LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PHILIP DEE v KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: PDVKSRC202971, CourtName: MA DC, Plaintiff: PHILIP DEE, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>PDVKSRC202971, Price Waterhouse, Settlement, Kendall, Motion, Square, Request, Bar Order, Class Plaintiffs, Production, Transcripts, Audit, Securities, Coopers, Settling Defendants, Connection, Financial Statements, Ksr, Damages, Pro Tanto, Exhibit, Compel, Related Exhibits, Stipulation, Business Development Group, Acs, Price, Employees, Comparative Fault Bar, Non-settling Defendants, Amount, Discovery, Judgement, Accounting Practices, High Technology Business, High-tech, Manuals, Memorandum , ContentID: 120254001

Case Documents
1   MEM FOR SETTLEMENT BAR ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130788
21 pages
PDF
2 1997-10-29 CIVIL COVER SHEET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130776
4 pages
PDF
3 1997-03-21 PLF RPLY SUP MTC DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130805
8 pages
PDF
4 1997-03-14 DEF OPP PLF MTC PROD DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130782
15 pages
PDF
5 1997-02-06 PLF SUP MTC PROD DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130807
30 pages
PDF
6 1997-02-06 PLF MTN TO COMPEL DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130801
4 pages
PDF
7 1997-01-17 RAINER AFFIDAVIT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130810
9 pages
PDF
9 1996-04-29 PLF RPLY SUP CLASS CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130804
13 pages
PDF
10 1996-04-18 MEM SUP PLF MTN ORD DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130789
18 pages
PDF
11 1996-04-01 PW OPP TO PLF CLASS CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130808
19 pages
PDF
12 1996-02-21 DEF OPP TO PROD DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130783
16 pages
PDF
13 1996-02-07 PLF ORD FR PROD DEF DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130802
19 pages
PDF
14 1995-07-26 PLF RPLY SUP PROD DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130806
10 pages
PDF
15 1995-07-25 PLF MEM OPP MTN COMP DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130796
16 pages
PDF
16 1995-07-18 DEF OPP MTN PROD DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130781
12 pages
PDF
17 1995-06-28 REP OF DIST OF FUNDS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130811
3 pages
PDF
18 1995-06-26 PLF MTN COMP DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130799
5 pages
PDF
19 1995-06-26 PLF MEM REG PROD DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130797
15 pages
PDF
20 1995-05-31 PW RESP TP ORD DIST FUNDS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130809
4 pages
PDF
22 1994-12-29 PLF MTN FR CLASS CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130800
6 pages
PDF
23 1994-12-29 PLF MEM FR CLASS CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130792
28 pages
PDF
24 1994-12-01 ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130775
29 pages
PDF
26 1994-11-13 CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130778
70 pages
PDF
28 1994-10-31 PLF RPLY MEM SUP BAR ORDR
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130803
7 pages
PDF
29 1994-10-27 PLF MEM OPP MTD COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130795
8 pages
PDF
30 1994-10-20 DEF RPLY PLF OPP MTD
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130785
21 pages
PDF
31 1994-10-11 DEF RESP PLF MEM BAR ORDR
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130784
33 pages
PDF
32 1994-10-05 PLF MEM OPP DEF MTD COMP
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130794
43 pages
PDF
33 1994-09-15 PLF MEM IN SUP BAR ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130793
27 pages
PDF
34 1994-07-28 ORD OF FINAL APPROVAL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130791
7 pages
PDF
35 1994-07-26 AFFIDAVIT OF CASEY
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130773
3 pages
PDF
36 1994-07-22 PLF MEM SUP PRPSED STLMNT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130798
27 pages
PDF
37 1994-07-12 DEF MTN FR STLMNT BAR ORD
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130780
8 pages
PDF
38 1994-07-12 AFFIDAVIT CANNON
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130772
6 pages
PDF
39 1994-06-29 DEF MTD COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130779
6 pages
PDF
40 1993-10-29 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130777
30 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 40 documents , 627 pages
Price: $ 199.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEM FOR SETTLEMENT BAR ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WASSMANN
KARL
PARTY
POPE0
DORR
HALE
REEDER
LARRY
MARKS
ARTHUR
COOPER
ROBERT
CONGLETON
WILLIAM
CABOT
LOUIS
GARRISON
WHARTON
RIFKIND
WEISS
PAUL
SQUARE RESEARCH CORPORATION
KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
DEFENDANTS
i           1-b
                                                                   UNITED                STATES 
      1                                                                  DISTRICT                 



                    IN  RE:         KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH
                    CORP.  SECURITIES                           LITIGATION
                                                                                                   
on           No.
                                                                                                   
                    THIS  DOCUMENT  RELATES  TO:
                    ALL  ACTIONS



                                                               MEMORANDUM  IN  SUPPORT  OF  SETTLING
                                               DEFENDANTS'                        MOTION  FOR 
 ORDER


                                The  Settling                     Defendants1                      
             in  support                of

                    their         Motion             for        a  Settlement                      
    any  and  all

                    pending             or  potential                     claims-over              
                of

                    indemnification,                            contribution                       
ainst             any  of  the

                    Settling               Defendants                    by  any  Person           
    Defendantm3





                    1            Unless         defined                  herein,                 
       used          in  this
                    Memorandum                 correspond                       to  the  defined   
th            in  the
                    Stipulation                 of  Settlement.                              A 
              terms         is
                    attached               as  Exhibit                   A.

                    2            Class         Plaintiffs                       have        joined 
SNIPPETS:
  • Defendants.
  • memorandum.
  • KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH CORPORATION
  • By its attorneys,
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
  • LOUIS W. CABOT, WILLIAM H. CONGLETON, ROBERT S. COOPER, ARTHUR
  • J. MARKS and LARRY E. REEDER
  • Hale and Dorr
  • Sew.4 upon the attorney of record for each o?her party
  • KARL G. WASSMANN III

  • 2 . CIVIL COVER SHEET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    COURT
    FMM
    GOVERNMENT
    BOSTON
    HABER
    SHAPIRO
    IAN0
    ROBERT
    IZUZEONE
    BOSTONR ADDRES
    UIMNYR
    SHAPGRO G-RACE
    WPE ORPM
    RECORO
    ANORNEY
    SIGNATURE
    DOCKET
    JUOGE
    MMUCBONS
    VIII
    ONC
    JURY DEMAND
    UNOER
    COMPLAINTI
    ONTY
    CNECK
    CUSS
    IIS
    
    JS  44
    (Rev.  07/96)
    
    
    
    
    
    I (a)  PIAlNTlFFS
      Philin                            Dee
      Robert                             Rosennberg                                 and
      David                           Zatt
                                                                                                       
         S.  Cooner,
    
                                                                                                       
    eeder
    
                                                                                     I         `,,`,:; 
    (b)
                                                                                                       
    sex
                    COUNTY             OF  RESIDENCE                   OF  FIRST  LISTED               
                          COUNIY              OF  RESIOENCE                         `bF  FiAST-LISh&   
                                                   (EXCEPT             IN  U.S.  PLAINTIFF             
                                                                                  (IN  U.S.  PLAINTIFF 
                    Connecticut                                         (out  of  state)
                          NOTE:           IN  IAN0             CONDEMNATION                         
      OF  THE
    
