LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CAROL S MORTON v KURZWEIL APPLIED INTELLIGENCE INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CSMVKAII256956, CourtName: MA DC, Plaintiff: CAROL S MORTON, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CSMVKAII256956, Coopers, Settlement, Kurzweil, Federal Court, Market, Stipulation, Securities, Motion, Stock, Ipo, Class Period, Price, Securities Fraud, Common Stock, Class Plaintiffs, Financial Statements, Offering, Dismiss, Audit, Complaint, Certification, Securities Act, Paragraph, Class Action, Pursuant, Fraud, Damages, Supp, Standards, Bar Order, Depositions, Class Members, Compl, Class Certification, Revenue, Transactions, Settlement Fund, Public Offering, Exhibit, Cac, Averments, Purchasers, Truth , ContentID: 120253987

Case Documents
1 1998-02-04 ORDER & FINAL JUDGEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130690
8 pages
PDF
2 1998-02-02 ORD CERTIFYING CLASS ACTN
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130689
6 pages
PDF
3 1998-02-02 DF ASNTD MTN STLMNT BR OR
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130685
4 pages
PDF
4 1998-01-30 PLF MEM SUP PRPSD STLMNT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130696
54 pages
PDF
5 1997-11-24 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130707
26 pages
PDF
6 1997-04-04 C&L MTN IN SUP OF DEPS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130674
3 pages
PDF
7 1997-04-04 C&L MEM FOR DEPOSITIONS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130672
10 pages
PDF
8 1997-03-28 C&L OPP TO COMPEL WITNSES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130675
14 pages
PDF
9 1996-11-20 C&L RESP TO PLF CERT MEM
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130678
10 pages
PDF
10 1996-11-07 PLF SUP MEM MTN CLS CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130701
9 pages
PDF
11 1996-09-13 DEF RPLY TO PLF MTN CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130684
11 pages
PDF
12 1996-08-09 PLF RPLY MEM ON CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130700
22 pages
PDF
13 1996-06-04 C&L OPP TO PLF MTN CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130676
24 pages
PDF
15 1995-11-20 PLF MTN FR ENTRY ORD DIST
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130699
7 pages
PDF
16 1995-11-17 PLF MEM N SUP OF CLS CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130693
21 pages
PDF
17 1995-10-13 PLF MTN FR CLS CERT & DIS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130698
8 pages
PDF
18 1995-07-05 RQST FR INT ASS REG EVDNC
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130704
31 pages
PDF
19 1995-07-05 CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130681
67 pages
PDF
20 1995-07-05 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT & CLAIM
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130671
15 pages
PDF
22 1995-06-09 C&L OPP TO PLF MTN
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130677
7 pages
PDF
23 1995-05-31 PLF MEM OPP DEF MTD COMP
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130694
37 pages
PDF
24 1995-05-26 PLF MEM C&L OBJ BAR ORDR
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130691
18 pages
PDF
25 1995-05-03 SETTLEMENT BAR ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130705
3 pages
PDF
27 1995-04-21 PLF MEM SUP CLS ACN STMNT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130695
30 pages
PDF
34 1995-04-06 AFDVT BREW
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130669
7 pages
PDF
35 1995-02-15 CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130682
72 pages
PDF
37 1994-12-23 PLF MEM IN SUP CLAS CERT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130692
24 pages
PDF
38 1994-10-07 COMPLAINT TEACHERS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130680
27 pages
PDF
39 1994-04-29 COMPLAINT MORTON
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130679
13 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 39 documents , 683 pages
Price: $ 199.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ORDER & FINAL JUDGEMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
No key words
found in document.
--------------
This indicates that
document is an image.
--------------
Images in PDF files
often contain text
readable by persons
but not by scanners.
                                            UNITED           STATES  DISTRICT                      
                                      FOR  THE  DISTRICT                     OF  MASSACHUSETTS



CAROL  S.  MORTON,  et  al.,                                                       ) )
                                                Plaintiffs,                        )         C.  A.
                                                                                   )               
.:'. Al*- ,~ ,\,,;
                      -against-                                                                    
                                                                                   i
KURZWEIL            APPLIED                INTELLIGENCE,                                           
INC.,       et  al.,                                                                i
                                                Defendants.                         )


                                                 ORDER  AND  FINAL                         JUDGMENT

                      The  above-entitled                             action               (the    

previously                  certified             by'  this           Court         for            
a

class           action          on  behalf                of  all        persons             who 

of  Kurzweil                  during         the  pe-riod                from      August          
l

28,       1994,            inclusive,              and  who  were                 damaged          


Excluded             from         the       Class           are  all        past            and 
  any

affiliates,                   officers             or  directors                  of  any  entity  
nd

any  members                  of  the           immediate             families                of 

defendants.                     The  sole                present         defendant                 


&  Lybrand                 L.L.P.          ("C&L").

                           Pursuant             to  a  Stipulation                         of 

 "Stipulation")                       dated        November              21,  1997,                
      on

SNIPPETS:

2 . ORD CERTIFYING CLASS ACTN

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
DEFENDANTS
SETTLEMENT
BADER
YORK
BOSTON
LLP
MASSACHUSETTS
SHAPIRO
OFFICERS
CIVIL PROCEDURE
MEMBERS
PLAINTIFFS
TIRTHER NOTICE
ADJOURN
COURT EXPRESSLY RESERVES
POST OFFICE SQUARE
ELIOT LLP
HOAG
FOLEY
HOTIAN
CHRISTIAN
WHITE PLAINS
WALTON BADER
PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA
LERACH LLP
WEISS BERSHAD HYNES
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
DUMAIN
      :                                               IGNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT-
5                                                  FOR  THE  DISTRICT  OF MASSACHUSETTS            

            CAROL  S. MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS                            )
            L.P.,  et  al.,  '
                                                        Plaintiffs,     i
                                     -against-                          >      C.A.  No. 
                                                                        >
            KURZWEIL               APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,               )
            INC.,  et  al.,                                             1
                                                        Defendants.  )
                                                                        1

                           ORDER  CERTIFYING  CLASS  ACTION  FOR  SETTLEMENT                       
                                                   AND  DIRECTING  NOTICE,  SETTLEMENT
                                                      HEARING  AND  DMI'NISTRATION


                      Upon  review  and consideration  of  the  Stipulation  of  Settlement  dated

            and the  exhibits  annexed  thereto  (the  "Stipulation"),  executed  on behalf  of 

            proposed  class members  and Coopers  &  Lybrand  L.L.P.  ("C&L"),  by their  duly 

            counsel,  and  as a hearing  on the  proposed  Settlement is necessary under  Rule  23 

            Rules  of  Civil  Procedure;

                      NOW,  upon  the application  of  all plaintiffs  in the  above-captioned 

            defendants,  it is hereby  ORDERED  as follows:

                      1.             This  consolidated  action  is hereby  certified  to  proceed 

            Rule  23 (a)  and 23(b)(3)  of  the Federal  Rules of  Civil  Procedure  for  the 

            Settlement  on behalf  of  a class consisting  of  "all  persons who  purchased  common

            Kurzweil  during  the  period  from  August  17, 1993  through  April  28,  1994, 

            were  damaged  thereby.  Excluded  from  the Class are all past and present 

            affiliates,  officers  or  directors  of  any entity  defendants,  and  any members  of

            of  the  individual  defendants."



