LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v TANNER, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17790, CourtName: ADDITION, THE COURT ORDERED TANNER TO PAY $2,145,167.65 IN, Defendant: Tanner, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17790, Tanner, Securities, Evans, Exchange, Boston, Scheme, Exchange Commission, Act, Fraud, Judgments, Market Manipulation Scheme, Pay, Disgorgement, Prejudgment, Civil Penalty, Dennis Evans, Michael Boston, District, Stock, Price, Promulgated Thereunder, Court Ordered Tanner, Serving, Officer, Jury, Wire Fraud, Tax Fraud, Money Laundering , ContentID: 120254057

Case Documents
1 2002-10-17 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130884
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
EVANS
EXCHANGE
BOSTON
SCHEME
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ACT
FRAUD
JUDGMENTS
MARKET MANIPULATION SCHEME
PAY
DISGORGEMENT
PREJUDGMENT
CIVIL PENALTY
LITIGATION
DENNIS EVANS
MICHAEL BOSTON
DISTRICT
STOCK
PRICE
DEFENDANTS
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
COURT ORDERED TANNER
SERVING
OFFICER
JURY
WIRE FRAUD
TAX FRAUD
MONEY LAUNDERING
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17790 / October 17, 2002

   COMMISSION OBTAINS DEFAULT JUDGMENTS AGAINST MAX TANNER, DENNIS EVANS,
   AND MICHAEL BOSTON IN MARKET MANIPULATION SCHEME

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. TANNER, ET AL., 02-CIV-0306
   (S.D.N.Y.)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that
   the Honorable William H. Pauley, United States District Judge for the
   Southern District of New York, entered Default Judgments against
   Dennis Evans ("Evans") on July 29, 2002, Max C. Tanner ("Tanner") on
   August 12, 2002, and Michael Boston ("Boston") on October 10 , 2002 in
   connection with a market manipulation scheme.

   The Commission's Complaint alleges that Tanner, Evans, Boston, and
   others engaged in a scheme to manipulate the stock price of Maid Aide,
   Inc. ("MDAN"), a publicly traded shell company. To facilitate the
   scheme, the defendants gained control of MDAN, set up two boiler room
   operations, and directed unlicensed brokers to sell unregistered stock
   at artificially inflated prices, using high-pressure sales tactics, in
   exchange for undisclosed kickbacks. Through this scheme, the
   defendants defrauded investors out of more than $3.7 million.

   The judgments enjoin Tanner, Evans, and Boston from future violations
   of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
   ("Securities Act"), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
   1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. In
   addition, the Court ordered Tanner to pay $2,145,167.65 in
   disgorgement, $616,149.47 in prejudgment interest, and a $350,000
   civil penalty. Evans must pay $119,396.67 in disgorgement, $37,250.56
   in prejudgment interest, and a $126,500 civil penalty. Boston must pay
   $150,000 in disgorgement, $53,745.49 in prejudgment interest, and a
   $175,000 civil penalty. Tanner and Evans also are barred from ever
   serving as an officer or director of a public company.

   In November 2001, Tanner and Evans were convicted by a jury in a
   related criminal case. Tanner was convicted of 37 counts of securities
   fraud, mail and wire fraud, tax fraud, and money laundering. Evans was
   convicted of securities fraud.

   See also Litigation Releases (January 14, 2002), (August 13, 2002),
   and (September 11, 2002).


     _________________________________________________________________
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • COMMISSION OBTAINS DEFAULT JUDGMENTS AGAINST MAX TANNER, DENNIS EVANS, AND MICHAEL BOSTON IN
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the Honorable William H. Pauley, United
  • The Commission's Complaint alleges that Tanner, Evans, Boston, and others engaged in a scheme
  • To facilitate the scheme, the defendants gained control of MDAN, set up two boiler room
  • The judgments enjoin Tanner, Evans, and Boston from future violations of Sections 5, 5, and
  • In addition, the Court ordered Tanner to pay $2,145,167.65 in disgorgement, $616,149.47 in
  • Tanner and Evans also are barred from ever serving as an officer or director of a public
  • Tanner and Evans were convicted by a jury in a related criminal case.
  • Tanner was convicted of 37 counts of securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, tax fraud, and
  • See also Litigation Releases,, and.
  •    |