                                          TRACT  OF  IAN0                          INVOLVED
    
    
    (c)             ATTORNEYS                (FIRM      NAME.  ADDRESS.                        AN0     
                     t  AmOANEYS                         (IF  KNOWN)
                    Thomas  G.  Shapiro
                    Shapiro,                           Grace,                           Haber          
                    75  State                           Street
                    Boston,                        MA  02109
                     (6171                   d19-1919
    II.  BASlS  OF  JURlSDlCTlON                                                                       
            Ill.  CITlZENSHlP                                    OF  PRINCIPAL                         
    IR*fLyIX  rar*mx
    
                     (For  Oiitity               Cases         Only)                                   
    0  1 U.S. Govemllltent                                                       8  3 hid              
                    Plalntltf                                                                (U.S. 
                                                                    FTF            Dff
                      PTl=  DEF
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Dee Robert
  • (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF
  • NOTE: IN IAN0 CONDEMNATION
  • Thomas G. Shapiro
  • Boston,
  • 04 z4 0 2 U.S. Government
  • fmm (3 4 Retnstated 01
  • Appallam Court
  • CHECK IF ~;IIS IS A CUSS
  • Cneck YES onty il demanded
  • COMPLAINTi
  • UNOER EA.C.P 23
  • JURY DEMAND:
  • ONC
  • VIII.;EA%;ED
  • (see mmucbons):
  • JUOGE
  • DOCKET NUMBER
  • SIGNATURE
  • OF AnORNEY
  • OF RECORO
  • E'LSUE 'WPE ORPm AWRNEY'S NAME Thomas- e.
  • Shapgro G-race 'Haber & Uimnyr '75 S`ta,te St., BoStOnr ADDRES
  • 9';;r21;13 IZUZEONE NO. 439--3939

  • 3 . PLF RPLY SUP MTC DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMPEL
    SQUARE TAX WORKPAPERS
    SQUARE ACCOUNT
    COMPEL PRODUCTION
    MOTION
    KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH
    
                                                                                                       
         /
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
        ,.-.'
                                           UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT                             
                                                DISTRICT  OF  MASSACHUSETTS                            
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
    In  re:                                                        . . .
    KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH  CORP.  ;  C.A.  No.  93-12352-EFH
    SECURITIES             LITIGATION                              :
    
                            PLAINTIFFS'               REPLY  MEMORANDUM  IN  SUPPORT  OF
                         THEIR  MOTION  TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION  OF  DOCUMENTS
              Pursuant              to  the  Order  approved                      by  the  Court  on 
        24,
    
    1997,  the  plaintiffs                         submit      this           reply        memorandum 
    
    respond  to  a  number  of  points                             made  by  the  defendant            
    to  plaintiffs'                  Motion         to  Compel  the  Production                        
    
    Most  of  the  arguments                        made  by  the  defendant                         
    discovery             sought  are  so  flawed                       that  it  is  obvious          
    
    defendant's                  sole  purpose            is  to  further                  drive       
    
    litigating             this       case.          The  defendant                     has  previously
    plaintiffs             to  the  burden  of  moving  to  compel  discovery                          
    in  this          case  (docket             nos.  89,  119,  128,  and  150);  the  Court  has
    granted           the  plaintiffs'                motions                to  compel  four  times.  
    plaintiffs             respectfully                request               that  the  Court  do  so 
    time.
    
              1.         Plaintiffs'               Motion        to  Compel  is  Certainly             
              The  defendant's                  claim         that  the  plaintiffs'                   
    is  untimely            is  disingenuous,                    to  put  it  politely.                
    occasions            since  October               1996,  the  parties                      jointly 
    the  Court  extend  the  discovery                                period             in  this      
    
    occasion,            the  plaintiffs                  specifically                   advised       
    
    their          intention          to  file        the  instant                motion             to
    
    
    defendant               raised          no  objection.                       Indeed,           
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH CORP.; C.A.
  • THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  • Square account.
  • Square Tax Workpapers.

  • 4 . DEF OPP PLF MTC PROD DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LERACH
    HYNES
    LIB-2
    CONFIDENCES
    PERSONNEL
    UNTIMELV
    
                                                     UNITED           STATES  DISTRICT                 
                                                        DISTRICT                OF  MASSACHUSETTS
                                                                      ORAL  ARGUMENT
    
    
    
    IN  RE  KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH  )                                                          
    CORP.  SECURITIES                          LITIGATION                              )          
              ,.',
                                                                                       1           ORAL
                                 ':,I  '1
    
                     ,,.._
    
                       -. ,,
    
    
                      ,L.'
    
                         ::
                                        DEFENDANT'S                  MEMORANDUM  IN  OPPOSITION        
                    PLAINTIFFS'                      MOTION  TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION                    
    
                        '.'..
    
                         ,,."I
    
                                 '
               Defendant,                    Price          Waterhouse                          LLP 
               opposes
    
                               1.
    
                                 _<
    
                                       ~-"
    Plaintiffs'                   untimely                 Motion             to  Compel               
    
    
    ("Plaintiffs'                         Motion").
    
               By  order                  of  the          Court,             fact             
                     ended
    
    on  January                 20,  1997.                  Weeks  later,                         
           filed
    
    their           latest              motion,            in  which              they             now 
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Untimelv
  • personnel.
  • confidences.
  • LIB-2 /0219478.01
  • 7th Floor
  • Hynes & Lerach

  • 5 . PLF SUP MTC PROD DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    KENDALL
    SQUARE
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    PRODUCTION
    PRIVILEGE
    EXHIBIT
    ATTORNEY
    LITIGATION
    DEFENDANT
    PARTNER
    COMPEL PRODUCTION
    UNITED STATES
    SQUARE ACCOUNT
    MOTION
    TIBBETTS
    REPORTS
    PERSONNEL
    COUNSEL
    WITHHELD
    MEMORANDUM
    CLIENTS
    DISCOVERY
    PURPOSE
    EVIDENCE
    ANTICIPATION
    SECURITIES
    SQUARE RESEARCH
    ACCOUNTING
    
                                    :,,                    ,.,"
    
                                                 .,                 ,"
    
                                       ,", "
                                                                      UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT         
    '  :            /`l      8,
    
                            8,
    
                             1,.
    
                                     _,,,
    
                                            ! " ,  "- -
    
                                              ( 1 ":.  ',  ,  ;'
                                                                        DISTRICT  OF  MASSACHUSETTS
                                                                           .
                                                                                                       
    -,,( '-'
                                                                                                       
     &  jj  ; 3
    
                                             iti  -2.; -;;  j -;,.;,
    
                                                        *+ ,IJ I.;; j  d !
    
