LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BULL HN INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC v XA SYSTEMS CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: BHISIVXSC258524, CourtName: MA DC, Plaintiff: BULL HN INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>BHISIVXSC258524, Retrofit, Contract, Kpmg, Market, Peat Marwick, Re-engineering, Court Department, Interrogatory, Profits, Damages, Softvare, Jury, Sup, Track Designation, Hare, Superior, Bull, Non-jury Hearing, Judgement, Pending, Related Action, Ntlfy, Excess, Loss, Unique Remengineering, Recovery, Ukellhood, Warrant, Money Damages, Particularity, Tort Action, Pathw, Customers, Competition, License, Kpmg Peat Marwick, Patrvu, Defendant Richard Worrall, Systems Corporation , ContentID: 120253986

Case Documents
1 1990-09-21 INTERROGATORIES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130668
14 pages
PDF
2 1990-09-21 AFFDVT OF SRVC OF TRK ORD
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130665
3 pages
PDF
3 1990-08-17 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130667
40 pages
PDF
4 1990-08-17 CIVIL COVER SHEET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130666
2 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 4 documents , 59 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . INTERROGATORIES

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INTERROGATORY
PLAINTIFF
PATRVU
DEFENDANT RICHARD WORRALL
SYSTEMS CORPORATION
PEAT MARWICK
                                            COMMONWEALTH

  MIDDLESEX,                SS.
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   


 BULL  HN  INFORMATION                             SYSTEMS  INC.                          1
                                                                                          )        
                                                                                          1
                                      Plaintiff,                                          1
                                                                                          1
 V.                                                                                       1
 XA  SYSTEMS  CORPORATION                              and                                1
 RICHARD             WORRALL,             an  individual,
 as  a  representative                            of  a  class
 comprised               of  all         partners               in
 the        general          partnership                 doing
 business               as  KPMG  PEAT  MARWICX                                           1

                                     Defendants.



                                       INTERROGATORIES                             PROPOUNDED  BY 
                           PLAINTIFF                 BULL  HN  INFORMATION                         
                                   TO  THE  DEFENDANT  XA  SYSTEMS  CORPORATION


             1.          Kindly          state         your            full          name,        

hold         in  the        defendant                XA  Systems                     Corporation   

referred              to  as  "xA  Systems").



             2.         Kindly          state         whether                   you  have          

inquiry             of  the         defendant            XA  Systems'                          

and  available                     business           records                   prior           to 

interrogatories.



            3.          Kindly         describe            in  complete                         

SNIPPETS:
  • Peat Marwick;
  • RETROFIT.
  • interrogatory.
  • SYSTEMS TO THE DEFENDANT RICHARD WORRALL
  • PATRVU and RETROFIT.
  • plaintiff.

  • 2 . AFFDVT OF SRVC OF TRK ORD

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    No key words
    found in document.
    --------------
    This indicates that
    document is an image.
    --------------
    Images in PDF files
    often contain text
    readable by persons
    but not by scanners.
    
    MIDDLESEX,           SS.                                                             SUPERIOR  COURT
                                                                                         DEPARTMENT  0~
                                                                                         THE  TRIAL 
    
    
    BULL  HN  INFORMATION                     SYSTEMS  INC.                              CIVIL       
    
                                    Plaintiff,                                 i
    v.                                                                         ;         AFFIDAVIT     
    XA  SYSTEMS  CORPORATION  and                                              ;         OF  TRACKING 
    RICHARD  WORRALL,  an  individual,
    as  a  representative                     of  a  class                     i
    comprised          of  all         partners           in
    the  general              partnership             doing                    !
    business          as  KPMG  PEAT  MAEWICK
                                                                               1
                                    Defendants.                                1
    
    
    
    
                I,  Brendan          M.  Hare,          counsel         for  the  plaintiff            
    
    captioned          action,           hereby         certify         that          I  caused  a 
    
    Tracking         Order  to  be  served                       by  Federal           Express        
    
    on  September              19,  1990  as  follows:                        to  the  defendant       
    
    Federal         Express           said  tracking                order       to  its       counsel: 
    
    Salmon,         Esq.,        Brobeck,            Phleger         and  Harrison,                 
    
    Place,         220  Geng  Road,  Palo  Alto,                        California,                 
    
    Bonn  III,         Esq.,         Dechert          Price         &  Rhoads,           Ten  Post 
    
    South,        Boston,         Massachusetts,                    02109;           and  to  the 
    
    Worrall        by  Federal             Express         said  tracking                  order      
    
    Richard         I.  Miller,            Esq.,       Associate               General        Counsel, 
    
    
    Marwick,        767  5th  Avenue,        New  York,         New  York,      10153.
    
              Signed     under     the  pains     and  penalties           of  perjury          this   
    
    day  of  September,            1990.
    
