LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

APPT THE PEOPLE &C. v BEDROS YAVRU-SAKUK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: APPT THE PEOPLE &C., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I02_0061, Appellate, Recording, Tape, Appellate Review, Reverse, Exhibit, Evidence, Loss, Appellate Term, Conviction, Reconstruction, Ny2d, Necessitates, Testifying, Complainant, Opinion, Respondent, Strollo, Effective Appellate Review, Judge, Testimony, Accusations, Proceeding, Presumption, Allegations, Sexual Abuse, Reports, Accordance , ContentID: 120254600

Case Documents
1   OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131604
5 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
APPELLATE
DEFENDANT
RECORDING
TAPE
APPELLATE REVIEW
REVERSE
EXHIBIT
EVIDENCE
LOSS
APPELLATE TERM
CONVICTION
RECONSTRUCTION
NY2D
NECESSITATES
TESTIFYING
COMPLAINANT
OPINION
RESPONDENT
STROLLO
EFFECTIVE APPELLATE REVIEW
JUDGE
TESTIMONY
ACCUSATIONS
PROCEEDING
PRESUMPTION
ALLEGATIONS
SEXUAL ABUSE
REPORTS
ACCORDANCE


   AppT No. 72
   The People &c.,
   Appellant,
   v.
   Bedros Yavru-Sakuk,
   Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2002 NY Int. 61

   June 4, 2002

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Vered Adoni, for appellant.
   Sarita Kedia, for respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   LEVINE, J.:

   Defendant, a dentist, was convicted of sexual abuse in the third
   degree (Penal Law § 130.55) for fondling a 17-year-old girl during
   an appointment. The issue in this case is whether the loss on appeal
   of a trial exhibit -- a tape recording of a conversation in which
   defendant responded to the victim's allegations of abuse -- warranted
   summary reversal of defendant's conviction on the ground that the loss
   deprived the Appellate Term of the ability to conduct any meaningful
   appellate review.

   The complainant testified at a bench trial about the events in
   question, including that defendant sexually abused her while
   purportedly treating her teeth. A police investigator also testified
   that, when this incident was reported to the police several months
   later, she requested the complainant to call defendant at his office
   to confront him with the accusations of sexual abuse. A tape recording
   of that conversation was admitted into evidence. When questioned at
   trial about the conversation, defendant testified that he was shocked
   by the allegations and could not freely discuss them at the time of
   the phone call because of the presence of his dental assistant and a
   patient. However, he conceded his failure to deny the allegations of
   physical contact, testifying instead that he had told the complainant
   that "there is a misunderstanding; there is a mistake. * * * I am
   sorry for the way you feel, okay" and that "it was not my intent."

   The court found defendant guilty and sentenced him to one year
SNIPPETS:
  • This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Sarita Kedia, for respondent.
  • The issue in this case is whether the loss on appeal of a trial exhibit -- a tape recording
  • The complainant testified at a bench trial about the events in question, including that
  • A police investigator also testified that, when this incident was reported to the police
  • A tape recording of that conversation was admitted into evidence.
  • However, he conceded his failure to deny the allegations of physical contact, testifying
  • The court found defendant guilty and sentenced him to one year probation.
  • primarily arguing that the trial court erred in denying his request to admit certain expert
  • Because defendant had already served his sentence of probation on this Class B misdemeanor,
  • A Judge of this Court granted the People leave to appeal and we now reverse.
  • To determine whether the loss of a trial exhibit necessitates the reversal of a conviction or
  • Moreover, as articulated in our later precedents, there "is a presumption of regularity which
  • Therefore, a reversal is appropriate only "when a record cannot be reconstructed because of
  • In that case, the defendant, who was convicted after a jury trial, argued that he was
  • On the other hand, if the information in the exhibit is important, but otherwise not
  • If reconstruction of the tape was deemed necessary but was not accomplished, the court should
  • the order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the case remitted to that court for
  •    |