    -"----"-`-`-`--------"-----------x
    
    
             ,,
    
    
                                                                                                   :
    IN  RE  KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH                                                              :   
    CORP.  SECURITIES                                               LITIGATION                     :   
                                                                                                   :
    
    
                                                               PLAINTIFFS'            MEMORANDUM  IN 
                                                         MOTION  TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION  OF  DOCUMENTS
    
                                           The  plaintiffs              submit         this       
    heir
    
    motion                                        to  compel  production                    of 
                                            the
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT
  • IN RE KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH
  • LITIGATION
  • PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  • documents withheld by the defendant
  • Price Waterhouse to fall within an asserted
  • the personnel
  • Square account
  • discovery of each of these
  • as Exhibit 1 to this memorandum.
  • and the Court
  • Attorney
  • In its privilege
  • it to the Securities and Exchange
  • for Counsel"
  • *Iin anticipation
  • purpose motivating
  • and accounting
  • partner prepared these notes in the course

  • 6 . PLF MTN TO COMPEL DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PETER
    DEPUTY CLERK
    MCGARRY
    MORIN JANET
    RAINER CHRISTINE
    ANDREW
    URMY
    THOMAS
    LAW
    MEMORANDUM
    
                                          UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT,  !"> ":m
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
                                                 DISTRICT  OF  MASSACHUSETTS  "'  " ~  "'  --
    
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                           :
    IN  RE  KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH                                      :       Civil        Action 
    CORP.  SECURITIES                   LITIGATION                         :       93-12352-EFH
                                                                           :
    --'------"'----""------------x
    
    
    
                PLAINTIFFS'               MOTION  TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION  OF  DOCUMENTS
    
             The  plaintiffs                hereby             move  for  an  order                
    
    defendant          Price           Waterhouse              to  produce            the  following   
         it
    
    has  refused           to  produce:
    
             1.        items           9-12,       14-15,            21-26,        and  28-36  on  the 
                       log  supplied                by  Price            Waterhouse               (a 
    
                       submitted            as  Exhibit                 1  to  the  accompanying       
    
             2.        the  semi-monthly                       reports           generated         
                       1994  showing                the  billings                  of  the  two  Price 
                       partners            assigned                 to  work  on  the  account         
                       Square  Research                      Corporation              ("Kendall        
                       relative            amount  of  time  they  devoted                             
                       Kendall           Square;
    
             3.        the  personnel                     files       of  five        Price      
                       and  employees                     who  worked  on  the  Kendall                
                       in  1992  and  1993;  and
    
             4.        the  work  papers                     generated             by  Price       
                       connection                with        its  tax  work  for  Kendall              
                       1991,  1992  and  1993.
    
    In  support          of  this          motion,             the  plaintiffs                  submit 
    
    memorandum  of  law.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • memorandum of law.
  • Thomas V. Urmy, Jr.
  • Andrew A. Rainer Christine E. Morin Janet M. McGarry
  • Deputy Clerk
  • Dear Peter:
  • the Court.

  • 7 . RAINER AFFIDAVIT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMPEL
    PETER
    DEPUTY CLERK
    MCGARRY
    MORIN JANET
    RAINER CHRISTINE
    ANDREW
    FLOOR
    OBJECTION
    
                                           UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                                                 DISTRICT            OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    In  re:                                                           : :
    KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH  CORP.  :  C.A.  No.  93-12352-EFH
    SECURITIES             LITIGATION                                 :
    
                                                 AFFIDAVIT           OF  ANDREW  RAINER
    
               I,  Andrew             Rainer,             having      been  duly  sworn,               
    
    state:
    
               1.         I  am  one  of  the                        counsel           for      the    
    
    referenced              case,        and  am  submitting                        this      
    Plaintiffs'               Motion              to       Compel              Production           of 
    February             6,  1997.
    
               2.         Counsel         for  the  plaintiffs                       intentionally     
    the  Motion            to  Compel  until                 the  end  of  discovery                   
    
    it       was  necessary               to  establish                        a  record        through
    
    support             our  entitlement                    to  obtain             several         of 
    documents             sought        in  the  motion.                       This  is  evidenced     
    
    attached             to  the  Motion,                    and  the  arguments                       
    
    Memorandum  in  Support                         of  the  Motion                 to  Compel.
    
               3.         I  negotiated                  with  Peter  Casey,  one  of  the  counsel    
    
    defendant,             four        joint        requests                  to  extend       the 
    
    this       case.          Each  time                  I  discussed              extending          
    
    Casey,  I  specifically                        told  him  of  plaintiffs'                      
    
    motion            to  compel,         and  Mr.  Casey  raised                        no  objection.
    
               4.         I  discussed             the  last          of  the  four  extension         
    
    Mr.  Casey  on  January                         16,  1997,  and  on  that                          
    
    expected            to  serve  the  motion                       on  him  llshortly.ll             
    
    
                                                                                           - .- --
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH CORP.: C.A.
  • made no objection.
  • 7th Floor
  • Andrew A. Rainer Christine E. Morin Janet M. McGarry
  • Deputy Clerk
  • Dear Peter:
  • Compel.

  • 9 . PLF RPLY SUP CLASS CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BERSHAD
    NEWBERG
    CCH
    COMMITTEE
    FEFFER LLP
    WECHSLER HARWOOD HALIEBIAN
    DAVID
    LERACH LLP
    HYNES
    MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
    GLEN DEVALERIO
    TABACCO
    DOCUMENTWASSERVEDUPONTHEATTORNEYOFRECORD
    COMPLAINT
    INAPPROPRIATE
    CLASS ACTIONS
    HERBERT
    
                                                IN  THE  UNITED     STATES  DISTRICT             COURT
                                                 FOR  THE  DISTRICT      OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
                                                                                                       
    -__________________________________I___
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    IN  RE:                  KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH                                ;                
    CORPO-TION                            SECURITIES      LITIGATION                  )    
                                                                                      1                
                                                                                                       
      ,,
    _____________________________t_________
    
    ,,       :
    
     : ~
    
    
    
    
    
                                         PLAINTIFFS'       REPLY  MEMORANDW  IN  SUPPORT  OF
                                                THEIR  MOTION  FOR  CLASS  CERTIFICATION
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                            SHAPIRO  GRACE  HABER  & 
                                                                            75  State           Street
                                                                            Boston,            MA  02109
                                                                            (617)           439-3939
    
                                                                            BERMAN,  DeVALERIO,        
                                                                              &  TABACCO
                                                                            One  Liberty               
                                                                            Boston,            MA  02109
                                                                             (617)          542-8300
    
                                                                            MILBERG  WEISS  BERSHAD
                                                                              HYNES  &  LERACH  LLP
                                                                            One  Pennsylvania          
                                                                            New  York,            N.Y. 
                                                                             (212)          594-5300
    
                                                                            WECHSLER  HARWOOD  HALEBIAN
                                                                              &  FEFFER  LLP
                                                                            805  Third            Avenue
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) 1 92,462
  • Herbert B. Newberg, Newbers On Class Actions § 22.51.
  • is inappropriate.
  • complaint.
  • DOCUMENTWASSERVEDUPONTHEATTORNEYOFRECORD
  • & TABACCO
  • Glen DeValerio
  • MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
  • HYNES & LERACH LLP
  • David J. Bershad
  • WECHSLER HARWOOD HALIEBIAN
  • & FEFFER LLP
  • Committee

  • 10 . MEM SUP PLF MTN ORD DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COOPERS
    AUDIT
    KSR
    BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT GROUP
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    HIGH TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS
    HIGH-TECH
    EXHIBIT
    PRODUCTION
    REQUEST
    HIGH-TECH CLIENTS
    DEFENDANT
    MOTION
    CONNECTION
    CAMBRIDGE
    ENTREPRENEURS
    NATIONAL GROUP
    FY91
    FY92
    LOCAL ESC
    WORKPAPERS
    ORNL
    FIRST DOCUMENT REQUEST
    RESPONSIBILITIES
    DEFENDANT PRICE WATERHOUSE
    MASSACHUSETTS
    ACCOUNTING
    KENDALL SQUARE
    PRACTICES
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                      UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT                                  
                                FOR  THE  DISTRICT  OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                                                       
                      MEMORANDUM                 OF LAW  IN  SUPPORT  OF PLAINTIFFS'
                MOTION  FOR  AN  ORDER  COMPELLING                              THE  PRODUCTION        
                  DOCUMENTS  BY  DEFENDANT  PRICE  WATERHOUSE.                                         
    
                      Plaintiffs  submit  this Memorandum  of Law  in support of their  motion  for  an
    
    order pursuant to Fed. R.  Civ.  P. 37 compelling  defendant Price Waterhouse,  L.L.P.  ("PW")
    
    to produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs'  First  Request for  Production  of Documents
    
    Directed  to Defendant Price Waterhouse (the "First  Document  Request,"  Exhibit  1 hereto).
    
