LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v NED C. SNEIDERMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17945, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CIVIL ACTION, Defendant: Ned C. Sneiderman, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17945, Sneiderman, Securities, Exchange, Fraud, Stock, Viasource, Extreme Networks, Civil Penalty, Northern District, Exchange Act, Complaint, Price, Technology Company, Phony, Pay, Enjoining, Internet, Judgement, California, Exchange Commission, Thereunder, Violating, Liability, Capitalizing, Preventing Sneiderman, Trading, Tender, Existence , ContentID: 120254970

Case Documents
1 2003-01-22 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132152
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
COURT
EXCHANGE
FRAUD
STOCK
VIASOURCE
EXTREME NETWORKS
CIVIL PENALTY
NORTHERN DISTRICT
EXCHANGE ACT
COMPLAINT
PRICE
TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
PHONY
PAY
ENJOINING
INTERNET
JUDGEMENT
CALIFORNIA
LITIGATION
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
THEREUNDER
VIOLATING
LIABILITY
CAPITALIZING
PREVENTING SNEIDERMAN
TRADING
TENDER
EXISTENCE
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 17945 / January 22, 2003

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NED C. SNEIDERMAN, United States
   District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil Action
   No. C-02-0001

   COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT, ORDERS PENALTIES AGAINST KENTUCKY MAN FOR
   INTERNET HOAX

   On January 13, 2003, federal judge James Ware of the Northern District
   of California granted the Securities and Exchange Commission's motion
   for default judgment against Ned Sneiderman, enjoining the 25-year-old
   Louisville resident from committing securities fraud and ordering him
   to pay a $60,000 civil penalty.

   The SEC sued Sneiderman, 25, in January 2002, alleging that Sneiderman
   had posted a phony press release on a Yahoo! Internet bulletin board.
   The press release purported to announce that Extreme Networks, Inc.
   ("Extreme Networks"), a Santa Clara technology company, was acquiring
   Viasource Communications, Inc. ("Viasource"), a small Florida
   technology company. The phony news caused Viasource's stock price and
   volume to surge. According to the SEC's complaint, Sneiderman had
   purchased Viasource stock earlier that morning, and had hoped to
   profit from the price spike caused by his fraud. However, within an
   hour after the false posting, Extreme Networks and Viasource denied
   the existence of a tender offer, and trading in both stocks was halted
   temporarily, preventing Sneiderman from capitalizing on his fraud.

   Sneiderman repeatedly failed to appear before the court. In the
   January 13, 2003, order, the court found that the SEC's complaint and
   evidence submitted by the SEC established Sneiderman's liability for
   securities fraud. The court permanently enjoined Sneiderman from
   violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and ordered him to pay
   $60,000 in civil penalties.

   For further information, see Litigation Release No. 17294 (January 3,
   2002).

     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 01/23/2003
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NED C. SNEIDERMAN, United States District Court for the
  • COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT, ORDERS PENALTIES AGAINST KENTUCKY MAN FOR INTERNET HOAX
  • On January 13, 2003, federal judge James Ware of the Northern District of California granted
  • The press release purported to announce that Extreme Networks, Inc., a Santa Clara technology
  • The phony news caused Viasource's stock price and volume to surge.
  • According to the SEC's complaint, Sneiderman had purchased Viasource stock earlier that
  • However, within an hour after the false posting, Extreme Networks and Viasource denied the
  • In the January 13, 2003, order, the court found that the SEC's complaint and evidence
  • The court permanently enjoined Sneiderman from violating Section 10of the Securities Exchange
  • For further information, see Litigation Release No. 17294 (January 3,
  •    |