                             .Qf
SNIPPETS:
  • and as a hearing on the proposed Settlement is necessary under Rule 23 of the Federal
  • upon the application of all plaintiffs in the above-captioned action and the settling
  • Rule 23 and 23of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the purposes of the proposed
  • Excluded from the Class are all past and present Defendants,
  • affiliates, officers or directors of any entity defendants, and any members of the immediate
  • such person files with the Court, in person or by mail upon: Thomas G. Shapiro, Esq., Shapiro
  • Haber & Urmy LLP, 75 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109; Sanford P. Dumain, Esq.,
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, New York
  • 10119; I. Walton Bader, Esq., Bader & Bader, 65 Court Street, White Plains, New York 10601;
  • Christian M. Hotian, Esq., Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP, One Post Office Square, Boston, MA
  • The Court expressly reserves the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing from
  • time to time without tirther notice, other than that which may be posted at the Court+!
  • Dated: Boston, Massachusetts

  • 3 . DF ASNTD MTN STLMNT BR OR

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BAR ORDER
    EXHIBIT
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    REFORM ACT
    STIPULATION
    DEFENDANT
    SECURITIES
    LITIGATION
    HERETO
    SETTLING DEFENDANTS
    ENTRY
    ESQ
    PRIVATE SECURITIES
    CLASS ACTION
    MOTION
    LYBRAND
    COOPERS
    BADER
    ATTORNEYS
    PURPOSES
    ENTERING
    CIR
    SUB NOM
    SUPP
    SECUNTRES
    FEDERAL COURT
    CONDITION PRECEDENT
    SUPPORT
    
    CAROL  S. MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,                              I  :: .
                                                            )      ,,i/-.
    ELLIOT  BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,                        >
    MARTIN  SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'                              >
    RETIREMENT  SYSTEM  OF LOUISIANA,                       1
    DARIN  J. LIEBER,  NEIL  F.  O'CONNELL,                 1
    THOMAS  J.  O'CONNELL,  and                             )
    KENNETH  R.  FIRST,  M.D.,                              >
                                                            1
                            Plaintiffs,                     >       C.A.  No.  94-10829~REK
                                                            1
                   V.                                       >
                                                            >
    KURZWEIL  APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                        1
    INC.,  RAYMOND  C. KURZWEIL,                            )
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,  ROBERTSON                     )
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,                            >
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.  and                         )
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,                           >
                                                            >
                            Defendants.                     >
    
    
                                     COOPERS  &  LYBRAND          L.L.P.`S
                   ASSENTED  TO  MOTION            FOR  S ET  TL&MENT          B AR  ORJIER
    
    
            Settling  Defendant  Coopers &  Lybrand  L.L.P.  ("C&L"),  the sole remaining  defendant
    
    in  this action,  moves for  entry of  a Settlement Bar Order in  the form  of the proposed order
    
    attached hereto as Exhibit  1 in  connection with  the hearing on Final  Approval  of Settlement to
    
    be held on February  4,  1998  In  support of this motion,  C&L  states as follows:
    
           On November  21,  1997 C&L  and plaintiffs  entered into  a Stipulation  of Settlement of
    
    this class action  (the "Stipulation").  The Stipulation  provides,  as a condition  precedent to
    
    settlement,  that "a Settlement Bar Order in the form  attached [thereto]  as Exhibit  C  me]
    
    
                                                                                                r
    
    entered by  the Federal Court."  Stipulation  at 9 and Exhibit  C to Stipulation.  The proposed
    
    order attached hereto at Exhibit  1 is a copy of Exhibit  C to the Stipulation.
    
            Federal courts enter settlement bar orders to encourage settlements and to provide
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Settling Defendant Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.,
  • moves for entry of a Settlement Bar Order in the form of the proposed order
  • attached hereto as Exhibit 1 in connection with the hearing on Final Approval of Settlement to
  • The Stipulation provides,
  • entered by the Federal Court."
  • order attached hereto at Exhibit 1 is a copy of Exhibit C to the Stipulation.
  • Power Supply Secuntres J,l&, 720 F. Supp.
  • Plaintiffs v. Scat&, 955 F.2d 1268 (9" Cir.), cert.
  • den&d sub nom J&&fer v. Ciw
  • As one court has noted,
  • resources which might be consumed by increasingly expensive litigation can be put to other
  • salutory purposes, courts in this district routinely enter settlement bar orders in connection
  • with the settlement of securities class action litigation.
  • it, if any, on basis of settling defendants' comparative fault).
  • The settlement bar order that C&L seeks through this motion is
  • In addition, although not technically applicable to this case, the Private Securities
  • Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides support for entering the proposed
  • the Reform Act provides that upon "entry of the settlement by the
  • of a bar order substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit 1 is a condition precedent
  • I, Peter M. Casey, one of the attorneys for Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., certify that on
  • I, Peter M. Casey, one of the attorneys for Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., certify that on this

  • 4 . PLF MEM SUP PRPSD STLMNT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DAMAGES
    LITIGATION
    INDEMNIFICATION
    MORTON
    CAROL
    KATZ
    YOUNQ
    STEIN
    NEWMAN
    
                                      UNITED             STATES  DISTRICT                       COURT
                                  FOR  THE  DISTRICT                          OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS                                   )
    L.P.,     et  al.,
    
                                             Plaintiffs,)                       Civ.     Action        
    
                    V.                                                  1
    
    
    
    KURZWEIL  APPLIED               INTELLIGENCE,
    INC.,     et  al.,                                                                                 
                                                                        ;                              
     "--
    
     X.
                                                                                                       
                                             Defendants.)                                              
     1'"1
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
       ,1,.
                                                                        1                              
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
      ,y,r
    
             --u
                                                                                                       
       "' F
    
       ;'::I
    
              iTt
                                CLASS  PLAINTIFFS'                            MEMORANDUM  OF  LAW      
                                                                                                       
        ,,,)
    
              a
    
        ,,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Newman v. Stein,
  • Younq v. Katz
  • CAROL S. MORTON, et al.,
  • indemnification.
  • the Litigation.
  • damages.
  • agreement.

  • 5 . STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FEDERAL COURT
    STIPULATION
    KURZWEIL
    CLASS PLAINTIFFS
    COUNSEL
    PURSUANT
    SETTLEMENT FUND
    LAW
    EXHIBIT
    GROSS SETTLEMENT FUND
    CLASS ESCROW AGENT
    CIVIL
    COMMON
    DEFENDANT
    CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
    PARAGRAPH
    MASSACHUSETTS
    DISTRICT COURT
    CLASS MEMBER
    APPROVALS
    CLASS PERIOD
    PARTIES HERETO
    DIRECTORS
    UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEYS
    CONNECTION
    NET SETTLEMENT FUND
    KURZWEIL APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
    FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
    
                                                 UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                                                    DISTRJCT  OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
          CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
          ELLIOT  BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,
          MARTlN  SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'
          RETIREMENT
          SYSTEM  OF  LOUISIANA,                   DARIN  J.
          LIEBER,  NEIL  F.  O'CONNELL,
          THOMAS  J.  O'CONNELL,                   and
          KENNETH  R.  FIRST,  M.D.,
    
                                         Plaintiffs,
    
                             V.                                                      CA.  No. 
                                                                                     Mass.)
          RURZWEIL         APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,
          INC.,  RAYMOND            C.  KURZWEIL,
          BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,                       ROBERTSON
          STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
          NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.  and
          COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                         Defendants.
    