    The documents at issue fall  into three categories:
    
                      1.        Documents  from  PW's  high technology  practice group or other similar
    
    group.  These documents include:  (i)  documents from  PW's  High  Technology  Business
    
    Development  Group,  including  any local  or national  group,  that was responsible for  PW's
    
    business development  and which  assisted its high-tech clients  such as Kendall  Square Research
    
    Corporation  ("KSR"  or the "Company");  and (ii)  documents from  PW's  Entrepreneurial
    
    Services Center ("ESC")  located in  Cambridge,  Massachusetts;'
    
                       2.        PW's  fiscal  1991 audit workpapers;  and
    
                       3.        Documents  and communications  between PW  and Coopers &  Lybrand,
    
    L.L.P.  ("Coopers")  in connection with  Coopers'  audit of KSR's  financial  statements.  These
    
    
    
             1  To  the  extent  that  PW's  High  Technology  Business  Development  Group,  including
    group,  and PW's  local  ESC  have  different  names,  plaintiffs  seek documents  from  those 
    
    
    documents and communications  concern, among other things:  (i)  an agreement to transfer
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
  • to produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' First Request for Production of Documents
  • Directed to Defendant Price Waterhouse (the "First Document Request," Exhibit 1 hereto).
  • business development and which assisted its high-tech clients such as Kendall Square Research
  • Corporation ("KSR" or the "Company"); and documents from PW's Entrepreneurial
  • Services Center located in Cambridge,
  • L.L.P. ("Coopers") in connection with Coopers' audit of KSR's financial statements.
  • To the extent that PW's High Technology Business Development Group, including any local or
  • workpapers, that Coopers transferred to PW just prior to depositions of PW's employees
  • before the Securities and Exchange Commission.2 In support of their motion,
  • KSR's FY92 financial statements were presented in accordance with generally accepted
  • In December 1994, unable to recover from the massive accounting fraud, KSR
  • PW's FY91 WorkDaDers and Document Exchanges With Coopers
  • recognition practices as evidenced by equipment deliveries to ORNL;5 Coopers'
  • workpapers indicate that the same contingencies that required the restatement of the ORNL
  • Cambridge location because of its accessibility to local high-tech entrepreneurs caused, in
  • the interlocking responsibilities of Mr. Tibbetts and Mr. Gray,

  • 11 . PW OPP TO PLF CLASS CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STUART
    FLOOR
    LERACH
    HYNES
    MASS
    SUBCLASS
    DAMAGES
    
                                               UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT                          COURT
                                                  DISTRICT             OF  MASSACHUSETTS.  .  .
                                                                                    1         CIVIL    
    IN  RE:           KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH                                              
    CORP.  SECURITIES                       LITIGATION                              ; 1  ORAL  ARGUMENT
    
                                        PRICE  WATERHOUSE  LLP'S  OPPOSITION                           
                               PLAINTIFFS'                  MOTION  FOR  CLASS  CERTIFICATION
    
               Price           Waterhouse                 LLP  ("Price             Waterhouse")        
    
    submits           this        limited           opposition              to  Plaintiffs'            
    
    Certification                       ("Plaintiffs'                Motion").               For  the 
    
    below,          this        Court  should                 conditionally                  certify   
    
    plaintiff's                 federal            claims        pursuant             to  Fed.  R. 
    
    23(c)  (4)  w  -  The  proposed                              class           should        be 
    
    subclasses                 as  to  the  Section                    11  and  Section                
    
    Plaintiffs'                 motion           should         be  denied                as  to  the 
    
    claims.              Furthermore,                     at  this       time,            the  Court 
    
    Order  requiring                       plaintiffs               to  file        an  amended 
    
    consistent                 with        the  far  narrower                     scope  of  this      
    
    substantial                 part         to  the  Court's               prior           ruling     
    
    Waterhouse's                  motion           to  dismiss,             than  is  reflected        
    
    Consolidated                  Amended  Complaint.                             Fed.  R.  Civ.       
    
                                                                     BACKGROUND
    
                In  this          matter,            plaintiffs             assert            that     
    
    violated             SlO(b)            of  the  Securities                     Exchange           
    
    violated             Sll  of  the  Securities                          Act  of  1933  and  (iii)   
    
    
    common  law  l~deceitll                        by  issuing,             in  March  1993,  an 
    
    audit           report        on  Kendall                Square  Research                  Corp.'s 
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • damages.
  • subclass).
  • Mass.
  • Hynes & Lerach
  • 49th Floor
  • Stuart D. Wechsler

  • 12 . DEF OPP TO PROD DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PRICE WATERHOUSE
    DISCOVERY
    MOTION
    REQUEST
    PRODUCTION
    AUDIT
    ACCOUNTING
    SQUARE
    MATERIALS
    KENDALL
    MANUALS
    COURT
    STANDARDS
    GUIDANCE
    COMPEL
    BURDENSOME
    EXHIBITS
    WORKPAPERS
    RESPONDING
    REASONS
    SECURITIES
    MASS
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    LITERATURE
    LITIGATION
    AUDITING
    OBJECTIONS
    ASSERTING
    
                                                                                            UNITED     
                                  COURT
                                                                                                  
    USETTS
    
    
    
    
    .   -,
    
                                                                                               -,.i    
     --
    
    
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                         ,-
                    -
    
    
                                                                                                       
            ..'
    
                                                                       . ,
    .          ..*                     .           ..*                      l             .        ..* 
             .                                                                                         
                          I-
    
                                                                         !      '
    
    
                                                                                                       
    
    IN  RE:                            KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH
               :                      CIVIL         ACTION         NO.
    CORP.  SECURITIES                                                                    LITIGATION
                                      93-12352-H                                                       
    
               .
    
               .
    
      .         .      .        .        l         .         .       .            .         .       l  
    .          .                                                                                       
    
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH
  • CORP. SECURITIES
  • LITIGATION
  • DEFENDANT PRICE WATERHOUSE L.L.P.'S
  • TO PLAINTIFFS'
  • MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING
  • THE PRODUCTION
  • to Compel").
  • For the reasons
  • Square's financial statements
  • fiscal 1993, this Court
  • Mass.
  • the request,
  • with its objections,
  • its audit
  • and accounting
  • that these materials
  • discovery.
  • auditing, accounting
  • of pages of workpapers
  • the SEC used as exhibits
  • .I' In responding
  • err in asserting
  • audit literature
  • and Unduly Burdensome.

