June 2002, Converge and others disseminated spam e-mails and press
   releases projecting the explosive growth and success of TeleWrx's
   network marketing program. Among other things, Converge's trading
   volume increased 443%, on the day following issuance of one of the
   press releases. On June 26, 2002, Fink admitted, during a telephone
   interview with Commission staff, that he helped to draft at least some
   of Converge's press releases. Fink is also a purported "consultant" to
   Converge and, as such, appears to have received, and distributed, a
   significant amount of Converge shares during the period at issue. The
   Commission alleges in the Application that it requires the
   continuation of Fink's testimony to determine his potential role with
   respect to the Converge press releases and the potential manipulation
   scheme related to trading in Converge common stock between at least
   March and June 2002.

SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • COMMISSION FILES SUBPOENA ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST JONATHAN G. FINK
  • (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts,
  • The Commission's Application alleges that, on June 2, 2003, the Commission served Fink with a
  • At Fink's request, the Commission staff rescheduled Fink's testimony for July 16, 2003.
  • Fink and Commission staff agreed to reconvene his testimony on August 28 and 29.
  • In its Application, the Commission alleges that, on April 15, 2003, the Commission issued a
  • Between at least March and June 2002, Converge and others disseminated spam e-mails and press
  • Among other things, Converge's trading volume increased 443%, on the day following issuance
  • On June 26, 2002, Fink admitted, during a telephone interview with Commission staff, that he
  • Fink is also a purported "consultant" to Converge and, as such, appears to have received, and
  • The Commission alleges in the Application that it requires the continuation of Fink's
  • Pursuant to its Application, the Commission is seeking an order directing Fink to show cause
  • The Commission's action has been assigned to the Honorable Rya W. Zobel, District Court Judge.
  •    |