                                                                               i
          KURZWEIL         APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                INC.          )
                                                                               >
                                     Plaintiff,                                1     Civil  Action
                                                                               )     No.  95-5720-E 
                  V.                                                           )     sup.  ct.)
                                                                               1
          COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.                                         1
                                                                               1
    
    
    
                  The  Class Plaintiffs,  Kurzweil  AI,  and  C&L,  as each are hereinafter  defined, 
    
          through  their  respective  counsel,  hereby  enter  into  the  following  Stipulation  of 
    
    
    
                                                                       -l-
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Class Plaintiffs, Kurzweil AI, and C&L, as each are hereinafter defined, by and
  • hereby enter into the following Stipulation of Settlement
  • pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth below and subject to court approval as set
  • the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts asserting claims under the
  • federal securities laws and the common law against Kurzweil AI, several of its officers, its
  • et al. v. Kurzweil Applied Intelligence, Inc., et al, Civil
  • Action No. 10&29-REK (the "Federal Court Action").
  • prosecuted on its behalf by counsel representing the Class Plaintiffs, at the expense of the
  • In connection with the investigation, they have conducted discovery, including
  • 60 "Claims Administrator" shall mean the person or entity designated by Class
  • (4 `Class Escrow Agent" shall mean the law firm of Shapiro,
  • Application For Attorneys' Fees substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A-l.
  • C&L shall deposit the Gross Settlement Fund in accordance with paragraph 2 hereof.
  • Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 94-10829XEK (D.
  • 60 "Net Settlement Fund" shall mean the Gross Settlement Fund less all counsel fees, taxes,
  • purchased Kurzweil AI common stock during the Settlement Class Period and sustained a loss
  • defendant, any entity in which any defendant has a controlling interest and any subsidiaries,
  • affiliates, officers, directors or partners of any entity defendant.
  • The parties hereto stipulate to the certification, for settlement purposes only, of the
  • Recognized Claim of any class member on equitable grounds.
  • All parties agree to use their best efforts to obtain all approvals necessary and to

  • 6 . C&L MTN IN SUP OF DEPS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MOTION
    KURZWEIL
    SUBPOENA
    DEFENDANT
    LYBRAND
    COOPERS
    ESQ
    MEMORANDUM
    REQUESTS
    DEVALERIO
    MASSACHUSETTS
    BOSTON
    SHAPIRO
    CERTIFY
    MATTER
    ATTORNEYS
    CASEY
    PETER
    ADEQUATE
    REASONS
    EMERGENCY
    KURZWEIL EMPLOYEES
    INTENDS
    CUSTOMERS
    SALESPEOPLE
    DEFENSE
    LIBERTY SQUARE
    PEASE
    BERMAN
    
                                          UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT         COURT
                                             DISTRICT     OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    
    
    CAROL  S. MORTON,  et al.,
    
    
                                   Plaintiffs,
    
                         V.                                               C.A.  No.  94-10829~RBK
                                                                          ORAL  ARGUMENT           
    KURZWEIL           APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,
    INC.,  RAYMOND              c.  KURZWEIL,
    BERNARD  F. BRADSTREET,                        ROBERTSON
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.  and
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                   Defendants.
                                                                 -
    
                           COOPERS  &  LYBRAND             L.L.P.`S  EMERGENCY         MOTION
                         [XIEAVE                                       OF  TEN  DEPOSITIONS
    
                 Defendant  Coopers  &  Lybrand  L.L.P.  ("C&L")  hereby  moves  pursuant  to  Fed.  R.
    
    30(a)(2)  for  leave  to  take  more  than  ten  depositions  in this  action.  In  connection 
    
    of  this  action,  C&L  has subpoenaed  for  deposition  ten  current  or  former  Kurzweil 
    
    C&L  has also  subpoenaed  for  deposition  nine  customers.  C&L  also has subpoenaed  (or  intends
    
    to  subpoena)  for  deposition  eight  other  Kurzweil  employees,  key  insiders  at Kurzweil 
    
    for  communicating  with  C&L.  Plaintiffs  have  informed  C&L  that  they intend  to  object  to 
    
    taking  more  than  ten  depositions.
    
                 C&L  Iiles this  motion  on  an emergency  basis because the  deadline  for 
    
    discovery  in  this  case is May  30,  1997.  The  depositions  of  the  salespeople  and 
    
    
    285012.1
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Defendant Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. hereby moves pursuant to Fed.
  • 30for leave to take more than ten depositions in this action.
  • C&L has subpoenaed for deposition ten current or former Kurzweil salespeople.
  • C&L has also subpoenaed for deposition nine customers.
  • C&L also has subpoenaed (or intends
  • to subpoena) for deposition eight other Kurzweil employees,
  • depositions of the additional eight Kurzweil employees in April and May. Accordingly,
  • requests a prompt ruling on this motion.
  • reasons stated in its Memorandum in Support of its Emergency Motion for Leave to Take More
  • the reasons such depositions are needed for C&L to prepare an adequate defense.
  • C&L requests that the Court grant C&L leave to take more than ten
  • I, Peter M. Casey, one of the attorneys for defendant Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. in the
  • above-captioned matter, certify that on this 4'h day of April, 1997, I caused a true copy of
  • foregoing to be served by hand on Thomas G. Shapiro, Esq., Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, 75
  • State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 and Glen DeValerio, Esq., Berman, DeValerio &
  • Pease, One Liberty Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 and by fust class mail, postage

  • 7 . C&L MEM FOR DEPOSITIONS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COMPLAINT
    KURZWEIL
    TRANSACTIONS
    DEFENDANTS
    TESTIMONY
    DISCOVERY
    COMMUNICATING
    CUSTOMERS
    SETTLING DEFENDANTS
    PARTIES
    REASONS
    SALESPEOPLE
    COURT
    AUDIT
    ACCORDING
    ALLEGES
    SCHEDULING ORDER
    SUBPOENA
    SETTLEMENT
    MOTION
    ADMISSIBILITY
    STIPULATE
    WITNESSES
    JUDGEMENT
    NATURE
    SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
    SALES
    COMPARATIVE FAULT
    
                                             UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT            COURT
                                               DISTRICT     OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    
      CAROL  S. MORTON,  et al.,                                                                       
    
    
    
                                     Plaintiffs,
    
                          V.                                                    C.A.  No.  94-10829~REK
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
     KURZWEIL           APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                                                         
     INC.,  RAYMOND               c.  IaJRzwEIL,
     BERNARD  F. BRADSTREET,                         ROBERTSON
      STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
     NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.  and
     COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                   Defendants.
    
    
                 COOPERS  &  LYBRAND                   L.L.P.`S  MEMORANDUM           IN  SUPPORT  OF 
      EMERGENCY                  MOTION      FOR  LEAVE  TO  TAKE  IN  EXCESS  OF  TEN  DEPOSITIONS
    
                 Defendant  Coopers  &  Lybrand  L.L.P.  (Y&L")           submits  this memorandum  in 
    
     its Emergency  Motion  for  Leave  to  Take  in  Excess of  Ten  Depositions.
    
                                                PRELIMINARY        STATEMENT
    
                 This  action  is a complex  securities  fi-aud  class action.  By  their  Complaint, 
    
    charged  Kurzweil  Applied  Intelligence,  Inc.  ("Kurzweil"),  C&L,  and  other  defendants  with
    
    violations  of  6  11 of  the  Securities  Act  of  1933,  15 USC.  $77k,  and  8  10(b)  of  the 
    
    Exchange  Act  of  1934,  15 U. S.C.  $78j.  &e  Consolidated  Amended  Class Action  Complaint
    
    ("Complaint")        at 77  124-160.  In  May  1995, Kurzweil  and  all  of  the  defendants 
    
    (collectively  the  "Settling  Defendants")  settled  with  Plaintiffs.  C&L  continues  to  defend
    
    
    285072.1
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • By their Complaint, plaintiffs
  • charged Kurzweil Applied Intelligence, Inc., C&L, and other defendants with
  • &e Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
  • Kurzweil salespeople.
  • C&L has also subpoenaed for deposition nine customers.
  • subpoenaed or intends to subpoena for deposition eight other Kurzweil employees,
  • Kurzweil responsible for communicating with C&L.
  • intend to object to C&L taking more than ten depositions under local rule 26.1.
  • C&L should be granted leave to take the depositions it seeks for the following reasons:
  • Plaintiffs have speciftcally identifted in the Complaint 45 transactions
  • The Complaint alleges that the FY 1993 fmancial statements for Kurzweil,
  • improperly capitalized software development costs, The Complaint lists 45 transactions with 43
  • customers which, according to the Complaint, were improperly booked as revenue as a result of
  • C&L's alleged "reckless" failure to perform sufficient tests during its audit for FY 1993.
  • The depositions C&L now seeks fiom the salespeople,
  • Furthermore, despite the settlement, the extent and nature of the Settling Defendants' own
  • The settlement bar order that this Court
  • proceedings against C&L with respect to the Claims: the judgment shall be set-off
  • the Settling Defendants comparative fault remains an important issue in this
  • Through the testimony these witnesses are expected to provide,
  • H. The Parties Contemplated More Than Ten Depositions Would Be Needed
  • 1995 this court entered a scheduling order in this case.
  • Plaintiffs Have Declined to Stipulate to the Criminal Trial Record
  • discovery could be made more efficient if the parties stipulate to admissibility of the
  • criminal trial, which resulted in the convictions of co-CEO Bradstreet and VP of Sales
  • By submitting this Motion, C&L does not acknowledge that the discovery herein