  • 13 . PLF ORD FR PROD DEF DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    REQUEST
    DEFENDANT
    KENDALL
    ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
    PRODUCTION
    CONNECTION
    MANUALS
    TRANSCRIPTS
    MOTION
    EXHIBIT
    LITIGATION
    PWS
    PRICE WATERHOUSE
    FIRST REQUEST
    SECURITIES
    TESTIMONY
    DISCOVERY
    UNITED STATES
    PROFESSIONAL LITERATURE
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    PRODUCING
    EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    KENDALL SQUARE
    OBJECTION
    EMPLOYEES
    OBJECTING
    RESPONDED THERETO
    ORDER PURSUANT
    MEMORANDUM
    
                                                                                                       
    
                                          UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURTf;;;-;  `,'  (,  !-;; ;:  - :`:
                                                                                                       
                                      FOR  THE  DISTRICT  OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
           IN  RE:  KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH                                           Civil  Action 
                                                                                           93-12352-H
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                             MEMORANDUM             OF LAW  IN  SUPPORT  OF  PLAINTIFFS'               
                     MOTIoN         FOG  m      ORDER      COMPELLING          THE  pR(-,,,UCTI(-,N    
    
                       2
                       D
    
                             Plaintiffs  submit  this  Memorandum  of  Law  in  support  of  their 
    
    order  pursuant  to  Fed.  R.  Civ.  P.  37  compelling  defendant  Price  Waterhouse,  L.L.P. 
    
    to  produce  documents  responsive  to  Plaintiffs'  First  Request  for  Production  of  Documents
    
    Directed  to  Defendant  Price  Waterhouse  (the  "First  Request, "  Exhibit  A  hereto).  The
    
    documents  at issue  fall  into  two  categories:  (i)  PW's  complete  accounting/auditing  manuals
    
    and  professional  literature  concerning  practices  at issue  in  the  litigation;  and  (ii) 
    
    PW  produced  to  or  received  from  the  United  States Securities  and  Exchange  Commission 
    
    "SEC")  in  connection  with  the  SEC's  investigation  into  Kendall  Square's  accounting 
    
    including  the  "PWS"  series  of  documents.
    
    I.          INTRODUCTION
    
                             On  March  1,  1994,  plaintiffs  served  their  First  Request  on  PW. 
    
    1994,  PW  responded  thereto  (Exhibit  B hereto),  objecting  and  producing  certain  documents.
    
                             On  June  26,  1995,  plaintiffs  filed  a motion  to  compel  PW  to 
    
    transcripts  of  testimony  given  by  PW  employees  to  the  SEC,  along  with  the  exhibits 
    
    Subsequently,  this  Court  granted  plaintiffs'  motion.  In  compliance  with  the  Court's 
                                                                                                       
    motcombr.doc                                                                                       
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • order pursuant to Fed.
  • to produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' First Request for Production of Documents
  • Directed to Defendant Price Waterhouse (the "First Request, " Exhibit A hereto).
  • and professional literature concerning practices at issue in the litigation;
  • PW produced to or received from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
  • "SEC") in connection with the SEC's investigation into Kendall Square's accounting practices,
  • including the "PWS" series of documents.
  • 1994, PW responded thereto, objecting and producing certain documents.
  • On June 26, 1995, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel PW to produce the
  • transcripts of testimony given by PW employees to the SEC,
  • PW requested and/or produced the transcripts of thirteen days of testimony given by four PW
  • the depositions it conducted of PW employees in connection with its investigation into Kendall
  • has failed to produce its internal accounting and auditing manuals and professional literature
  • of Kendall Square Research Corp.`s common stock
  • of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year end 1992.
  • This Court, by its Memorandum and Order dated November 9, 1994, upheld the
  • Resenrch Corp. Securities Litigation, 868 F. Supp.
  • Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter.
  • boilerplate objection is a transparent attempt to hinder plaintiffs' investigation.
  • Defendant's assertion that producing documents to the SEC confers some type of special status

  • 14 . PLF RPLY SUP PROD DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    TRANSCRIPTS
    REQUEST
    CONTROL
    PRODUCTION
    EMPLOYEES
    COURT
    WITNESSES
    COMPEL
    MOTION
    COUNSEL
    CONERLV
    TESTIMONY
    DISCLOSURE
    CONNECTION
    ATTORNEY-CLIENT
    WORK PRODUCT
    RELATED EXHIBITS
    DEFENDANTS
    PROTECT
    PRIVILEGE
    POSSESSION
    REQUIRING
    RECOGNIZING
    ASSERT
    PERSONNEL
    SUPPORT
    COSTS
    REVIEW
    PROPOSED ORDER
    
    i
    
    
    
    
                                               UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT             COURT
                                          FOR  THE  DISTRICT          OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
            IN  RE:  KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH  CORP.                                          Civil 
            SECURITIES  LITIGATION                                                              
    
    
                                  PLAINTIFFS'        REPLY  MEMORANDUM               IN  SUPPORT  OF
                         PLAINTIFFS'       MOTION  TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION                     OF 
                                 DIRECTED         TO  DEFENDANT        PRICE  WATERHOUSE.            
    
                         Plaintiffs  respectfully  submit  this  supplemental  reply  memorandum  in 
    
          motion  to  compel.  This  memorandum  is necessary to:  1) discuss issues raised  by Price
    
          Waterhouse,  LLP's  ("PW")  opposition;  2)  clarify  plaintiffs'  position  concerning 
    
          identification  of  non-PW  personnel  examined  by the  SEC;  and  3)  correct  PW's 
    
          law  and  mischaracterizations  of  plaintiffs'  motion  to  compel.
    
                                                           I.  BACKGROUND
    
                         Before  the  Court  is Plaintiffs'  Motion  To  Compel  Production  Of 
    
          Defendant  PW  ("Motion  To  Compel").  Plaintiffs  have  moved  to  compel  the  production 
    
          documents  including  transcripts  and  related  exhibits  from  all  present  and  former 
    
          PW  who  testified  before  the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  ("SEC")  in 
    
          the  SEC's  investigation  into  Kendall  Square  Research  Corp.`s  ("KSR")  accounting 
    
          fiscal  years  1992  and  1993  (the  "SEC's  Investigation").       PW  has disclosed  to 
    
          of  four  (4)  PW  personnel  who  have  given  testimony  before  the  SEC  in  connection 
    
          investigation.  Of  the  four  (4)  PW  witnesses  who  testified  before  the  SEC, three 
    
          employees  and  one  (1)  is a former  employee.
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs respectfully submit this supplemental reply memorandum in support of their
  • 2) clarify plaintiffs' position concerning transcripts or
  • law and mischaracterizations of plaintiffs' motion to compel.
  • Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion To Compel Production Of Documents Directed To
  • documents including transcripts and related exhibits from all present and former employees of
  • PW has disclosed to counsel the names
  • of four PW personnel who have given testimony before the SEC in connection with its
  • Of the four PW witnesses who testified before the SEC,
  • employees and one is a former employee.
  • its employees are not within its "control" to arguing that if this Court concludes that
  • preventing disclosure of testimony from PW witnesses to requesting broad discovery from all
  • court order to request a copy of their SEC transcripts and turn them over to plaintiffs.
  • While recognizing that if PW requested copies of its employees' transcripts from the SEC
  • defendants resort to a distortion of both law and fact by
  • demand has possession, custody, or control of such materials within the meaning of Rule 34).
  • unilaterally imposed restrictions on disclosure.
  • Robert Conerlv
  • unable to secure the necessary cooperation from its former employee Mr. Conerly requiring
  • PW's counsel does not need thirty days to review the transcripts.
  • any privilege to which PW could assert has been waived.
  • With respect to the attorney-client privilege,
  • product rule exists to protect "written statement,
  • description and are, therefore, not shielded from discovery under the attorney work product
  • cites Herbst for the proposition that the costs of compelled production of SEC transcripts
  • PW's proposed order imposes obligations on plaintiffs that are not

