LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v JEFFREY STONE EVANS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVJSE127766, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION II, Plaintiff: FTC, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVJSE127766, Ftc Act, Act, Participation, Commission, Scheme, Ftc, Marketing Program, Trade Commission, Recruit, Chain Letter, Violation, Practices, Deceptive Acts, Hereby, Federal Trade Commission, Paragraph, Consumers, Sales, Relief, Permanent, Federal Trade, Recruits, Employees, Stone Evans, Representations, Personal Service, Multi-level Marketing Program, Pursuant, Substantial Income, Reports, Numerous Instances, Commerce, Equitable Relief, Complaint, Active Concert, Promoter, Agents, District , ContentID: 120255020

Case Documents
1   STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132216
12 pages
PDF
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132215
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 20 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT
FTC
MARKETING PROGRAM
COMMISSION
HEREBY
FTC ACT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
SALES
PERMANENT
TRADE COMMISSION
RECRUITS
EMPLOYEES
STONE EVANS
PERSONAL SERVICE
SCHEME
MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING PROGRAM
PURSUANT
ACTIVE CONCERT
PROMOTER
AGENTS
DISTRICT
COURT
PLAINTIFF
NOTIFICATION LETTER
PARAGRAPH
CHAIN MAIL
PAYMENT
INCOME
LAW
f      +
      E60  s-q-m                                                                                   
                                        UNITED  STATES           DISTRICT       COURT              
                                                                                              
                                           EASTERN  DISTRICT             OF  TEXAS
                                                  SHERMAN  DIVISION                                


       FEDERAL  TRADE  COMMISSION,

                Plaintiff,

                V.

       JEFFREY  STONE  EVANS               also  known  as
        STONE  EVANS  and  MARKWISE

                Defendant.


                                 STIPULATED          FINAL  JUDGMENT            AND  ORDER
                                         FOR  A PERMANENT               INJUNCTION

                Plaintiff,  Federal  Trade  Commission  ("FTC"  or  "Commission"),  has tiled  a

        for  permanent  injunction  and  other  relief  in  this  matter  pursuant  to  Section 

        Trade  Commission  Act  ("FTC  Act"),  15 U.S.C.  $53(b);  charging  defendant  Jeffrey 

        with  violations  of  Section  5 of  the  FTC  Act,  15 USC.  5 45(a).  Defendant  has

        the  Summons  and  Complaint.  Plaintiff  FTC,  reprexnted  by the  undersigned  attorney, 

        defendant  Jeffrey  Stone  Evans,  pro  se, have  agreed  to  entry  of  this  Stipulated 

        Order  for  Permanent  Injunction  ("Order")  by this  Court  to resolve  all  matters  in 

        action  without  trial.  Pursuant  to  agreement  and  stipulation,  IT  IS HEREBY  ORDERED,

        ADJUDGED  AND  AGREED  as follows:





                                                                -l-


                                                      FINDINGS
SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), has tiled a Complaint
  • for permanent injunction and other relief in this matter pursuant to Section 13of the Federal
  • 15 U.S.C. $53; charging defendant Jeffrey Stone Evans
  • with violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act,
  • Order for Permanent Injunction by this Court to resolve all matters in dispute in this
  • Pursuant to agreement and stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
  • "Multi-level marketing program" means any marketing program in which
  • recruit additional participants or have additional participants placed by the promoter
  • compensation, in whole or in part, based upon the sales of those in the participant's
  • tree, cooperative, income center or similar program grouping.
  • "Participating" in a multi-level marketing program or a prohibited marketing
  • or scheme, as well as acting or serving as an officer, director, employee, salesperson, agent,
  • makes a payment and receives the right, license or opportunity to derive income as a
  • the recruitment of additional recruits by the participant, program, promoter or
  • employees and those persons in active concert or participation with him who receive actual
  • notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise,
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant, his officers, agents, servants, employees
  • subject to Paragraph I, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from providing to
  • enforcement agency or as required by any law,
  • notification letter, pursuant to Paragraph VI of this Order.
  • You should be aware that, contrary to the statements made in that message, I have been told
  • (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas).