  • 8 . C&L OPP TO COMPEL WITNSES

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MANAGING AGENTS
    CIV
    CAAMITICF
    FORTHEUSE OFDEPOSITION OFA
    OWS FORTHEUSE OFDEPOSITION
    PROPER NOTICE
    DEPOSITIONAFTERTHE CORPORATIONIS
    OFONE OFITS MANAGING
    FAILURE ONTHE
    FUTILE
    MORTON
    CAROL
    
                                                  UNITED         STATES  DISTRICT                      
                                                    DISTRICT           OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
                  ,-'-
    
    
    
    CAROL  S.  MORTON,  et  al.,
    
    
                                         Plaintiffs,
    
                             V.                                                                        
                                                                                          ;
    KURZWEIL               APPLIED           INTELLIGENCE,
    INC.,         et  al.                                                                 ,'
    
                                         Defendants.
    
    
                                        COOPERS  &  LYBRAND  L.L.P.'S                                  
                                         TO  PLAINTIFFS'                  MOTION  TO  COMPEL  THE
                                      PRODUCTION               OF  WITNESSES  FOR  DEPOSITION
    
                 Coopers              &  Lybrand          L.L.P.              ("C&L')            
    on
    
    to  Compel               the        Production               of  Witnesses                      for
    
                 Plaintiffs                seek  to  compel                    C&L  to  produce        
          two
    
    former          C&L  employees,                      Jos  van  Shaik                         and 
    
    
    that         they        are  "managing                  agents"           of  C&L  under          
    
    37(d)          and  32(2).                    However,           only         current              
    
    entity               or  those         under         its      control            may  be  subject  
    
    deposition                      as  "managing            agents."               Neither            
    
    work         for        or  are  under               the      control            of  C&L.          
      they
    
    are  not  "managing                       agents."               Under          these            
    r
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAROL S. MORTON, et al.,
  • futile.
  • P. 37allows for a corporatepartyto be sanctioned for a failure onthe part ofone ofits
  • R. Civ.
  • P. 32all ows fortheuse ofdeposition ofa corporation's managing agent against that corporation

  • 9 . C&L RESP TO PLF CERT MEM

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    SUPP
    PURCHASERS
    CERTIFICATION
    SECURITIES
    OFFERING
    GUSTAFSON
    COOPERS
    CONTRAST
    SEAQATE
    AFTER-MARKET
    SUBMISSION
    MOTION
    MEMORANDUM
    RESPONSE
    LYBRAND
    ESQUIRE
    BBO
    JUDGE
    ICN
    CONFLICT
    OPINION
    STATUTE
    SQUARE
    STANDING
    DEFENDANT
    KURZWEIL
    BADER
    BOSTON
    
                                                                                                       
                  STATES  DISTRICT                                                 COURT
                                                                                                       
                                          OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    l            .             .              .              .              .               ...*       
                  .                .        .       .
    
    
    
    
    CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
    ELLIOT                                                  BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,
                                                           .
    MARTIN                                                  SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'
                                                           .
    RETIREMENT                                                                            SYSTEM  OF 
                                                           .
    DARIN  J.  LIEBER,                                                                                 
                                                           l
    O'CONNELL,                                                                            THOMAS  J. 
                                                           .
    and  KENNETH  R.  FIRST,                                                                           
                                                           .
    
    
    
                                                           .
                                                                                                       
                                                           .
    
    
    
                                                           l
                                              V.
                                                                                C.A.      NO. 
    
                                                           .
    
                                                           .
    KURZWEIL                                                               APPLIED                     
                                                           .
    INC.,                                     RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL,
                                                           l
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,                                                                           
    BERTSON                                                .
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
                                                           .
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • RAYMOND C. KURZWEIL,
  • DEFENDANT COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.'S
  • RESPONSE
  • TO PLAINTIFFS'
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN
  • SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
  • Submission,
  • AFTER-MARKET
  • PURCHASERS HAVE NO SECTION
  • have no $ 11 standing.
  • 929 F. Supp.
  • Court held that § 12,
  • Gustafson
  • -2-sale of securities
  • of the opinion,
  • of a new offering."
  • on the text of the statute.
  • of the conflict
  • cite In re ICN Pharmaceuticals,
  • Seaqate.
  • also cite Judge Saris/s recent order in Van de
  • BBO #236940
  • Esquire Shapiro,
  • Street Boston,
  • Square Boston,
  • Bader, Esquire Bader

  • 10 . PLF SUP MEM MTN CLS CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BADER
    YOURMAN
    WEISS
    BRODY
    GATEWAY
    SKELTON
    THOMAS
    LOWEY DANNENBERG BEMPORAD
    PEASE LLP
    DEVALERIO
    BERMAN
    CERTIFICATION
    MORTON
    CAROL
    
                                          UNITED            STATES  DISTRICT                     COURT
                                                DISTRICT            OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    CAROL  S.  MORTON,  et  al.,
    
                                                 Plaintiffs,                     ;
    
                        V.                                                       i            C.A.  No.
    
    KURZWEIL  APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                                             ;                     
    INC.:        RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL;                                                                
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET;  ROBERTSON                                                                
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.;                                                                       
                                                                                 i                     
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.;                             and                                        
    
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,                                                ;                     
    
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
                                                  Defendants.                                          
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
        ?a
    
        I-
    
    
    
                                   PLAINTIFFS'                 SUPPLEMENTAL  MEMORANDUM
                                       IN  SUPPORT  OF  THEIR  MOTION  FOR
                                                      CLASS  CERTIFICATION
    
                        Pursuant          to  the  court's                      direction              
    
    conference            on  October              24,       1996,  plaintiffs                        
    
    this        Supplemental            Memorandum  in  Support                               of  their
    
    Certification.                  This  memorandum  provides                                  further
    
    position           that      plaintiffs                have  standing                   to  pursue 
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAROL S. MORTON, et al.,
  • certification.
  • BERMAN, DeVALERIO & PEASE LLP
  • BADER AND BADER
  • LOWEY DANNENBERG BEMPORAD
  • Thomas M. Skelton
  • The Gateway
  • STULL STULL & BRODY
  • WEISS & YOURMAN

  • 11 . DEF RPLY TO PLF MTN CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LERACH
    LYBRAND
    COOPERS
    STEPHENS
    ROBERTSON
    BRADSTREET
    BERNARD
    KENNETH
    THOMAS
    NEIL
    LIEBER
    DARIN
    LOUISIANA
    RETIREMENT SYSTEM
    TEACHERS
    MARTIN SEAMAN
    RAND1 ZINBERG
    ELLIOT BECKER
    CSM PARTNERS
    MORTON
    CAROL
    
    .
    
    
    
                                                                                                       
    rJ
                                                             UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT           
    yF
                                                               DISTRICT  OF  MASSACHUSETTS
              ' p "
           .  .  ...*                      .*       .*         .*             .  .  .  .  .  .
    
           CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
          ELLIOT  BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,
          MARTIN  SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'
          RETIREMENT  SYSTEM  OF  LOUISIANA,
          DARIN  J.  LIEBER,  NEIL  F.
          O'CONNELL,  THOMAS  J.  O'CONNELL,
          and  KENNETH  R.  FIRST,  M.D.,
    
                                                  Plaintiffs,
                                                                                                     .
                         V.                                                                          . 
                                                                                                     .
          KURZWEIL  APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                                                           .
          INC.,          RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL,
          BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,  ROBERTSON
          STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
          NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.,                                          and
          COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                                                  Defendants.
           .  .  .  .  .  .  .  ...*                                  .*         .*.         l
    
    
    
                                   DEFENDANT  COOPERS  &  LYBRAND  L.L.P.'S                            
                                   TO  PLAINTIFFS'                            MOTION  FOR  CLASS 
    
                      Defendant                   Coopers  &  Lybrand                             
    
          Surreply               to  Plaintiffs                       '  Motion             for  Class 
    
                                                                                         ARGUMENT
    
          I.          FRAUD-ON-THE-MARKET                                     IS  INAPPLICABLE         
                      INITIAL              PUBLIC  OFFERING
    
                      As  set  forth                       in  C&L's  Opposition                       
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • and KENNETH R. FIRST, M.D.,
  • BERNARD F. BRADSTREET, ROBERTSON STEPHENS & COMPANY, L.P.,
  • COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.,
  • Bader and Bader

  • 12 . PLF RPLY MEM ON CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STOCK
    IPO
    SECURITIES FRAUD
    PRICE
    COOPERS
    OFFERING
    PLAINTIFFS
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    COURT
    CLASS PERIOD
    CLASS ACTION
    SALE
    DAMAGES
    FINANCIALS
    SHARES
    CLASS MEMBERS
    CLASS CERTIFICATION
    CONFLICTS
    CLASS REPRESENTATIVES
    INFLATION
    KURZWEIL STOCK
    PURCHASERS
    DEFENDANT
    SECURITIES LAWS
    CLAIMANTS
    SUBCLASSES
    NASDAQ
    MARKET THEORY
    TRADING MARKET
    
                                              UNITED-  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                                                DISTRICT  OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    CAROL  S. MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
    ELLIOT  BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,
    MARTIN  SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'
    RETIREMENT                    SYSTEM  OF  LOUISIANA,
    DARIN  J. LIEBER,  NEIL  F.  O'CONNELL,
    THOMAS  J. O'CONNELL,  AND  KENNETH                                          CA.  No.  94-10829-s
    R. FIRST,  M.D.,
    
                                       Plaintiffs,
    
                           V.
    
    
    KURZWEIL              APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,
    INC.,  RAYMOND                  C. KURZWEIL,
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,  ROBERTSON
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,  NEEDHAM
    &  COMPANY,  INC.  AND  COOPERS  &
    LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                                       Defendants.
    
                                         PLAINTIFFS'     REPLY  MEMORANDUM                 ON
                                           MOTION  FOR  CLASS  CERTIFICATION
    
                   This  case presents  an archetypal  securities  fraud  wherein  a potentially 
    
    company  goes public  in  a NASDAQ  initial  public  offering  ((LIPO")  fueled  by  audited 
    
    statements that  show  strong  performance  in  terms  of  past sales and  earnings.  The  company's
    
    stock takes  off  on the  strength  of  market  information  fed  by the  IPO  documents  and  the 
    
    publicity  of  the  offering.  The  stock  doubles  the IPO  price  within  three  months.  Five 
    
    later  the truth  emerges.  The  original  fmancials  in  the IPO  severely  and  falsely 
    
    and  earnings.  The  financials  have  to be restated,  and  the  stock crashes.
    
                   The  securities  fraud  in  this  case is clear  and  publicly  known.  On  April 
    
    company,  Kurzweil  Applied  Intelligence,  Inc.  ("Kurzweil"),  its officer/director  defendants, 
    
    the  underwriters  in  the  IPO,  settled  the  securities  law  claims  in  this  case, and  on 
    
    federal  jury  convicted  certain  of  Kurzweil's  top  officers  of  criminal  securities
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • company goes public in a NASDAQ initial public offering fueled by audited financial
  • stock takes off on the strength of market information fed by the IPO documents and the initial
  • publicity of the offering.
  • The stock doubles the IPO price within three months.
  • The financials have to be restated,
  • The securities fraud in this case is clear and publicly known.
  • The only remaining defendant in the present case is Coopers & Lybrand,
  • The only issues before the Court on this Motion are whether to grant class action status to
  • adequacy or typicality of the class representatives.
  • There should be separate subclasses for Section 10and Section 11 claims,
  • Shareholders who sold stock during the class period should be
  • These arguments do not defeat class certification or the designation of the named
  • plaintiffs as suitable class representatives.
  • The Class, Class Period and Class Representatives in the April 1995 settlement, as approved
  • The IPO covered an offering of 2,100,OOO shares of Kurzweil common stock, which was
  • in Exhibit B, is that all purchasers of Kurzweil stock during the period from August 17, 1993
  • Defendant Coopers objects to plaintiffs' invoking the fraud on the market theory in the
  • The inflation in the price of Kurzweil stock stemming from the overstatement of sales and
  • context of an original IPO, i.e., in the circumstances of an initial public offering where no
  • The commonality of the reliance element, therefore, among class members in the
  • because in an initial public offering no trading market exists upon which investors may rely.
  • any claimant who purchased in the Kurzweil IPO has a complete claim for damages under Section
  • The mere fact that the offering documents contained material misrepresentations is enough
  • Since, under the allegations here, all claimants fall into that category, there really is no
  • irreconcilable conflicts between the two types of traders, and on the ground that the in/out
  • Coopers tries to make something of the fact that plaintiff Raudi Zinberg engaged in two

  • 13 . C&L OPP TO PLF MTN CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    KURZWEIL
    CERTIFICATION
    SECURITIES
    MOTION
    STOCK
    MARKET
    DEFENDANTS
    CLASS PERIOD
    FRAUD
    COOPERS
    ZINBERG
    TRADERS
    PRICE
    CERTIFY
    CONFLICT
    BRADSTREET
    RELIANCE
    OPPOSITION
    LYBRAND
    DISTRICT
    MISREPRESENTATION
    IPO
    SUBCLASSES
    STANDING
    OFFERING
    SEAQATE
    EXCHANGE
    BERNARD
    
                                                                                       UNITED          
                     COURT
                                                                                        DISTRICT       
                                                                   *     :;
    
                                                      : :..;:
    
                                                          :'" "  ZE  * ."
    
    CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
    ELLIOT                            BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,
    MARTIN                            SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'
    RETIREMENT                                                   SYSTEM  OF  LOUISIANA,
    DARIN  J.  LIEBER,                                                         NEIL             F.
    O'CONNELL,                                                   THOMAS  J.  O'CONNELL,
    and  KENNETH  R.  FIRST,                                                                    M.D.,
    
                                                                            Plaintiffs,
    
                               V.
              C.A.  NO.  94-10829-REK
                                                                                                       
    
    
    
    
    KURZWEIL  APPLIED                                                           INTELLIGENCE,
    INC.,                      RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL,
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,                                                                       
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.,                                                                        
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,                                                               L.L.P.,
    
                                                                            Defendants.
    .      .      .            .        I . . . . . . . .                                              
    
    
    
    
                                                      DEFENDANT  COOPERS  &  LYBRAND  L.L.P.'S
                           OPPOSITION
                                                               TO  PLAINTIFFS'                         
    
                         Defendant                                          Coopers             & 
            (tlC&LII)           opposes            plaintiffs'
    
    motion                            for                        class          certification.
    