  • 15 . PLF MEM OPP MTN COMP DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DAMAGES
    ACS
    MOTION
    COMPEL
    REQUEST
    COURT
    PRICE
    CLASS MEMBERS
    REASONABLY ESTIMATE
    SECURITIES
    SETTLEMENT
    ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS
    DISCOVERY
    CIV
    DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
    RELATED REQUEST
    PRODUCTION
    CLASS PERIOD
    PRICE WATERHOUSE
    DEFENDANTS
    CONNECTION
    RECOGNIZED LOSS REPORT
    CLAIMANTS
    DAMAGE ANALYSIS
    DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS PURSUANT
    REASONS SET
    SECURITIES SERVICES
    OPPOSITION
    MEMORANDUM
    
                                            UNITED             STATES  DISTRICT           COURT        
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                      FOR  THE  DISTRICT               OF  MASSACHUSETTS               
                                                                                                       
    '
     IN  RE:  KENDALL              SQUARE  RESEARCH  CORP.                                         
                                                                                                       
    
    
     SECURITIES  LITIGATION                                                                          
    `:,::
    
     `,,
    
      ,'
                                                                                                       
                                                                                    I                  
                                                                                                       
      -:  ~_^
                                                                                                       
      ;, I"::
                         PLAINTIFFS'             MEMORANDUM               IN  OPPOSITION            TO 
             `: `:
                                                                                                       
       WATERH
       c                   USE  LLP'S  M  TI                                                           
    
              Plaintiffs  respectfully  submit  this  Memorandum  in  Opposition  to  Price  Waterhouse,
    
    LLP's  Motion  to  Compel  Production  of  Documents  ("Motion  to  Compel").  Price  Waterhouse,
    
    LLP's  ("Pw")  Motion  to  Compel  ostensibly  seeks the  same documents  as PW's  Request  For
    
    Production  Of  Documents  Directed  To  ACS  Financial  &  Securities  Services  (the  "Request")
    
    served  on  plaintiffs  on July  10, 1995.  For  the  reasons set forth  below  this  Court  should
    
    PW's  Motion  to  Compel  because:
    
               1.  Plaintiffs  object  to  PW's'Motion  to  Compel  and  its related  Request  because,
    
    other  things:  a) plaintiffs  have  complied  with  their  disclosure  obligations  pursuant  to 
    
    P. 26(a)(l)(C)       and  h ave  agreed  to  provide  to  PW  &            class damage 
    
    approximately  $70  million  that  reasonably  estimates  the  class'  damages  for  the  class
    
    relevant  to  this  action  --  i.e.,  March  25,  1993  through  and  including  December  3, 
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs respectfully submit this Memorandum in Opposition to Price Waterhouse,
  • LLP's Motion to Compel Production of Documents.
  • Production Of Documents Directed To ACS Financial & Securities Services (the "Request")
  • For the reasons set forth below this Court should deny
  • Plaintiffs object to PW's'Motion to Compel and its related Request because,
  • a) plaintiffs have complied with their disclosure obligations pursuant to Fed.
  • R. Civ.
  • ' In denying PW's motion to dismiss on November 9, 1994, this Court allowed plaintiffs'
  • PW's Motion to Compel improperly seeks discovery from absent class members
  • this Court approved a partial settlement of this action with the Settling
  • Defendants2 and notice was sent to the Settlement Class.
  • In connection with the partial settlement, plaintiffs' counsel designated ACS as plaintiffs'
  • Recognized Loss Report for all eligible claims totaled $87,079,892.
  • Claimants by ACS and related responses received from Claimants.
  • obtain discovery of plaintiffs' work product concerning purported damages suffered by the
  • The damage analysis prepared by plaintiffs' agent ACS also contains privileged communications
  • summaries of information that reasonably estimate the damages incurred by the PW Class,

  • 16 . DEF OPP MTN PROD DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    YORK
    WECHSLER
    STUART
    FLOOR
    LERACH
    HYNES
    CONTROL
    CONTINGENT
    
                                             UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT                    COURT
                                              DISTRICT          OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    
    
                                   PRICE  WATERHOUSE  LLP'S  OPPOSITION                                
                   PLAINTIFFS`               MOTION  TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION  OF  DOCUMENTS
    
             Price        Waterhouse             LLP  respectfully                   submits         
    
    plaintiffs          '  Motion            to  Compel  Production                   of  Documents    
    
    Defendant           Price        Waterhouse,             L.L.P.         ("Motion         to 
    
             Plaintiffs'              motion        erroneously              seeks  to  compel  Price
    
    Waterhouse            to  produce            transcripts              and  related             
    
    examinations              of  four  past  and/or                     present         Price       
    
    employees           taken  by  the  Securities                        and  Exchange              
    
    connection            with       its      investigation               of  Kendall             
    
    Corporation.                   Because  any  such  material                       is  not  in  Price
    
    Waterhouse's              possession,                custody         or  control         under 
    
    34,  the  Motion                to  Compel  must  be  denied,
    
             Alternatively,                   should       the  Court  determine                     
    
    are  entitled             to  such  materials,                   then  the  Court's                
    
    the  Motion           to  Compel  should                 further         provide         that      
    
    (as  well          as  plaintiffs)              are  entitled             to  SEC  examination
    
    transcripts              and  related           exhibits             of  the  Settling             
    
    including           Kendall         Square's           officers,          directors              
    
    any  other          persons         who  have  testified                   in  connection          
    
    
    investigation.'
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • THE TRANSCRIPTS IS CONTINGENT UPON SEC APPROVAL.
  • OVER THE SEC TRANSCRIPTS GENERALLY,
  • CONTROL OVER THE TRANSCRIPTS OF CONERLY.
  • Hynes & Lerach
  • 49th Floor New York, NY 10119
  • Stuart D. Wechsler

  • 17 . REP OF DIST OF FUNDS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    YERASI
    DISTRICT
    YORK
    COUNSEL
    SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
    WECHSLER
    BERSHAD
    SHAPIRO
    DEVALERIO
    EXHIBIT
    HERETO
    CHARLES SCHWAB
    CONFIRMATION
    RECOGNIZED LOSS
    FRAUDULENT CLAIM
    FUNDS
    REPORT
    SECURITIES
    SQUARE
    EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
    PLAINTIFFS
    MADISON AVENUE
    FEFFER
    SKIRNICK HARWOOD HALEBIAN
    WECHSLER SKIRNICK HARWOOD
    FLOOR
    PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA
    LERACH
    WEISS BERSHAD HYNES
    
                                                                                                      
                           "1  ',ljt"F,
    
                                                                                                       
       i.            ;       :.I             'i-
                                                                                                       
    
    
    
                                        UNITED       STATES  DISTRICT              COURT
                                   FOR  THE  DISTRICT            OF  MASSACHUSETTS                    
               i,;                   7:X  -i;-
    
    
    
                                                                                                       
              ,,                     :      ,,I: 1  <
                                                                           :
           IN  RE:  KENDALL          SQUARE  RESEARCH                      :         CIVIL  ACTION     
           CORP.  SECURITIES            LITIGATION                         . .       93-12352-EFH
                                                                           .
    
