![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
APPELLATE DEFENDANT RECORDING TAPE APPELLATE REVIEW REVERSE EXHIBIT EVIDENCE LOSS APPELLATE TERM CONVICTION RECONSTRUCTION NY2D NECESSITATES TESTIFYING COMPLAINANT OPINION RESPONDENT STROLLO EFFECTIVE APPELLATE REVIEW JUDGE TESTIMONY ACCUSATIONS PROCEEDING PRESUMPTION ALLEGATIONS SEXUAL ABUSE REPORTS ACCORDANCE |
AppT No. 72
The People &c.,
Appellant,
v.
Bedros Yavru-Sakuk,
Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
2002 NY Int. 61
June 4, 2002
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
Vered Adoni, for appellant.
Sarita Kedia, for respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
LEVINE, J.:
Defendant, a dentist, was convicted of sexual abuse in the third
degree (Penal Law § 130.55) for fondling a 17-year-old girl during
an appointment. The issue in this case is whether the loss on appeal
of a trial exhibit -- a tape recording of a conversation in which
defendant responded to the victim's allegations of abuse -- warranted
summary reversal of defendant's conviction on the ground that the loss
deprived the Appellate Term of the ability to conduct any meaningful
appellate review.
The complainant testified at a bench trial about the events in
question, including that defendant sexually abused her while
purportedly treating her teeth. A police investigator also testified
that, when this incident was reported to the police several months
later, she requested the complainant to call defendant at his office
to confront him with the accusations of sexual abuse. A tape recording
of that conversation was admitted into evidence. When questioned at
trial about the conversation, defendant testified that he was shocked
by the allegations and could not freely discuss them at the time of
the phone call because of the presence of his dental assistant and a
patient. However, he conceded his failure to deny the allegations of
physical contact, testifying instead that he had told the complainant
that "there is a misunderstanding; there is a mistake. * * * I am
sorry for the way you feel, okay" and that "it was not my intent."
The court found defendant guilty and sentenced him to one year
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |