LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY v MICHAEL H. URBACH, AS COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0150, Gas, York, Tax, Tennessee, Sales, Interstate, Natural Gas, Commission, Pipeline, Taxes, Taxation, Ferc, Price, Commerce Clause, Tax Law, Act, Transportation, Deregulation, Supreme Court, Consumers, Tax Burdens, Gas Pipeline Company, Public Service Commission, Purchase Gas, Compensatory Tax, Pass-through, Customers, Ny2d, Federal Energy Regulatory, Local Distribution Companies , ContentID: 120254627

Case Documents
1   OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131631
8 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
YORK
TAX
TENNESSEE
SALES
INTERSTATE
NATURAL GAS
COMMISSION
PIPELINE
TAXES
TAXATION
FERC
PRICE
COMMERCE CLAUSE
TAX LAW
ACT
TRANSPORTATION
DEREGULATION
SUPREME COURT
CONSUMERS
TAX BURDENS
GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
PURCHASE GAS
COMPENSATORY TAX
PASS-THROUGH
CUSTOMERS
NY2D
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
LOCAL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES


   3 No. 71
   Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company,
   Appellant,
   v.
   Michael H. Urbach, as Commissioner of the Department of Taxation and
   Finance of the State of New York, et al.,
   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 150

   May 1, 2001

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Christopher L. Doyle, for appellant.
   Andrew D. Bing, for respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   WESLEY, J.:

   When Congress passed the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (see, 15
   USC § 3301, et seq.), it set in motion the deregulation of the natural
   gas industry. At that time, interstate pipeline companies enjoyed
   market control of prices as they provided the only means for the sale
   and distribution of gas from the wellhead to local distribution
   companies (regulated utilities in New York).(1) In 1992, the
   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) completed the transition
   when it ordered all interstate pipelines to "unbundle" their
   transportation services from their gas sales (FERC Order No. 636, 57
   Fed Reg 13267). The pipelines became common carriers of natural gas
   (see, e.g., Matter of Texas E. Transmission Corp. v Tax Appeals
   Tribunal, , 95 NY2d 323, 325-329). Large industrial buyers could
   now buy natural gas directly from suppliers, bypassing local
   utilities. The gas is delivered by pipeline, or more commonly, by a
   New York gas utility. Pursuant to FERC-approved tariffs, the cost of
   the transport paid by the user is separate from the purchase price of
   the gas.

   Allowing industrial end users to bypass local utilities and purchase
   gas outside the State created a tax problem for New York. The State's
   system of natural gas taxation was developed prior to deregulation and
   focused on utilities and other entities that sold gas within New York.
   Section 186 of the Tax Law imposes a corporate franchise tax on any
   corporation, joint stock company or association "formed for or
SNIPPETS:
  • This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • When Congress passed the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, it set in motion the deregulation of
  • At that time, interstate pipeline companies enjoyed market control of prices as they provided
  • the cost of the transport paid by the user is separate from the purchase price of the gas.
  • Allowing industrial end users to bypass local utilities and purchase gas outside the State
  • The State's system of natural gas taxation was developed prior to deregulation and focused on
  • Section 186 of the Tax Law imposes a corporate franchise tax on any corporation, joint stock
  • Although utilities are prohibited from identifying taxes assessed pursuant to section 186-a
  • Deregulation allowed end users to avoid the "pass-through" taxes by buying gas from
  • In an attempt to recapture those taxes and to "equalize" the tax burden on all gas consumers,
  • At the time the Legislature enacted section 189, it took note that the taxes imposed by
  • Tennessee Gas is a natural gas pipeline company that acts primarily as a transporter of
  • Supreme Court dismissed Tennessee's complaint for failure to exhaust its administrative
  • The Appellate Division noted that the purpose of the statute is to equalize the tax burdens
  • Where a tax is facially discriminatory it may survive Commerce Clause scrutiny if the State
  • The State contends that the import tax survives Tennessee's Commerce Clause challenge because
  • As United States Supreme Court Justice Cardozo noted, under a truly compensatory tax scheme
  • Moreover, because the in-State taxes are imposed on a receipt tax basis (including
  •    |