    
    
    
                                          STATUS  REPORT  CONCERNING
                              FINAL  DISTRIBUTION               OF  SETTLEMENT               FUNDS
    
                    The  settlement  administrator  recently  informed  counsel  for  the  Class that  a
    
           fraudulent  claim  was  submitted  by  Mr.  Ma1 Yerasi  (claim  #3868).  Mr.  Yerasi's  claim
    
           was listed  in  the  settlement  administrator's  Recognized  Loss  Report  as a valid  and
    
           accepted  claim  with  a recognized  loss of  $246,855.20.  The  settlement  administrator 
    
           confirmed  with  Charles  Schwab  that  the  trade  confirmation  slip  which  Mr.  Yerasi
    
           submitted  in  support  of  his  claim  form  is not  authentic  and  that  all  of  the 
    
           contained  therein  is false.  A  copy  of  the  letter  from  Charles  Schwab  is attached 
    
           Exhibit  A.
    
                    According  to  a June  1,  1995  article  from  the  New  York  Newsday  (Nassau
    
           Edition),  Mr.  Yerasi  has submitted  nearly  $5  million  in  fraudulent  claims  in  48 
    
           class action  cases.  A  copy  of  the  article  is attached  hereto  as Exhibit  B.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
  • STATUS REPORT CONCERNING
  • OF SETTLEMENT
  • fraudulent claim was submitted by Mr. Ma1 Yerasi.
  • accepted claim with a recognized loss of $246,855.20.
  • The settlement administrator has
  • confirmed with Charles Schwab that the trade confirmation slip which Mr. Yerasi
  • 1995 article from the New York Newsday (Nassau
  • Mr. Yerasi has submitted nearly $5 million in fraudulent claims in 48 securities
  • A copy of the article is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
  • Counsel have sent Mr. Yerasi a letter by overnight mail informing him that his
  • distribution of the settlement funds.
  • Berman, DeValerio & Pease
  • One Liberty Square
  • Shapiro Grace Haber & Urmy
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach
  • One Pennsylvania Plaza
  • .49th Floor
  • Wechsler Skirnick Harwood Halebian &
  • Feffer
  • 555 Madison Avenue
  • Plaintiffs' Executive Committee

  • 18 . PLF MTN COMP DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    REQUEST
    TRANSCRIPTS
    EXHIBITS
    YORK
    COUNSEL
    RELATED EXHIBITS
    ATTORNEYS
    MOTION
    EMPLOYEES
    PRODUCTION
    PURSUANT
    SQUARE
    CONNECTION
    COMPEL PRODUCTION
    HEREBY CERTIFY
    SAIA
    LOCAL RULE
    COURT
    RELATING
    WATERHOUSE
    PRICE
    RABIN
    TOLL
    ABBEY
    LIFSHITZ
    PHILADELPHIA
    BARRACK
    GERSTEIN
    WOLF
    
    ?
    
    
    
          *                                      UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT               COURT
                                            FOR  THE  DISTRICT           OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
                 IN  RE:  KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH  CORP.                                        
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                 SECURITIES  LITIGATION                                                              
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
     "1' `\,
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    ,m
    
            ,,
                                                                                                       
    1"~
                           PLAINTIFFS'        MOTION  TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION                      OF 
                                                                                                       
                                  DIRECTED        TO  DEFENDANT           PRICE  WATERHO  USE?  L.L.P. 
                                                                                                       
     ,/,,,,
    
              /'
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    . .
                          Pursuant  to  Fed.R.Civ.P.  37, plaintiffs  hereby  move  to  compel 
    
                including  transcripts  and related  exhibits,  from  all present  and  former 
    
                Waterhouse,  L.L.P.  ("PW")  who  testified  before  the  Securities  and Exchange 
    
                ("SEC")  in  connection  with  the  SEC's  investigation  into  Kendall  Square 
    
                (LKSR")  accounting  practices  for  fiscal  years  1992  and  1993  (the  `"SEC's 
    
                           As  grounds  for  their  motion,  plaintiffs  state that:  1) on March  1,
    
                Plaintiffs'  First  Request  For  Production  Of  Documents  Directed  To  Defendant 
    
                requesting,  among  other  things,  transcripts  and  related  exhibits  of  present 
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
  • in connection with the SEC's investigation into Kendall Square Research Corp.`s
  • As grounds for their motion, plaintiffs state that: 1) on March 1, 1994, plaintiffs served
  • Plaintiffs' First Request For Production Of Documents Directed To Defendant Price Waterhouse
  • requesting, among other things, transcripts and related exhibits of present or former PW
  • employees who testified before the SEC in connection with the SEC's Investigation;
  • WHEREFORE plaintiffs request that this Court order all present and former PW
  • Relating to Investigations, 17 C.F.R. $ 203.6, and provide copies of the transcripts and
  • I, Stephen V. Saia, one of the attorneys for plaintiffs, hereby certify that plaintiffs have
  • On numerous occasions plaintiffs' counsel have communicated with counsel for PW on the issue
  • I, Stephen V. Saia, one of the attorneys for plaintiffs, hereby certify that on June 22,
  • New York, NY 10022
  • Larry Paskowitz Wolf Popper Ross Wolf & Jones
  • Garwin Bronzaft Gerstein & Fisher
  • Leonard Barrack Barrack Rodos & Bacine
  • Philadelphia, PA 19 103
  • Mel Lifshitz Berstein Liebhard & Lifshitz
  • Arthur Abbey Abbey & Ellis
  • Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll
  • Stephen Rabin Rabin & Garland

  • 19 . PLF MEM REG PROD DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    TRANSCRIPTS
    RELATED EXHIBITS
    EMPLOYEES
    DEFENDANTS
    PRODUCTION
    CONNECTION
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    REQUEST
    AUDIT
    FORMER EMPLOYEES
    MOTION
    COURT
    FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
    ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
    COMPEL
    TESTIMONY
    DISCLOSURE
    COMMISSION
    CLASS PERIOD
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    SECURITIES FRAUD ACTION
    KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH
    POSSESSION
    LITIGATION
    REVENUE RECOGNITION PRACTICES
    INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS1
    COMMON STOCK
    PRICE WATERHOUSE
    MATERIALS
    
    -..
     r
    %,                                                                                                 
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    ,,>
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    +lll
                                                 UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT               COURT          
                                             FOR  THE  DISTRICT           OF  MASSACHUSETTS
           >,
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    ,
                                                                                                       
          -1,
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
             IN  RE:  KENDALL              SQUARE  RESEARCH  CORP.                                 
             SECURITIES  LITIGATION                                                                  
    +
    
    
    
                                       PLAINTIFFS'        MEMORGNDUM              IN  SUPPORT  OF  ITS
                            MOTION       TO  COMPEL  PRODUCTION                  OF  DOCUMENTS         
                                          TO  DEFENDANT              PRICE  WATERHOUSE?           
    
