U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 17765 / October 2, 2002
Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., and
John A. Bruno, Civil Action No. 02CV3164, United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey (filed July 1, 2001)
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on July 1, 2002,
it filed with the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey an Application for an Order Directing Compliance With an Order
of the Securities and Exchange Commission Under Section 21(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Commission's Application alleges
that J.W. Barclay and Co., Inc. and John Bruno, its president,
Executive Officer and controlling shareholder, failed to comply with
the terms of the Commission's October 15, 2001 Opinion and Order
Imposing Remedial Sanctions, which among other things, required J.W.
Barclay & Co. to pay a $25,000 civil penalty within 30 days of the
entry of the Order. In its October 15, 2001 Opinion and Order, the
Commission found, among other things, that J.W. Barclay had willfully
violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
17a-5 thereunder, by failing to timely file all or part of its Form
BD-Y2K. In this action, the Commission specifically seeks compliance
from J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc. and John Bruno with the Commission's
Order to pay a $25,000 civil penalty.
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 10/03/2002
SNIPPETS:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 17765 / October 2,
Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.W. Barclay & Co., Inc., and John A. Bruno, Civil
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on July 1, 2002, it filed with the
The Commission's Application alleges that J.W. Barclay and Co., Inc. and John Bruno, its
In its October 15, 2001 Opinion and Order, the Commission found, among other things, that
|