LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SSM THE PEOPLE &C. v EDWIN TOSCA Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: SSM THE PEOPLE &C., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I02_0069, Testimony, Trial Court, Memorandum, Appellant, Judge, Instructions, Ny2d, Police, Admitting, Reports, Respondent, Graffeo Concur, Rosenblatt, Wesley, Ciparick, Levine, Judges Smith, Chief Judge Kaye, Submissions Pursuant, Review, Prompt Curative Instructions, Summation, Questionable Remarks, Uncharged Crime, Considered Proof, Jury, Trial Court Twice, Confronted Defendant, Background Information , ContentID: 120254597

Case Documents
1   OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131601
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT
TRIAL COURT
MEMORANDUM
APPELLANT
JUDGE
INSTRUCTIONS
NY2D
POLICE
ADMITTING
REPORTS
RESPONDENT
GRAFFEO CONCUR
ROSENBLATT
WESLEY
CIPARICK
LEVINE
JUDGES SMITH
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT
REVIEW
PROMPT CURATIVE INSTRUCTIONS
SUMMATION
QUESTIONABLE REMARKS
UNCHARGED CRIME
CONSIDERED PROOF
JURY
TRIAL COURT TWICE
CONFRONTED DEFENDANT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION


   1 No. 96 SSM 9
   The People &c.,
   Respondent,
   v.
   Edwin Tosca,
   Appellant.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2002 NY Int. 69

   June 6, 2002

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Submitted by Melissa Rothstein, for appellant.
   Submitted by David S. Weisel, for respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________
     _________________________________________________________________

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The trial
   court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the police officers'
   testimony concerning an unidentified cab driver's report of a recent
   encounter with the armed defendant. The testimony was admitted not for
   its truth, but to provide background information as to how and why the
   police pursued and confronted defendant (see People v Till, , 87
   NY2d 835, 837). Further, the trial court twice explicitly instructed
   the jury on the limited use it could make of the testimony and that
   the testimony was not to be considered proof of the uncharged crime.

   Finally, defendant was not unduly prejudiced by the prosecution's
   questionable remarks during summation, given the trial court's prompt
   curative instructions (cf. People v Ashwal, , 39 NY2d 105, 111).

   On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order
   affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine,
   Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.

   Decided June 6, 2002

SNIPPETS:
  • The People &c., Respondent, v. Edwin Tosca, Appellant.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the police officers' testimony
  • The testimony was admitted not for its truth, but to provide background information as to how
  • the trial court twice explicitly instructed the jury on the limited use it could make of the
  • Finally, defendant was not unduly prejudiced by the prosecution's questionable remarks during
  • On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.
  •    |