                         Plaintiffs'                                           motion                 
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • STATES DISTRICT
  • COURT
  • BECKER, RAND1 ZINBERG, MARTIN
  • KURZWEIL APPLIED
  • Defendants.
  • DEFENDANT COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.'S
  • OPPOSITION
  • TO PLAINTIFFS'
  • MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
  • Securities
  • the class period
  • public offering
  • fraud action, plaintiffs
  • Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.
  • IPO prospectus.
  • Bernard Bradstreet,
  • stock price from $8.75 to $4.75.
  • moved to certify
  • theory of reliance.
  • traders directly
  • conflict with those who bought
  • alleged misrepresentation.
  • "fraud on the market"
  • TO THOSE WHO HAVE STANDING

  • 15 . PLF MTN FR ENTRY ORD DIST

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LOUISIANA
    
                                                                                                       
                . ,
    
    
         ,'
    
    
    
    
    
                                                      UNITED         STATES  DISTRICT                  
                                                                                                       
                                                FOR  THE  DISTRICT                        OF 
    
                     CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS                                     >
                     L.P.,         et  al.,
                                                    Plaintiffs,                            ,'
                                 -against-                                                            
                                                                                           i
                     KURZWEIL  APPLIED                 INTELLIGENCE,                       )
                     INC.,         et  al.,
                                                    Defendants.                           ,'
    
                    STUART  KALFON,                                                       ,'
                                                   Plaintiff            ,
                                 -against-                                                ,'       
                                                                                          1
                    KURZWEIL           APPLIED         INTELLIGENCE,                      )
                    INC.,         et  al.,
                                                 Defendants.
             T                                                                       ,'
    -ELLIOT                        BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,                          ,'
                    et  al.,                                                         )
    /-i\                                         Plaintiffs,
             \                  -against-                                            ,'            
                                                                                    1
                    KURZWEIL  APPLIED                 INTELLIGENCE,                 )
                    INC.,        et  al.,
                                                 Defendants,                        ,'
                                                                                    \
                   MARTIN  SEAMAN,                                                  i
                                                Plaintiff,
                               -against-                                           i               C.A.
                                                                                   )
                   KURZWEIL  APPLIED                 INTELLIGENCE,                 >
                   INC.,         et  al.,
                                                Defendants.                        ,'
    
                   TEACHERS'           RETIREMENT                SYSTEM            ,'
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • OF LOUISIANA,
  • Stipulation.

  • 16 . PLF MEM N SUP OF CLS CERT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COOPERS
    COMMON STOCK
    KURZWEIL
    DEFENDANT
    CLASS PERIOD
    CAC
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    CLASS ACTION
    CLASS MEMBERS
    CLASS CERTIFICATION
    DAMAGES
    CIVIL PROCEDURE
    COURT
    MOTION
    AUDIT
    SECURITIES
    PURCHASED KURZWEIL
    FORMER DEFENDANTS
    PURCHASERS
    KURZWEIL APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
    CSM PARTNERS
    MATERIALLY FALSE
    REPRESENTATION
    TYPICALITY REQUIREMENT
    TRANSACTIONS
    SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
    MISLEADING
    UNQUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION
    IPO
    
                                    UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                                       DISTRICT  OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    CAROL  S. MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
    ELLIOT  BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,
    MARTIN  SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'
    RETIREMENT         SYSTEM  OF  LOUISIANA,
    DARIN  5. LIEBER,  NEIL  F. O'CONNELL,
    THOMAS  J. O'CONNELL,             AND  KENNETH                         CA.  No.  94-10829-REK
    R. FIRST,  M.D.,
    
                              Plaintiffs,
    
                     V.
    
    KURZWEIL       APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,
    INC.,  RAYMOND  C. KURZWEIL,
    BERNARD  F. BRADSTREET,  ROBERTSON
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,  NEEDHAM
    &  COMPANY,  INC.  AND  COOPERS  &
    LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                              Defendants.
    
                               PLAINTIFFS'           MEMORANDUM           OF LAW  IN
                   SUPPORT  OF THEIR  MOTION  FOR  CLASS  CERTIFICATION
    
                                              P
                                              RELIMINAR_Y
    
            Plaintiffs  submit  this  memorandum  in  support  of  their  motion,  pursuant  to  Rule 
    
    Federal  Rules  of  Civil  Procedure,  for  certification  of  the following  class of  purchasers 
    
    Kurzweil  Applied  Intelligence,  Inc.  ~`Kurzweil"  or  the  "Company")  common  stock:
    
            All  persons  and  entities  (the  "Class")  who  purchased  Kurzweil  Applied
            Intelligence,  Inc.  ("Kurzweil")       common  stock between  August  17, 1993  and  April
            2X,  1994  (the  "Class  Period")  and  suffered  damages as a result.  Excluded  from
            the  Class are the  defendant  Coopers  &  Lybrand,  L.L.P.,  former  defendants
            Kurzweil,  Raymond  C. Kurzweil,  Bernard  F. Bradstreet,  Robertson  Stephens  &
            Company,  L-P., Needham  &  Company,  Inc.,  their  subsidiaries,  affiliates,
            members  of  the  immediate  families  of  each  of  the  individual  defendants  n
            the  Consolidated  Amended  Class Action  Complaint,  present  and  former  o
            directors,  partners  and  employees  of  each defendant  or  former  defendant
    
    
    
    CLASSZ.DOC
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAROL S. MORTON, CSM PARTNERS, ELLIOT BECKER, RAND1 ZINBERG, MARTIN SEAMAN, TEACHERS'
  • KURZWEIL APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, INC., RAYMOND C. KURZWEIL, BERNARD F. BRADSTREET, ROBERTSON
  • AND COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.,
  • SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
  • Plaintiffs submit this memorandum in support of their motion, pursuant to Rule 23 of the
  • for certification of the following class of purchasers of
  • All persons and entities who purchased Kurzweil Applied Intelligence, Inc. common stock
  • Excluded from the Class are the defendant Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P., former defendants
  • Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint alleges securities
  • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 1 Ob-5 promulgated thereunder,
  • CAC 77 6, 9-17.
  • the Court certified a class consisting of all persons who purchased
  • Kurzweil's IPO on August 17, 1993 through Kurzweil's announcement on April 4, 1994 that its
  • opinion certifying Kurzweil's financial statements for the year ending January 3 1,
  • On or about June 2,1994, Coopers acknowledged, by withdrawing its unqualified audit
  • Kurzweil's financial statements for that year were materially false and misleading,
  • The CAC identifies 45 specific transactions representing approximately
  • Coopers, however, issued an unqualified audit opinion on Kurzweil's financial statements
  • capitalization of software development costs.
  • [tlhere is little question that suits on behalf of shareholders alleging violations of
  • representation -- have been satisfied and one of the three requirements of Rule 23has been
  • potential class members is far fewer than the number here.
  • A plaintiffs claims satisfy the typicality requirement of Rule 23if, as here, "he

  • 17 . PLF MTN FR CLS CERT & DIS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FLOOR
    LERACH
    DEPOSITIONS
    DISCOVERY
    LYBRAND
    COOPERS
    STEPHENS
    CSM PARTNERS
    MORTON
    CAROL
    
                                                      UNITED              STATES  DISTRICT             
    
                                                           DISTRICT                 OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
    ELLIOT             BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,                                                  i
    MARTIN             SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'                                RETIREMENT)
    SYSTEM  OF  LOUISIANA,                                   DARIN  J.
    LIEBER,              NEIL                 F.  O'CONNELL,                                     ;
    THOMAS  J.  O'CONNELL,                                      and
    KENNETH  R.  FIRST,                              M.D.,                                       ;
    
                                                Plaintiffs,                                      ;     
         (REK)
    
                                V.                                                               ;
    
    KURZWEIL                   APPLIED              INTELLIGENCE,                                ;
    INC.,        RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL,
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,                                       ROBERTSON                     ;
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.                                          and                      ;
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                                                Defendants.
    