    SNIPPETS:

    3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    KPMG
    BULL
    PATHW
    MARKET
    CUSTOMERS
    COMPETITION
    BUSINESS
    CONTRACT
    LICENSE
    PROFITS
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK
    
                                            COMMONWEALTH OF  MASSACHUSETTS
     MIDDLESEX,  SS.                                                                        SUPERIOR 
                                                                                            DEPARTMENT 
                                                                                            THE  TRIAL 
    
    
     BULL  HN  INFORMATION  SYSTEMS  INC.                                      1
                                                                               )            CIVIL 
                                       Plaintiff,
    
    V.
                                                                                            COMP~INT 
    XA  SYSTEMS              CORPORATION  and                                               JURY  DEMAND
     RICHARD  WOW,                        an  individual,
     as  a  representative                      of  a  class
     comprised             of  all        partners           in
    the  general              partnership              doing                   1
    business              as  KPMG  PEAT  MARWICK                              i 1
                                       Defendants.                           1
    
    
    
                                                                    PARTIES
                1.         The  plaintiff,              Bull         BN  information               
    
     ("Bull            BN")  is  a  corporation                     duly  organized                by 
    
    of  Delaware              with  a  principal                    place  of  business               
    
    Billerica,              Middles&x            County,            Massachusetts.
    
    
                2.         The  defendant              XA  Systems  Corporation                       
    
    a  corporation               duly  organized                    by  law  in  the  state            
    
    with  its  principal                     place  of  business                       located      at 
    
    Avenue,             Los  Gatos,          California.
    
    
                3.        On  information               and  belief            the  defendant,         
    
    Worrall,             is  an  individual              residing           in  the  State  of  New 
    
    is  a  partner             of  the  general                partnership                 of 
    
    
     accountants                   doing        business          as  RPMG  Peat  Marwick              
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • became KPMG Peat Marwick.
  • and RETROFIT.
  • On or about November 30, 1989 KPMG and XA Systems met
  • the Contract,
  • between Bull HN and KPMG.
  • competition.
  • Customers.
  • in the C&SE market.
  • PATHW and RETROFIT.

  • 4 . CIVIL COVER SHEET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    RE-ENGINEERING
    COURT DEPARTMENT
    MARKET
    DAMAGES
    SOFTVARE
    PEAT MARWICK
    KPMG
    JURY
    SUP
    TRACK DESIGNATION
    HARE
    SUPERIOR
    NON-JURY HEARING
    JUDGEMENT
    PENDING
    RELATED ACTION
    NTLFY
    EXCESS
    PROFITS
    LOSS
    UNIQUE REMENGINEERING
    DEFENDANTS
    RECOVERY
    UKELLHOOD
    WARRANT
    MONEY DAMAGES
    PARTICULARITY
    TORT ACTION
    
                                                        rLcAac           1 rri5  OH  PRlNT             
     TURE  1s  REQUIRED
    
        !                I
                                                                                                 Trial 
                                      DOCKET  NUMBER
     CIVIL  ACTlON  COVER  SHEET                                                                
                                            90-5756
                                                                                                       
    vision
    AlNTIFF(S)                                                                                         
        XA      bystars  Coqxxatlon              ard  &hard     Worrall
    ull  HN  Information                                Systems  Inc.                                  
           as ,a  representative  of  a  class  cwprised
                                                                                                       
      the  gemral  partnership  d/b/a  KEW
    TORNEYfS)           IWM        NAME.  ADDRESS         AND  TEL.)
    rendan  M.  Hare                                                                                   
     (if  known)
                                                                          (6  171423-3660
    ickens  ,  Hare,  Koches  &  Brooks
    9  Federal                   Street
    %c%            BE  O~%%a                      #  (Required)                 22  1480
    
                                                                         ORIGIN  COOE  AND  TRACK 
    >lace  an  IXl  in  one  box  only:                                                                
      g  I.  FOl  Original  Complaint                                                                  
    Appeal  ~231,  s.  97  V)
      !I  2. FO2  Removal  to  Sup.  Ct.  ~231,  s.  104  (F)                                          
    ter  Rescript: Relief  from
      0  3. FO3  Retransfer  to  Sup.  Ct. ~231,  S.  102c  (x)
    
    
                                                                                   N  AND  TRACK 
     (See  Revme                    Side)
     CODE NO.
                                            THIS  A  JURY  CASE?
    
    
    
     1.  PLEASE  F;lVEj  A  CONCISE  STATEMENT                                                OF  THE 
     Types  of  Actions)
              Th@  Plalntlff                     had  a  contract                     with  KpMG  peat 
                              world  wide  license
              right             t0  softvare               re-engineering                        tools 
                      with  KF%G Peat  Marwick  in
              a  joint              development                Of  other  versions                     
     a  unique  re-engineering                          program
              for  EheYvell                      computers.                      KPMG and  U  System,  
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COURT DEPARTMENT
  • ADDRESS AND TEL.) rendan M. Hare
  • ORIGIN COOE AND TRACK DESIGNATION>lace an IXl in one box only:
  • FO3 Retransfer to Sup.
  • THIS A JURY CASE?
  • with KpMG peat Marwick for exclusive
  • world wide license right t0 softvare
  • a unique re-engineering
  • KPMG and U System,
  • IN A CONTRACT
  • ACTION CjR A TORT ACTION
  • STATE, WITH PARTICULARITY, MONEY DAMAGES
  • WHICH WOULD WARRANT
  • UKELlHOOD
  • THAT RECOVERY WOULD EXCEED $25,000:
  • of the defendants'
  • actions, the plaintiff
  • of these unique remengineering
  • in terms of loss of Profits
  • market and its international
  • in excess of Three Million
  • PLEASE =NTlFY, BY CASE NUMBER, NAME AND DIVISION,
  • ANY RELATED ACTION
  • PENDING IN THE SUPERIOR
  • Before jury trial or non-jury hearing m, m..;,- .,_.
  •    |