LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v J.W. BARCLAY & CO., INC., JOHN A. BRUNO, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-8218, Defendant: J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., John A. Bruno, Michael J. Wills, Edgar B. Alacan, Emmanuel P. Cube, Mayer Dallal, Danoo Noor, Sr., Emanuele A. Scarso, and Michael B. Scott Release No.: 34-47611, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-8218, Securities, Scott, Act, Commission, Exchange Act, Respondent, Customers, Accounts, Pursuant, Purchases, Michael, Findings, Representations, Sales, Material Fact, Imposing, Misleading, Violations, Disgorgement, Penalty, Directing, Fraudulent, Payment, Petition, Defense, State Material Facts, Matter, Barclay, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Defraud , ContentID: 120254981

Case Documents
1 2003-04-01 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132163
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SCOTT
ACT
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE ACT
RESPONDENT
CUSTOMERS
ACCOUNTS
PURSUANT
PURCHASES
MICHAEL
FINDINGS
REPRESENTATIONS
SALES
MATERIAL FACT
IMPOSING
MISLEADING
VIOLATIONS
DISGORGEMENT
PENALTY
DIRECTING
FRAUDULENT
PAYMENT
PETITION
DEFENSE
STATE MATERIAL FACTS
MATTER
BARCLAY
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
DEFRAUD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Securities Act of 1933
Release No. 8218 / April 1, 2003

Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 47611 / April 1, 2003

Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-10765
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   J.W. BARCLAY & CO., INC.
   JOHN A. BRUNO
   MICHAEL J. WILLS
   EDGAR B. ALACAN
   EMMANUEL P. CUBE
   MAYER DALLAL
   DANOO NOOR, SR.
   EMANUELE A. SCARSO
   MICHAEL B. SCOTT

   Respondents.

     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A
   CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF
   1933 AND SECTIONS 15(b) AND 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   AS TO MICHAEL B. SCOTT



I.

   On April 24, 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission
   ("Commission") instituted public administrative proceedings pursuant
   to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and
   Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   ("Exchange Act") against Respondent Michael B. Scott ("Scott" or
   "Respondent") and others. Scott has submitted an Offer of Settlement
   ("Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept.

II.
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • EMANUELE A. SCARSO MICHAEL B. SCOTT
  • 1933 AND SECTIONS 15AND 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • AS TO MICHAEL B. SCOTT
  • On April 24, 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission instituted public administrative
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf 15and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as to Michael B. Scott, as set forth below.
  • Scott was associated as a registered representative with J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., a
  • During the time period from in or about June 1997 through in or about March 1998, Scott
  • Scott made unauthorized purchases and sales of securities in the account of at least one
  • Scott made materially misleading statements or omissions to at least one customer by, among
  • Based on the foregoing, Scott willfully violated Section 17of the Securities Act in that he, the circumstance under which they were made, not misleading; or engaged in transactions, practices
  • As part of his fraudulent conduct, Scott engaged in the activities described in paragraphs
  • Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent
  • Respondent shall pay disgorgement of $53,113.50 plus prejudgment interest, but that payment
  • Based upon Respondent's sworn representations in his Statement of Financial Condition dated
  • The Division of Enforcement may, at any time following the entry of this Order, petition the
  • No other issue shall be considered in connection with this petition other than whether the
  • Respondent may not, by way of defense to any such petition contest the findings in this
  •    |