    
    
                                                                         SCHEDULING                ORDER
    
    I.          PLAINTIFFS'                        MOTION  FOR  CLASS  CERTIFICATION                   
                DISCOVERY
    
                1.              Plaintiffs                   will          file            a  Motion   
    
    on  or  before                            November           17,  1995.                   Coopers  
    overy
    
    on  issues                  relating               to  class                 certification         
    
    Discovery")                        for        a  120-day               period             following
    
    
    Motion             for        Class            Certification.                            Within    
            the
    
    conclusion                    of  that             period,                  the  parties           
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAROL S. MORTON, CSM PARTNERS,
  • STEPHENS & COMPANY, L.P.,
  • COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.,
  • DISCOVERY
  • Depositions
  • St Lerach
  • 49th Floor
  • Bader & Bader

  • 18 . RQST FR INT ASS REG EVDNC

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
    STULL
    BADER
    ELIOT
    HOAG
    FOLEY
    LAW OFFICES
    BRODY
    SHAPIRO HABER
    LERACH LLP
    WEISS BERSHAD HYNES
    AMERICA
    REQUEST
    WITNESSES
    MISLEADING
    CASEY
    PETER
    ATTORNEYS
    JOSEPH
    GATEWAY
    DEVALERIO
    URMY LLP
    EVIDENCE
    MORTON
    CAROL
    POST OFFICE SQUARE
    PROCEEDING
    PERTINENT
    PHILLIPS
    
                                         UNITED       STATES  DISTRICT                  COURT         
                                          DISTRICT            OF  MASSACHUSETTS
                                                                                                    
    
     CAROL  S.  MORTON,  et  al.,
    
                                           Plaintiffs,                     j
    
                      v..                                                             'C.A.  No. 
    
    KURZWEIL  APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,
    INC.:         RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL;
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET;  ROBERTSON                                    i
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.;
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.;                       and                  ;
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
                                                                           ;
                                          Defendants.                      1
    
    
                                   REQUEST  FOR  INTERNATIONAL                          JUDICIAL
                        ASSISTANCE  PURSUANT  TO  THE  HAGUE  CONVENTION
                             OF  18  MARCH  1970  ON  THE  TAKING  OF  EVIDENCE
                        BBROAD_IN
    
    
                      1.          This  request             is  being  made  by  the  United           
    
    District         Court        for  the  District                   of  Massachusetts,            
    
    Robert        E.  Keeton  presiding,                    U.S.        Post  Office         and 
    
    Devonshire          Street,          Boston,           Massachusetts               02109.
    
                      2.          This  request             is  made  to  the  Central                
                                                                                                       
    the  United         Kingdom,          at  the  High  Court  of  Justice,                         
    
    Division.
    
                      3.          The  executed             request         should        be  sent  to:
    
    P.  Dumain,         Esq.,       Milberg          Weiss  Bershad                  Hynes  &  Lerach  
    
    Pennsylvania              Plaza,      New  York,           NY  10119,  USA,  Telephone             
    
    594-5300,         Facsimile           No.:        (212)  868-1229.
    
                      4.          In  conformity              with       Article        3  of  the 
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAROL S. MORTON, et al.,
  • OF 18 MARCH 1970 ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE
  • MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP
  • SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP
  • BERMAN, DeVALERIO & PEASE LLP
  • BADER AND BADER
  • The Gateway
  • STULL STULL & BRODY
  • LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH H. WEISS
  • Steven W. Phillips
  • Peter M. Casey
  • FOLEY, HOAG & ELIOT
  • pertinent part:
  • misleading.
  • Witnesses
  • Request.
  • this proceeding.
  • of America.
  • One Post Office Square

  • 19 . CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COOPERS
    PAYMENTS
    CUSTOMER
    EMPHASIS
    BAVE RAISED COOPERS
    FLAGS
    LOSSES
    REPORT
    OPINION
    FACTUAL ALLEGATION RELATING
    MASSACHUSETTS
    OFFERINGTL
    LYBRAND
    STEPHENS
    KURZWEIL
    RAYMOND
    RETIREMENT
    TEACHERS
    MARTIN SEAMAN
    RAND1 ZINBERG
    ELLIOT BECKER
    CSM PARTNERS
    MORTON
    CAROL
    
                                                     UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT                      
                                                      DISTRICT            OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
          CAROL  S.  MORTON,  CSM  PARTNERS,
          ELLIOT  BECKER,  RAND1  ZINBERG,
          MARTIN  SEAMAN,  TEACHERS'  RETIREMENT)
          SYSTEM  OF  LOUISIANA,                        DARIN  J.
          LIEBER,        NEIL  F.  O'CONNELL,                                         1
          THOMAS  3.  O'CONNELL,                        and
          KENNETH  R.  FIRST,                     M.D.,                               ;           C.A. 
                                           Plaintiffs,                                ;
    
                                 V.
    
          KURZWEIL  APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                                            i
          INC.,       RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL,
          BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,  ROBERTSON                                         ;  JURY  TRIAL 
          STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,
          NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.  and                                             ;
          COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
    
                                           Defendants.
    
    
                                 CONSOLIDATED                  AMENDED  CLASS  ACTION                  
    
                            Plaintiffs,                     by  their        attorneys,             
    
          based  upon  information                           and  belief             and  upon  the 
    
          by  and  through                 their        attorneys            including,             
    
    I     review       of  internal                  documents,            press            releases,  
          filings       with            the  Securities               and  Exchange               
    
                                                                   INTRODUCTION
    
                            1.           This        is  a  class          action            brought   
    
          behalf       of  a  class               (the  ltClassl')            of  all           persons
    
          purchased         common  stock                    of  defendant             Kurzweil        
    
          Intelligence,                  Inc.        ("KurzweilVV           or  "the  Companytl)       
    
          period       between            August            17,  1993  and  April                  28, 
    
          ("the       Class  Period").
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAROL S. MORTON, CSM PARTNERS, ELLIOT BECKER, RAND1 ZINBERG, MARTIN SEAMAN, TEACHERS'
  • INC., RAYMOND C. KURZWEIL,
  • STEPHENS & COMPANY, L.P.,
  • COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.,
  • share .(the "Offeringtl).
  • Massachusetts.
  • FACTUAL ALLEGATION RELATING TO ALL CLAIMS
  • for its opinion.
  • report.
  • or losses.
  • Y&d Flags '1 That Should Bave Raised Coopers'
  • (Emphasis added).
  • SHIPPED TO CUSTOMER AND/OR SHIPPED WITHOUT
  • PAYMENTS MADE MORE THAN 90 DAYS AFTER SALES

  • 20 . ANSWER TO COMPLAINT & CLAIM

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    AVERMENTS
    TRUTH
    KURZWEIL
    SPEAKS
    ACCOUNTING
    REPORT
    STANDARDS
    KNOWLEDGE SUFFICIENT
    LACKS INFORMATION
    PLAINTIFFS
    AUDIT
    ADMITS
    PROSPECTUS
    COMMON STOCK
    INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
    SHARES
    DEFENDANT
    AUDITING
    MATTER
    COMPLAINT
    PURSUANT
    UNDERWRITERS
    PURCHASE
    PARTNERSHIP
    OMISSIONS
    RESPONSE
    DENIES
    ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
    INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE
    
                                      UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                                       DISTRICT  OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
                                                                      1
    CAROL  S. MORTON,  et al.,                                        >
    
                                                                      i
                              Plaintiffs,                             1
                                                                      1
                      V.                                              1
                                                                      )
    KURZWF3L  APPLIXD  INTELLIGENCE,                                  1
    INC.,  RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL,                                     1
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,  ROBERTSON                               >
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,                                      )
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.  and                                   1
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
                                                                      1
                   Defendants.                                        1
    
    
    
                             ANSWER  TO  CONSOLIDATED  AMENDED  CLASS
                                   ACTION  COMPLAINT  AND  JURY  CLAIM
    
           Defendant  Coopers &  Lybrand  L.L.P.,  a limited  liability  partnership  under the laws
    
    of  the State of  Delaware  since August  1,  1994, and prior  thereto a general partnership,
    
    hereinafter  referred  to as "C&L,"  hereby answers the Consolidated  Amended  Class Action
    
    Complaint  (the "Complaint").
    
