LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v J.W. BARCLAY & CO., INC., and JOHN A. BRUNO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17765, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: IT FILED WITH THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW, Defendant: J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., and John A. Bruno, Plaintiff: SEC, State: NJ New Jersey, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17765, Securities, Exchange Commission, Barclay, District, John Bruno, Civil Penalty, United States District, States District Court, Jersey, Compliance, Securities Exchange Act, Opinion, Pay, Order Directing Compliance, Alleges, President, Executive Officer, Controlling Shareholder, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Entry, Thereunder, Failing, Timely File, Form Bd-y2k , ContentID: 120254082

Case Documents
1 2002-10-02 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130909
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BARCLAY
DISTRICT
JOHN BRUNO
CIVIL PENALTY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
STATES DISTRICT COURT
JERSEY
COMPLIANCE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OPINION
PAY
LITIGATION
ORDER DIRECTING COMPLIANCE
ALLEGES
PRESIDENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
ENTRY
THEREUNDER
FAILING
TIMELY FILE
FORM BD-Y2K
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 17765 / October 2, 2002

   Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., and
   John A. Bruno, Civil Action No. 02CV3164, United States District Court
   for the District of New Jersey (filed July 1, 2001)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on July 1, 2002,
   it filed with the United States District Court for the District of New
   Jersey an Application for an Order Directing Compliance With an Order
   of the Securities and Exchange Commission Under Section 21(e) of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Commission's Application alleges
   that J.W. Barclay and Co., Inc. and John Bruno, its president,
   Executive Officer and controlling shareholder, failed to comply with
   the terms of the Commission's October 15, 2001 Opinion and Order
   Imposing Remedial Sanctions, which among other things, required J.W.
   Barclay & Co. to pay a $25,000 civil penalty within 30 days of the
   entry of the Order. In its October 15, 2001 Opinion and Order, the
   Commission found, among other things, that J.W. Barclay had willfully
   violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
   17a-5 thereunder, by failing to timely file all or part of its Form
   BD-Y2K. In this action, the Commission specifically seeks compliance
   from J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc. and John Bruno with the Commission's
   Order to pay a $25,000 civil penalty.

     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 10/03/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Litigation Release No. 17765 / October 2,
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., and John A. Bruno, Civil
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on July 1, 2002, it filed with the
  • The Commission's Application alleges that J.W. Barclay and Co., Inc. and John Bruno, its
  • In its October 15, 2001 Opinion and Order, the Commission found, among other things, that
  •    |