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANT
    FTC ACT
    RECRUIT
    SCHEME
    CHAIN LETTER
    VIOLATION
    PRACTICES
    DECEPTIVE ACTS
    COMMISSION
    CONSUMERS
    RELIEF
    FEDERAL TRADE
    TRADE COMMISSION
    REPRESENTATIONS
    PARAGRAPH
    SUBSTANTIAL INCOME
    REPORTS
    NUMEROUS INSTANCES
    COURT
    COMMERCE
    EQUITABLE RELIEF
    COMPLAINT
    PLAINTIFF
    IMPLICATION
    INSTRUCTS
    SPAM
    STATUTE
    REDRESS
    DISGORGEMENT
    
                                    UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT                              FILE
                                                                                             U.S. 
                                      EASTERN  DISTRICT  OF TEXAS                     EASTERN        
                                             SHERMAN  DIVISION                                  MAY - 
                                                                               1         DAVID  J.
    FEDERAL  TRADE  COMMISSION,                                                1
                                                                               )     ELJTY-------
            Plaintiff,                                                         1
    
            V.
    
    
    JEFFREY  STONE  EVANS.  also known  as
    STONE  EVANS.  and MARK  WISE
    
            Defendant.
    
    
                   COMPLAINT      FOR  INJUNCTIVE         AND  OTHER  EQUITABLE               RELIEF
    
            Plaintiff  theFederal Trade Commission  ("FTC"  or "Commission"),  for its Complaint 
    
    as follows:
    
            1.         The  Commission  brings  this  action  under  Section  13(b)  of  the  Federal
    
    Commission  Act  ("FTC  Act"),  15 U.S.C.  9 53(b), to obtain permanent injunctive  relief  against
    
    defendant to prevent him  from  engaging in deceptive acts or practices in violation  of Section
    
    of  the  FTC  Act,  15 U.S.C.  0  45(a),  and to  obtain  other equitable  relief,  including 
    
    restitution,  and disgorgement, as is necessary in order to redress injury  to consumers and the
    
    interest resulting  from  the defendant's violations  of the FTC  Act.
    
                                         JURISDICTION           AND  VENUE
    
            2.         Subject matter jurisdiction  is conferred upon this Court by 15 U.S.C.  0 53(b)
    
    U.S.C.  9$1331,1337(a),  and 1345.
    
            3.         Venue in the United  States District  Court for the Eastern District  of Texas
    
    
    
                                                          1
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff theFederal Trade Commission, for its Complaint alleges
  • Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 9 53, to obtain permanent injunctive relief against the
  • defendant to prevent him from engaging in deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section
  • interest resulting from the defendant's violations of the FTC Act.
  • States Government created by statute.
  • The Commission is authorized to initiate federal district court proceedings,
  • to enjoin violations of the FTC Act and to secure such other equitable relief as may be
  • appropriate in each case, including redress and disgorgement.
  • course of trade in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the FTC
  • Since at least February 2002, the defendant has promoted a "get rich quick" scheme
  • through the use of unsolicited commercial email ("UCE" or "spam") sent in bulk to numerous
  • consumers throughout the country.
  • The scheme promoted by the defendant instructs a new recruit to mail a five dollar
  • Upon receipt of the cash payment, the participants email to the new recruit one of four or
  • of the four or five reports from the other participants, he or she is instructed to forward
  • The defendant promotes what is commonly known as a "chain letter" or pyramid
  • In his UCE, the defendant also has represented, expressly or by implication, that the
  • the defendant's messages includes the following representations:
  • consumers who participate in the chain letter program are likely to receive substantial
  • In truth and in fact, in numerous instances, consumers who participate in the chain
  • constitutes a deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5of the FTC Act,
  • This additional information, described in paragraph 21, would be material to
  • prevent and remedy any violations of any provision of law enforced by the Federal Trade
  •    |