                                                FIRST  DEFENSE
    
           With  respect to the averments in  the numbered paragraphs of  the Complaint,  C&L
    
    answers in  corresponding  numbered paragraphs as follows:
    
            1.                Denied,  except  C&L  admits  that plaintiffs  purport  to bring  a class
    
    action on behalf  of  a class of  all  persons or entities  who  purchased common  stock
    
    
    Defendant  Kurzweil  Applied  Intelligence,  Inc.  ("Rurzweil")  during  the period  between
    
    August  17,  1993 and April  28,  1994, inclusive.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • a limited liability partnership under the laws
  • With respect to the averments in the numbered paragraphs of the Complaint,
  • Defendant Kurzweil Applied Intelligence, Inc. during the period between
  • Kurzweil and certain selling stockholders offered for sale a total of 2,100,OOO shares of its
  • common stock and it granted the underwriters a 30 day option to purchase up to 315,000
  • the truth of the averments of paragraph 4.
  • information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
  • jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action as averred in paragraph 6.
  • were co-lead underwriters of the Offering.
  • that it is engaged in the business of, inter alia, providing accounting, auditing,
  • statements for the year ended January 31, 1993, which speaks for itself.
  • the truth of the averments of paragraph 24, except that it admits that plaintiffs purport to
  • bring this action as a class action pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • and certain selling shareholders identified in the Prospectus offered for sale 2,100,OOO
  • underwriters a 30 day option to purchase up to 315,000 additional shares of common stock
  • that it observed the profession's standards in performing its Kurzweil audit work.
  • The report shall state whether the financial statements are
  • Accounting Standards Board to establish accounting principles;
  • C&L lacks information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to
  • C&L denies the remaining averments of paragraph 66.
  • except C&L admits that its Report of Independent Accountants
  • Kurzweil's internal control structure and its operation,
  • letter dated February 9, 1993, was correct and that the response averred in paragraph 82
  • can be granted against C&L in that plaintiffs have failed to allege any valid legal basis upon
  • or omissions of parties other than C&L and said act or acts or omissions superseded any

  • 22 . C&L OPP TO PLF MTN

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANT
    LYBRAND
    COOPERS
    NEEDHAM
    ROBERTSON
    BRADSTREET
    BERNARD
    MORTON
    CAROL
    
                                            UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT                          COURT
                                             DISTRICT  OF  MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    CAROL  S.  MORTON,  et  al.,
    
                                   Plaintiffs,
    
                      V.                                                    1           C.A.  No. 
    
    KURZWEIL  APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                                        ;
    INC.,        RAYMOND  C.  KURZWEIL,
    BERNARD  F.  BRADSTREET,  ROBERTSON
    STEPHENS  &  COMPANY,  L.P.,                                            I
    NEEDHAM  &  COMPANY,  INC.  and
    COOPERS  &  LYBRAND,  L.L.P.,
                                                                            i
                                   Defendants.                              1
    
                             COOPERS  &  LYBRAND  L.L.P.'S                            OPPOSITION       
                                            PLAINTIFFS'           MOTION  TO  STRIKE
    
               Coopers         t  Lybrand           L.L.P.        (IvC&L1t),  independent              
    
    Kurzweil         Applied          Intelligence,                Inc.           (ttKurzweiltt),      
    
    Opposition          to  Plaintiffs'                 Motion        to  Strike.                
    
    strike        Exhibits           1  (the  amended  Medical                        Horizons,        
    
    confirmation               letter),            2  (the  Information                   against      
    
    Murray),         and  3  (the  Debra  J.  Murray  plea  agreement)                                 
    
    Memorandum  in  Support                        of  its  Motion                to  Dismiss          
    
    DismissI').              For  the  reasons                 set  forth           below,       
    
    should        be  denied.
    
    
                             The  Amended  Confirmation                            Letter        Has 
                                              Incorporated            By  Reference
    
               The  plaintiffs                erroneously           contend             that      this 
    
    foreclosed          from  considering                      the  amended  confirmation              
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAROL S. MORTON, et al.,
  • BERNARD F. BRADSTREET, ROBERTSON
  • NEEDHAM & COMPANY, INC. and
  • COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.,
  • defendant).
  • LIB-2 /0168193.01

  • 23 . PLF MEM OPP DEF MTD COMP

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COOPERS
    SECURITIES
    MOTION
    DISMISS
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    SECURITIES ACT
    COMPL
    REVENUE
    COMPLAINT
    KURZWEIL
    COURT
    SUPP
    STANDARDS
    FRAUD
    AUDIT
    DEFENDANTS
    ALLEGATIONS
    TRANSACTIONS
    LOSS CAUSATION
    PARTICULARITY
    DEVELOPMENT COSTS
    CLASS PERIOD
    AUDIT OPINION
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT
    RECKLESSNESS
    GAAS
    CORRECTIVE DISCLOSURE
    PRIMA FACIE
    DEFICIENCIES
    
                                         UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT  I;;,: i" ;&  ;-r .,, i  r,..
                                                                                                       
                                          DISTRICT  OF  MASSACHUSETTS                       iis: :  !.:
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                  a-
                                                                                  L , . .  2 : .: .,
                                                                >                          4 . . . .
    CAROL  S. MORTON,  and  CSM  PARTNERS,
    L.P.,  et al.,                                              i
                 V.  >
                        Plaintiffs,                             )
                                                                >
                                                                )  C.A.  No.  94-10829-REK
                                                                >
    KURZWEIL           APPLIED  INTELLIGENCE,                   >
    INC,,  et al.,                                              >
                                                                >
                        Defend&s.                               >
    
    
                         PLAINTIFFS'      MEMORANDUM          OF  LAW  IN  OPPOSITION               TO
                          DEFENDANT       COOPERS  &  LYBRAND  L.L.I'.`S  MUHON                    To
                DISMISS  TJilE  CONSOLIDATED           AMENDED  CLASS  ACTION  COMPLAINT
    
    
                                                               TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
    
    
    
         Pages
    
    
    PRELIMINARY          STATEMENT  .  .  .  ,  ,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
      .
    
    STATEMENTOFFACTS                        .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  ,  .  .  .  .  . 
     .  .  .  .  .  .
    
    ARGUMENT            ...................................................
    
    I.       THE  APPLICABLE  STANDARDS  ON  A  MOTION  To  DISMISS  ..............
    
    II.      THE  COMPLAINT                  STATES  A  VALID  CAUSE  OF  ACTION
             UNDER  SECIION  11 OF  THE  SECURITIES  ACT  ,  f  ,  ,  _ _ .  _ .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . 
    
             A.       Plaintiffs  Have  Stated A  Prima  Facie  Claim  Under  Section  11  .  .  .  . 
    
             B.       Rule  9(b)  Does  Not  Apply  To  Plaintiffs'  Section  11  Claim  .  .  .  .  . 
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS ON A MOTION To DISMISS
  • UNDER SECIION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT, f,, _ _.
  • Plaintiffs Have Stated A Prima Facie Claim Under Section 11.
  • Plaintiffs Have Standing To Maintain Their Securities Act Claims.
  • Plaintiffs Have Properly Alleged That Coopers Acted With Scienter.
  • Plainti& Have Properly Alleged Loss Causation.
  • Complaint (the "Complaint" or "Compl.
  • These consolidated actions concern a massive fraud perpetrated on the investing public
  • by Kurzweil Applied Intelligence Inc.,
  • The fraudulent scheme involved the improper recognition of revenue by Kurzweil from:
  • transactions which were not bonafide; transactions where the collectibility of accounts
  • and the improper capitalization of software development costs for, among other things, a
  • required accounting principles and auditing procedures in auditing the FY 1993 financial
  • Coopers acknowledged the extent of the fraud when it later withdrew its audit report
  • Further, as discussed below, plaintiffs have pleaded with particularity the facts surrounding
  • the Court should deny Coopers' motion to dismiss
  • The Complaint identifies the reasons, acknowledged by defendants, that
  • GAAS and issued an unaualified audit opinion for Kurzweil's FY 1993 financial statements.
  • its allegations are taken as true.
  • false or misleading information is included in a registration statement filed with the SEC.
  • Taylor Sec. Litig., 807 F. Supp.
  • deficiencies in the Complaint in this regard to make absolutely clear that the Section 11
  • suggesting that the pleading of auditor recklessness is insufficient
  • during the Class Period, auditing the Company's financial