LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ROBERT L. BENTLEY RELEASE NO.: IA-2120 Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-47589, Defendant: Robert L. Bentley Release No.: IA-2120, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-47589, Act, Investment, Commission, Securities, Exchange Act, Investment Advisers, Respondent, Bentley, Pursuant, Instituting, Findings, Selling, Cds, United States, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Admitting, Complaint, Buying, Administrative Proceedings, Matter, Robert, Making Findings, Settlement, Denying, Consents, Entry, Broker-dealer, Injunction, Allegations , ContentID: 120254984

Case Documents
1 2003-03-28 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132166
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTMENT
COMMISSION
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT
INVESTMENT ADVISERS
RESPONDENT
BENTLEY
PURSUANT
DEFENDANTS
INSTITUTING
FINDINGS
SELLING
CDS
UNITED STATES
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
ADMITTING
COMPLAINT
BUYING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
MATTER
ROBERT
MAKING FINDINGS
SETTLEMENT
DENYING
CONSENTS
ENTRY
BROKER-DEALER
INJUNCTION
ALLEGATIONS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 47589 / March 28, 2003

   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
   Release No. 2120 / March 28, 2003

   Administrative Proceedings
   File No. 3-11077
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   Robert L. Bentley,

                                                              Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Order Instituting Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial
   Sanctions Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
   1934 and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940

                                     I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative
   proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 15(b)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Section
   203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") against
   Robert L. Bentley ("Respondent" or "Bentley").

                                    II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent
   has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the "Offer") which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these
   proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the
   Commission's jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
   proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.2 below, which
   are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order
   Instituting Proceedings, Making Findings and

   Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • In the Matter of
  • Order Instituting Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of
  • Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Section 15of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  • From at least January 1996 until the Commission filed its complaint on October 23, 2001,
  • Bentley consented to the entry of the injunction without admitting or denying the allegations
  • The Commission's complaint alleged that the defendants claimed to be selling bank-issued,
  • Although the defendants were using at least some investor funds to buy CDs, the terms of the
  • Rather, they were buying higher risk securities issued by defendants, whose business was
  •    |