LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v KENNETH RICE Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVKR144305, CourtName: MISC 5, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVKR144305, United States, Ebs, Enron, United States Code, Securities, Regulations, Texas, Rice, Emon, Joint Venture, Revenue, Shares, Oregon, Aad, Shelby, Violation, Sell Trarious Cummodities, Hannon, Howard, Braveheart Transaction, Bos, Hirko, Tima Relevant, Publicly-traded Oregon Corporation, Misleading, Rule Lob-5, Interstate Commerce , ContentID: 120255244

Case Documents
1 2003-04-29 INDICTMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132520
46 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 46 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . INDICTMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EBS
ENRON
UNITED STATES CODE
SECURITIES
REGULATIONS
TEXAS
RICE
EMON
MEMBERS
JOINT VENTURE
REVENUE
SHARES
OREGON
AAD
SHELBY
DEFENDANTS
VIOLATION
BUSINESS
SELL TRARIOUS CUMMODITIES
HANNON
HOWARD
BRAVEHEART TRANSACTION
BOS
HIRKO
TIMA RELEVANT
PUBLICLY-TRADED OREGON CORPORATION
MISLEADING
RULE LOB-5
INTERSTATE COMMERCE
                                                                                                   




                                       UNITED  STATES  DISTRTCT COURT                          
I             .-  -                     SOUTHQRN  DIS'IXEI'  OF TEXAS                          
                                               HOWl'ON  DMSION                                 
I     IINITBD  STATES  OF AMERICA                       6
                                                        0
              V.                                        8

      KENNETHRICE,                                      0      Vx&icw      15 U.S.C.  $9 78j(b) aad
      JOSEPH  HRKO,                                     8      17 C.F.R. 5 24O.lOb-5 (Securities
      KEVIN  HANNON,                                    0      u,s.c.  QQ 1001 (False S-e);        
      KEVINHOWARD,                                      8      (wire  Fraud); 371 (conapicrrcy); 2
      SCOTTYEAGEIq                                      §      and Abehg);  1957 Qdoney Launde&;
      REX  SHELBY,  and                                 §      9X1 and 982  (Asset Forfeiture); 28
      MIC~KRAUTZ                                        9      U.S.C.  5 2461 (Asset Forfeitcue).




                                                 JM7RODUCTIoN

              1.        At  all times relevant to this Supemeding Indictment,  Enron Carp. (%u04~~)

      publicly-traded  Oregon corporation with  ita headqua&xs in Houston, Texas.  Among  other

      businesses, Enton w  engaged in the purch&  and sate of natural gas, construction-and

      ownership of pipelizw  and potwr  facilitie,  provision of telewmmuni~tion  service,  and

      in contracts to buy and sell trarious cummodities,  Before it  filed far bankruptcy on

      2001,Enrclnw~theseventhlsrgestcorporationin~eU~~Sta~s.

              2.  Enron was a publicly  traded camp~~y whose shares were listed on the New  York

      Stock Exchange.  As a public  company, Enron WHS rqti            to comply with  regulations

      United  States Securities and &c@mge  Commiseion ("SEC").  Those regulations protect

      members of the inv&ing  public by, among  other  thhg~,  tmswing  that a company's 6nancial

      information  is accurately recorded and disclosed to the public.


            FIPR-29-2003            19:23
SNIPPETS:
  • publicly-traded Oregon corporation with ita headqua&xs in Houston,
  • in contracts to buy and sell trarious cummodities, Before it filed far bankruptcy on December
  • Enron was a publicly traded camp~~y whose shares were listed on the New York
  • United States Securities and &c@mge Commiseion.
  • July 1,1997, Enron acquked a pubtic utility, Portland General Corporatiq based in Potid,
  • Fiitpoillt to Emon CommwicE ticma, Inc, and expded the bwhe88.
  • refierred to herein as `BBS"), At all tima relevant to this Indictment, EBS was a whollydwned
  • The Defendants
  • RICE shared CEO responsibilities with JOSEPH HJRKO &om
  • President and CEO of EBS from approximately July 1,.
  • misleading statementa and omit&d material information from stat8ments made,
  • revenue and business perfonmtace of EBS.
  • EJBS's poor business performance.
  • During this same time period, defadanta RICE, HIRKO,
  • SHELBY ht, among 0tht3r things, the Enron network was not intelligent and &ron'a press
  • business aad a ruqjor part of&r&s overall b&as strategy.
  • Operating System," or "BOS."
  • RICB, IHANNON, HOWARD, YEAGER and other& were tiormed that EES - which &ad f&d
  • the fourth quarter of 2000, as &f=danta HANNON, HOWARD and others kned that El%
  • joint venture, which WBS caMI EBS Content Systems LLC.
  • Braveheart transaction on its publicly filed SEC form IO-K fir 2000 and SEC firm 10-Q for the
  • District of Texas and ehewheare, the def'imlants KENNETH RICE, JOSEPH HIRKO, KEVlN
  • (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343,Z and 355 1 et seq.)
  • would and did operate as a fIaud and deceit upon members of the inv&ing public,
  • in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Section 78jand 78ff.
  • interstate commerce, in violation of Rule lob-S of the Rule and Regulations of the United
  • ia violation of Rule lob-5 of the mles and Regulstins of the United States
  •    |