LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

LAWRENCE L LASHWAY v KENDALL SQUARE RESEARCH CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LLLVKSRC247385, CourtName: MA DC, Plaintiff: LAWRENCE L LASHWAY, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>LLLVKSRC247385, State: MA Massachusetts, Kendall Square, Audit Committee, Stock, Computer Systems, Class Period, Common, Securities, Facts, Exchange Act, Management, Directors, Class Action, Financial Statements, Rule Lob-5, Material Facts, Misrepresentations, Earnings Estimates, Commercial Customers, Highly Complex Computer, Fast Growing Manufacturer, Class Action Complaint, Misleading, Dissemination, Defendant Burkhardt, Shareholders, Apb Nos, Gaap, Residence, Demand, Government, Parties, Ill, County, Par, Tram, Judge, Nature , ContentID: 120253998

Case Documents
1 1995-10-12 DF RSP TO PLF NTC PDN DOC
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130755
2 pages
PDF
2 1993-11-12 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130754
30 pages
PDF
3 1993-11-12 CIVIL COVER SHEET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130753
5 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 37 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DF RSP TO PLF NTC PDN DOC

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
No key words
found in document.
--------------
This indicates that
document is an image.
--------------
Images in PDF files
often contain text
readable by persons
but not by scanners.
                                      UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                                        DISTRICT             OF  MASSACHUSETTS


 GERTRUDE  GOROD,
                                       Plaintiff,
 V.                                                                                      CIVIL     
                                                                               i         NO. 
 DEPARTMENT  OF  EMPLOYMENT  AND
 TRAINING,         NILS  NORDBERG,                                             i
 Commissioner,              ANNA  M.  MCKEON,                                  )
 JOHN  MARRA,  DOREEN  GATELY,                                                 )
                                       Defendants.                             >

                            DEFENDANTS'  RESPONSE  TO  PLAINTIFF'S
                              NOTICE  OF  PRODUCTION  OF  DOCUMENTS

          Defendants         Respond  to  Plaintiff's                          "Notice           of

 Documents'*        dated  September                    11,  1995,  as  follows:

 RESPONSE:

          Defendants         have  no  objections                    to  Requests               

 10  and  10A  and  will                make  such  documents                        available     

 for  inspection             and  photocqpying                     at  the  office               of

General,         200  Portland              Street           3rd  Floor,             Boston,       

mutually         convenient             time,         to     be  arranged             between      

defendants'              counsel,         Assistant             Attorney             General       

 (617)  727-2200             x  3329.

          Defendants         object         to  producing              the  documents              

requests         #4,  5,  6,  7  on  the  grounds                       that          defendants   

produced         such  documents                  in  defendants'                possession        

7,  1994  pursuant              to  Local             Rule  26.2,            and  plaintiff        

many  of  the  requested                   documents               in  May  of  1995  pursuant     

Local        Rule  26.2.         Notwithstanding                     such  objection,              

SNIPPETS:

2 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
AUDIT COMMITTEE
STOCK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS
CLASS PERIOD
COMMON
SECURITIES
FACTS
EXCHANGE ACT
MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS
CLASS ACTION
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
RULE LOB-5
MATERIAL FACTS
MISREPRESENTATIONS
EARNINGS ESTIMATES
COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS
HIGHLY COMPLEX COMPUTER
FAST GROWING MANUFACTURER
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
MISLEADING
DISSEMINATION
DEFENDANT BURKHARDT
SHAREHOLDERS
APB NOS
GAAP
                                      UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                               FOR  THE  DISTRICT  OF  MASSACHUSETTS

                                                                                                   
_______--f-_______--__I_________________--------------------------                    X            
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
LAWRENCE               L.  LASHWAY,               on  behalf  of              :                    
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
li
    himself  and  all  others  similarly  situated,                           :  Civil  Action  No.
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
                                                     Plaintiff,               :                    
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   

                                                                              . .                  
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
                     -against-                                                                    
                                                                              .                    
KENDALL            SQUARE  RESEARCH                       CORP.,              ;
    HENRY  BURKHARDT                        III,  WILLIAM              I.     :             JURY
                                                                                            ,      
    KOCH,  RICHARD                   A.  BIRD,  WILLIAM                       :
    H.  CONGLETON,                  LARRY  E.  REEDER,                        :
    and PRICE  WATERHOUSE,                                                    .                   9
                                                                              .
                                                     Defendants.              :
_-------_-___-----__________r___________--------------------------
                                                                                      X

