LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v STEVEN E. THORN, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17772, CourtName: APRIL 29, 2002 COURT ORDER, Defendant: Steven E. Thorn, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: OH Ohio, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17772, Thorn, Foreign Bank Records, Commission, Contempt, Motion, Civil Contempt, Ohio, Securities, Exchange Commission, Violation, Judge, Trading, European Banks, Alleges, District, Receiver, Order Stemming, Ordered Thorn, Control, Foreign Banking Laws, Evidentiary Hearing, Honorable Edmund, Sargus, United States District, Southern District, Deferred Ruling, Newly Appointed Receiver, Revisit, Impose Sanctions , ContentID: 120254075

Case Documents
1 2002-10-07 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130902
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FOREIGN BANK RECORDS
COMMISSION
CONTEMPT
MOTION
COURT
CIVIL CONTEMPT
OHIO
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
VIOLATION
JUDGE
TRADING
EUROPEAN BANKS
ALLEGES
DISTRICT
RECEIVER
ORDER STEMMING
ORDERED THORN
CONTROL
FOREIGN BANKING LAWS
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
HONORABLE EDMUND
SARGUS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
DEFERRED RULING
NEWLY APPOINTED RECEIVER
REVISIT
IMPOSE SANCTIONS
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17772 / OCTOBER 7, 2002

   THE COMMISSION FILED A CIVIL CONTEMPT MOTION FILED AGAINST STEVEN E.
   THORN FOR FAILING TO PRODUCE FOREIGN BANK RECORDS IN VIOLATION OF
   APRIL 29, 2002 COURT ORDER

   , No. C2-01-290 (Judge Sargus)(S.D. Ohio)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a
   motion for civil contempt against defendant Steven E. Thorn for
   violating an April 29, 2002 Court Order in July 24, 2002. Thorn, a
   resident of the Cleveland suburb of Brecksville, Ohio, is charged with
   having fraudulently raised over $70 million from hundreds of victims
   purportedly to finance trading in notes issued by European banks. The
   Commission has alleged that the supposed European bank trading venture
   does not exist and that Thorn in fact conducted a ponzi scheme. The
   Commission sued Thorn and others on April 2, 2001 and obtained a
   temporary restraining order which included a provision freezing all of
   Thorn's assets.

   In the Court's April 29, 2002 Order stemming from Thorn's last
   contempt hearing on April 5, 2002, the Court had ordered Thorn, among
   other things, to produce all foreign bank records within his control.
   On July 24, 2002, the Commission filed a new motion for civil contempt
   against Thorn after he failed to provide any foreign bank records to
   the Commission. Thorn alleges that he cannot obtain his foreign bank
   records under foreign banking laws.

   On September 6, 2002, after an evidentiary hearing on the Commission's
   July 24, 2002 contempt motion, the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.,
   United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio,
   deferred ruling on the Commission's motion and directed the newly
   appointed receiver to obtain those foreign bank records. In the event
   the receiver obtains the foreign bank records, the Court will revisit
   the Commission's contempt motion and decide whether to impose
   sanctions against Thorn at that time.


     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 10/08/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • THE COMMISSION FILED A CIVIL CONTEMPT MOTION FILED AGAINST STEVEN E. THORN FOR FAILING TO
  • , No. C2-01-290 (Judge Sargus)(S.D.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a motion for civil
  • Thorn, a resident of the Cleveland suburb of Brecksville, Ohio, is charged with having
  • In the Court's April 29, 2002 Order stemming from Thorn's last contempt hearing on April 5,
  • Thorn alleges that he cannot obtain his foreign bank records under foreign banking laws.
  • On September 6, 2002, after an evidentiary hearing on the Commission's July 24, 2002 contempt
  • In the event the receiver obtains the foreign bank records, the Court will revisit the
  •    |