                      Pursuant  to  Fed.R.Civ.P.  37, plaintiffs  hereby  submit  this  memorandum  in 
    
            their  motion  to  compel  production  of  documents,  including  transcripts  and related 
    
            all present  and  former  employees  of  Price  Waterhouse,  L.L.P.  (,`PW")  who 
    
            Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (`SEC")  in  connection  with  the  SEC's 
    
            Kendall  Square  Research  Corp.`s  ("KSR")  accounting  practices  for  fiscal  years 
    
            (the  "SEC's  Investigation").
    
                                    I.  INTRODUCTION                AND  PROCEDURAL         BACKGROUND
    
                           This  is a securities  fraud  action  in  which  plaintiffs  allege,  among 
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • all present and former employees of Price Waterhouse, L.L.P. who testified before the
  • Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the SEC's investigation into
  • Kendall Square Research Corp.`s accounting practices for fiscal years 1992 and 1993
  • This is a securities fraud action in which plaintiffs allege, among other things, that PW a
  • public accounting firm violated the federal securities laws by making a series of false and
  • misleading statements that artificially inflated the value of RSR's common stock.
  • defendant PW served as KSR's independent public accountants1 The
  • connection with its audit of KSR's financial statements for fiscal year 1992 ending December
  • ' In denying PW's motion to dismiss on November 9, 1994, this Court allowed plaintiffs'
  • KSR and certain of its present and former directors, officers and employees for possible
  • violations of the federal securities laws in connection with KSR's accounting practices.
  • testimony of these PW employees and partners and the exhibits associated with their testimony
  • production of these transcripts and related exhibits that are clearly relevant to this
  • Documents Directed To Defendant Price Waterhouse,
  • The Request seeks, among other things, documents concerning: 1) PW's audit of KSR's financial
  • Consistent with their automatic disclosure obligations and/or in response to plaintiffs'
  • materials in connection with its investigation, or transcripts and related exhibits of PW
  • their possession from these depositions.
  • within PW's possession, custody or control, forcing plaintiffs to file a motion to compel.
  • defendants to produce documents in possession of current and past employees.

  • 20 . PW RESP TP ORD DIST FUNDS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BOSTON
    BERSHAD
    THOMAS
    WECHSLER
    MATTER
    ENCLOSURE
    COURT
    DISTRICT
    CIVIL
    CASEY
    PETER
    WASHINGTON
    EDMUND
    DAVID
    YORK
    DOUGHERTY
    STUART
    SQUARE
    POPEO
    SETTLEMENT
    MOTION
    RESPONSE
    PRICE WATERHOUSE
    ROBERT
    GLEN DEVALERIO
    RUDMAN
    JEFFREY
    SHAPIRO
    VER
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                          :
        ,? q
    IN  RE:          KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH                            :                   CIVIL    
    
    CORP.  SECURITIES                  LITIGATlON                         . .                 93-12352-H
                                                                          :
                                                                          l .
    
    
    
                            PRICE  WATERHOUSE  LLP'S  RESPONSE  TO  MOTION
                   FOR  ORDER  AUTHORIZING                   DISBURSEMENT  OF  SETTLEMENT  FUND
    
               Pursuant           to  this      Court's         Order  dated  May  4,  1995,  Price
    
    Waterhouse            LLP  ("Price            Waterhouse")                     hereby        
    
    plaintiffs'             Motion        for  an  Order  Authorizing                             
    
    Settlement            Fund  ("Motion             for  Disbursement8'),                             
    
    served          on  Price       Waterhouse              following                the  Court's      
    
    1995.
    
               Price      Waterhouse            takes  no  position                      with          
    
    plaintiffs           '  Motion        for  Disbursement.                          In  doing        
    
    
    Waterhouse            does  not  acknowledge                    agreement                  with    
    
    positions            or  factual           assertions           set  forth                  in  the
    
    Disbursement,                 and  the  accompanying                          memorandum  and 
    
    submitted            in  support           thereof,         and  fully               reserves      
    
    challenge            any  such  legal            positions                    or  factual          
    
    as  they  may  relate                 to  further           litigation                    of  this 
    
    Price          Waterhouse          or  to  any  litigation                        arising          
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP'S RESPONSE TO MOTION
  • of Settlement.
  • Glovsky & Popeo One Liberty
  • One Financial Center Boston,
  • Stuart
  • Wechsler,
  • Esq.
  • Thomas J. Dougherty,
  • One Beacon Street New York,
  • Edmund C.
  • Weiss, Bershad,
  • IN WASHINGTON.
  • PETER M. CASEY
  • States District Court for the District
  • Square Research
  • Civil Action No. 93-12352-H
  • to this matter.
  • Ver
  • Thomas G. Shapiro,
  • Jeffrey
  • Rudman, Esq.
  • Glen DeValerio,
  • Robert
  • David J. Bershad,

  • 22 . PLF MTN FR CLASS CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BADER
    MORRIS
    WOLF
    ENCLOSURES
    TGS
    PETER
    HAND DELIVERY
    HENRY ELLIS
    ANNE ROSENBLUM
    BLAUNER
    MICHELLE
    URMY
    HABER THOMAS
    SHAPIRO EDWARD
    JOHNSON
    DENNIS
    SQUIRE
    GREENFIELD
    HARVEY
    MONTAGUE
    BERGER
    GROSS
    BERNARD
    GARLAND
    RABIN
    FISHER
    BACINE
    RODOS
    BARRACK
    
                                                                                                       
    
    
      -.
                                    IN  THE  UNITED                  STATES  DISTRICT                  
                                       FOR  THE  DISTRICT                      OF  MASSACHUSETT$       
                                                                                                       
      :; i
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
      8~.
    
    
    
    IN  RE:          KENDALL  SQUARE  RESEARCH  CORP.                                           :      
                     SECURITIES              LITIGATION                                                
    
    
    
    
                              PLAINTIFFS'               MOTION  FOR  CLASS  CERTIFICATION
    
    
                 Pursuant         to  Rule            23  of  the  Federal                   Rules     
    
    plaintiffs                move  for          an  Order          certifying               a  Class  
    
    follows:
    
    
    
                        All       persons             or  entities               who  purchased        
                         common  stock                 of  Kendall               Square         
                         Corporation                  during        the  period              beginning 
                        March          25,  1993  through                      December              
                         inclusive               and  who  sustained                      a  loss.
                        Excluded             from        the  Class              are  the  defendants,
                        members          of  the              immediate            families            
                        the       individual                  defendants            named  in  the
                        Consolidated                   Amended             Complaint,                
                        or  directors                  and/or        partners               of  each
                        defendant                entity.             -
    
    
              Plaintiffs'               motion           is  based            on  the  accompanying    
    
    of  Law  and  all              other          pleadings                on  f  ile       in  this   
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • WOLF & JONES
  • BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
  • & FISHER
  • RABIN & GARLAND
  • LAW OFFICES OF BERNARD M.
  • GROSS
  • BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C.
  • LAW OFFICES OF HARVEY
  • GREENFIELD
  • -3-& SQUIRE
  • LAW OFFICES OF DENNIS 5.
  • JOHNSON
  • MORRIS AND MORRIS
  • BADER & BADER
  • -4-Thomas G. Shapi