                     Plaintiff,  individually  and  on behalf  of  all  other  persons  similarly

situated,  for  his  Class  Action  Complaint  alleges:

                                                 NATURE  OF  THE  CASE

                      1.  This  is  a Class  Action  brought  on behalf  of  Lawrence  L.  Lashway

and  all  other  persons  or  entities,  except  for  Defendants  or  their  privies,  who 

Kendall  Square  Research  Corporation  ("Kendall  Square"  or  the  "Company")  common
SNIPPETS:
  • for his Class Action Complaint alleges:
  • This is a Class Action brought on behalf of Lawrence L. Lashway
  • Kendall Square Research Corporation common
  • Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule lob-5.
  • Square and its management, aided and abetted by its outside auditors and th
  • fast growing manufacturer of highly complex computer systems.
  • profits and then sold 50,000 shares of stock at inflated prices.
  • announcements during the Class Period caused its stock to rise to a high of $25.75 per
  • The Management Defendants
  • directors, and a member of the executive committee of its board of directors.
  • Shareholders contained in Kendall Square's 1992 Annual Report.
  • members of the Class who have conspired and committed acts as charged herein.
  • acts and practices, misleading statements, and omissions particularized herein would
  • upon Plaintiff and the other members of the Class.
  • The Audit Committee Defendants
  • facts about the business and finances of Kendall Square;
  • Defendants made public misrepresentations or omitted material
  • Defendant Burkhardt told the Dow Jones Newswire that Kendall
  • the published earnings estimates over the wire on August 12,
  • requirements of commercial customers are stability and reliability.
  • recognized under GAAP or under Kendall Square's stated revenue recognition
  • As auditor of Kendall Square's financial statements for the 1992
  • allowing or permitting the dissemination during the
  • Concepts No. 2 and (APB Nos.
  • and made various untrue statements of material facts and omitted to stated

  • 3 . CIVIL COVER SHEET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEMAND
    COURT
    GOVERNMENT
    PARTIES
    ILL
    PLAINTIFF
    COUNTY
    PAR
    TRAM
    JUDGE
    NATURE
    FOREIGN
    PTF DEF
    ATTORNEYS
    DEFENDANT
    LOCAL RULE
    WORCM
    CHUSERE
    D-CT
    PURSUANT
    BYADISLWCT
    L20
    RJGUDLES
    CIVIL COYER SBEET
    IHE
    IJNLFEO STATES DISTRFCT
    RNEY
    VIII
    JURY DEMAND
    
    JS44
    (Rev.  07189)
    
    
    
    sheet.  WE             INSTRUCTIONS                 ON  THE  REVERSE              OF  THE  FORM.)
    
     I  (a)  PLAlNllFFS
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                COUNT,'            OF  RESIDENCE                 OF  +IRST  LISTED     
     (b)  COUNTY  OF  RESIDENCE                                    OF  FIRST  LISTED                 
                                                                             (IN  U.S.  PLAINTIFF      
                                                   (EXCEPT         IN  U.S.  PLAINTIFF                
                                NCiTF,
    
                                ..-._.  IN  LAND
    
                                            ..~ ~              CONDEMNATION                           
          OF  THE
    
                                            TRACT-OF              IAN0           INVOLVED
    
    
      (c)         ATTORNEYS                   (FIRM     NAME,       ADORES%            AND      
                                ATTORNEYS                (IF  KNOWN)
    
    sieved                              L-         i%L&b                  (  235                       
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                          I
      II.  BASIS  OF  JURISDICTION                                                                    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    lllZENSHlP                                                   OF  PRINCIPAL                         
         (FLACEANW
    
    
                             w4oNElmX
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DEFENDANT COUNTY OF RESIDENCE
  • (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF
  • ATTORNEYS
  • FOR PL*JNT,FF *ND WE BDX MR DEFENDANT!
  • I U.S. Government
  • PTF DEF
  • PartIes 10 Item Ill)
  • Foreign Nation
  • 7 Judge tram
  • 2 Removed tram
  • JURY DEMAND:
  • RNEY OF RECORD
  • IJNlfEO STATES DISTRfCT COURT
  • ON IHE
  • CIVIL COYER SBEET.
  • RJGUDLES
  • OF NATURE
  • l20.
  • BYADISlWCT
  • PURSUANT
  • SECTION OF m D-CT
  • ~CHUSErE
  • WORCm
  • (SEE LOCAL RULE M.l(fJ)
  • DO AI.& OraER PAR=
  •    |