LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v PETER MATUS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-47487, Defendant: Peter Matus, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-47487, Exchange Act, Matus, Securities, Commission, Administrative Proceedings, Respondent, Pursuant, Making Findings, Remedial Sanctions, Complaint, Carreker, Peter Matus, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Hereby, Admitting, Violation, District, Deems, Purpose, Party, Denying, Consents, Entry, Trading, Permanent, Thereunder, Laws, George Matus, Carreker Corporation, Disclose , ContentID: 120255002

Case Documents
1 2003-03-12 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132184
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MATUS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
RESPONDENT
PURSUANT
MAKING FINDINGS
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
COMPLAINT
CARREKER
PETER MATUS
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
HEREBY
ADMITTING
VIOLATION
DISTRICT
DEEMS
PURPOSE
PARTY
DENYING
CONSENTS
ENTRY
TRADING
PERMANENT
THEREUNDER
LAWS
GEORGE MATUS
CARREKER CORPORATION
DISCLOSE
United States of America
before the
Securities and Exchange Commission

Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 47487 / March 12, 2003

Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-11061
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   PETER MATUS,

   Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(b)
   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
   REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative
   proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 15(b)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Peter
   Matus ("Respondent" or "Matus").

II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent
   has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the "Offer") which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these
   proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the
   Commission's jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
   proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.2 below, which
   are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order
   Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing
   Remedial Sanctions ("Order"), as set forth below.

III.

   On the basis of this Order and Respondent's Offer, the Commission
SNIPPETS:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 15
  • OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf rities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, as set forth below.
  • Matus was permanently enjoined on June 24, 2002, from violations of Section 10of the Exchange
  • Matus consented to the entry of the permanent injunction without admitting or denying any
  • The Complaint further alleged that George Matus had a fiduciary duty not to disclose this
  • the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions
  • ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
  • Rule 141 of the Commission's Rules of Practice provides that the Secretary, or another duly
  •    |