LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ROCKY MOUNTAIN SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17976, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF, Defendant: Rocky Mountain Securities & Investments, Inc. and Judith L. Clarke, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17976, Rocky Mountain, Commission, Clarke, Exchange Act, Violating, Firm, Securities, Records Provisions, Temporary Restraining Order, Customer Protection, Account, Broker-dealer Books, Prohibiting, Permanent Injunctions, Federal Securities Laws, Denver, District, Money Market Account, Losses, Trading, Antifraud, Charged Clarke, Liquidate, Trustee, Motion, Asset Freeze, Investments, Colorado, Civil Penalties, Disgorgement Plus Prejudgment , ContentID: 120254939

Case Documents
1 2003-02-10 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 132121
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
CLARKE
EXCHANGE ACT
VIOLATING
FIRM
SECURITIES
RECORDS PROVISIONS
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
CUSTOMER PROTECTION
ACCOUNT
BROKER-DEALER BOOKS
PROHIBITING
PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
DENVER
DISTRICT
MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT
LOSSES
TRADING
ANTIFRAUD
CHARGED CLARKE
LIQUIDATE
TRUSTEE
MOTION
ASSET FREEZE
INVESTMENTS
COLORADO
CIVIL PENALTIES
DISGORGEMENT PLUS PREJUDGMENT
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

Litigation Release No. 17976 / February 10, 2003

   No. 03-MK-0228 (District of Colorado)

   On February 5, 2003, The Securities and Exchange Commission filed an
   action in the United States District Court for the District of
   Colorado against Rocky Mountain Securities & Investments, Inc. ("Rocky
   Mountain"), a brokerage firm headquartered in Denver, and Judith L.
   Clarke, a Denver resident and former employee of Rocky Mountain. Rocky
   Mountain ceased business on February 3, 2003, due to a multi-million
   dollar net capital deficiency. The Commission alleged that Rocky
   Mountain violated the net capital and customer protection provisions
   of the federal securities laws contained in Section 15(c)(3)(a) of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 15c3-1 and
   15c3-3. The Commission also alleged that Rocky Mountain violated the
   broker-dealer books and record provisions of the Exchange Act
   contained in Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-3. In this
   action, the Commission sought a temporary restraining order and asset
   freeze against the firm, as well as preliminary and permanent
   injunctions. In addition, the Commission filed a joint motion with the
   Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC"), which filed a
   separate action, to have a trustee appointed to liquidate the firm.

   In the action the Commission also charged Clarke with aiding and
   abetting Rocky Mountain's violations of the net capital, customer
   protection and books and records provisions. The Commission also
   charged Clarke with violating the antifraud provisions of the Exchange
   Act contained in Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. The
   Commission alleged that Clarke had traded equities for Rocky Mountain
   in an account at the firm and allegedly incurred significant trading
   losses, which she attempted to conceal from the firm by creating false
   trading records. To pay the debts owed by Rocky Mountain as the result
   of the losses, Clarke allegedly used almost the entire $4.5 million
   balance of a money market account in Rocky Mountain's name. This money
   market account had contained cash belonging to Rocky Mountain's retail
   customers. The Commission sought against Clarke a temporary
   restraining order, asset freeze and an order to provide an accounting,
   as well as preliminary and permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus
   prejudgment interest and civil penalties.

   On February 7, 2003, a temporary restraining order was entered against
   Rocky Mountain prohibiting the firm from violating the net capital,
   customer protection and broker-dealer books and records provisions the
   firm was alleged to have violated in the complaint. In addition, John
   D. Shively of the law firm Fagre & Benson in Denver was appointed to
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • No. 03-MK-0228 (District of Colorado)
  • On February 5, 2003, The Securities and Exchange Commission filed an action in the United
  • The Commission alleged that Rocky Mountain violated the net capital and customer protection
  • The Commission also alleged that Rocky Mountain violated the broker-dealer books and record
  • In this action, the Commission sought a temporary restraining order and asset freeze against
  • In addition, the Commission filed a joint motion with the Securities Investor Protection
  • In the action the Commission also charged Clarke with aiding and abetting Rocky Mountain's
  • The Commission also charged Clarke with violating the antifraud provisions of the Exchange
  • The Commission alleged that Clarke had traded equities for Rocky Mountain in an account at
  • To pay the debts owed by Rocky Mountain as the result of the losses, Clarke allegedly used
  • The Commission sought against Clarke a temporary restraining order, asset freeze and an order
  • On February 7, 2003, a temporary restraining order was entered against Rocky Mountain
  • Clarke was also prohibited, inter alia, from disposing of any funds that she had obtained in
  •    |