LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v WILLIAM J. YOUNG Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14771, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL ACTION, Defendant: William J. Young, Plaintiff: SEC, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14771, Commission, Ams, Securities, District, Exchange, Exchange Act, Violating, Control, American Mobile Systems, Judgement, States District Court, United States, Matter, Thereunder, Entry, Periodic Reports, Funds, Arrangement, Accounting, Columbia, William, Sea, Cease, Securities Laws, Internal Control Provisions, Therein, Denying, Admitting, Related Matter , ContentID: 120254656

Case Documents
1 1996-01-03 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131660
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AMS
SECURITIES
COURT
DISTRICT
EXCHANGE
EXCHANGE ACT
VIOLATING
CONTROL
AMERICAN MOBILE SYSTEMS
JUDGEMENT
STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES
MATTER
THEREUNDER
ENTRY
PERIODIC REPORTS
FUNDS
ARRANGEMENT
ACCOUNTING
COLUMBIA
WILLIAM
SEA
CEASE
SECURITIES LAWS
INTERNAL CONTROL PROVISIONS
THEREIN
DENYING
ADMITTING
RELATED MATTER

         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WILLIAM J. YOUNG, United
States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action
No. 1: 95CV01336 (GK).

Litigation Release No. 14771 / January 3, 1996

Accounting and Auditing Enforcement
Release No.  747 / January 3, 1996

     On December 12, 1995, the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia entered a Final Judgment of Permanent
Injunction and Other Equitable Relief against William J. Young,
the former president of American Mobile Systems, Inc.

     The Court's Final Judgment was based on Young's default.  In
its complaint, the Commission alleged that between July 1988 and
March 1992, Young arranged for AMS to advance substantial funds
to various nonpublic entities under his control and ultimately
used this arrangement to misappropriate company funds.  The
Commission further alleged that Young was responsible for
material misrepresentations and omissions concerning AMS's
transactions with the entities in periodic reports.  Moreover,
the Commission alleged that Young made false statements to AMS's
auditors in connection with audits of AMS's financial statements,
and that Young failed to implement a sufficient system of
internal accounting controls at AMS.

     Based on Young's default and the SEC's Application for Entry
of Final Judgment, the Court enjoined Young from violating
Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b)
and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules
10b-5 and 13b2-2 thereunder.  Further, the Court barred Young
from acting as an officer or director of any public company, and
ordered Young to disgorge $2,825,961.03, the amount by which he
was unjustly enriched by his illegal conduct, plus prejudgment
interest.

     In a related matter, AMS consented to the entry of an Order
of the Commission, without admitting or denying the matters set
forth therein, finding that AMS violated periodic reporting and
internal control provisions of the securities laws.  The
Commission ordered AMS to cease and desist from violating
Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-
20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. (In the Matter of American
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WILLIAM J. YOUNG, United States District Court for the
  • On December 12, 1995, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a
  • The Court's Final Judgment was based on Young's default.
  • In its complaint, the Commission alleged that between July 1988 and March 1992, Young
  • The Commission further alleged that Young was responsible for material misrepresentations and
  • Moreover, the Commission alleged that Young made false statements to AMS's auditors in
  • Based on Young's default and the SEC's Application for Entry of Final Judgment, the Court
  • In a related matter, AMS consented to the entry of an Order of the Commission, without
  • The Commission ordered AMS to cease and desist from violating Sections 13and 13of the
  • (In the Matter of American Mobile Systems Inc. SEA Release No. 35888/June 26,
  •    |