LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MARC ABRAMS v CONCORD EFS INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: MAVCEI137575, CourtName: MISC 3, Plaintiff: MARC ABRAMS, State: TN Tennessee, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>MAVCEI137575, Concord, Stock, Act, Securities, Exchange, Damages, Class Action, Growth, Concord Efs, Earnings, Misleading, Acquisition, Reports, Connection, Transaction, Operating Plans, Financial Statements, Corporate Officers, Operations Compared Thereto, Times Relevant Hereto, Future Business, Net Income, Diluted Earnings, Management, Allegation, Internal Corporate, Advantage Ofthe Defendants , ContentID: 120253772

Case Documents
1   CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130167
31 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 31 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
STOCK
ACT
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
DAMAGES
CLASS ACTION
GROWTH
CONCORD EFS
EARNINGS
MISLEADING
MEMBERS
ACQUISITION
REPORTS
CONNECTION
TRANSACTION
OPERATING PLANS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CORPORATE OFFICERS
OPERATIONS COMPARED THERETO
TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
FUTURE BUSINESS
NET INCOME
DILUTED EARNINGS
MANAGEMENT
ALLEGATION
INTERNAL CORPORATE
ADVANTAGE OFTHE DEFENDANTS
                              UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                             WESTERN  DISTRICT  OF TENNESSEE
                                         WESTERN  DMSION                                    Robert
                                                                                                  
                                                                                          CLERK
                                                                                                 
                                                                                                   
                                                                                          \Y,rs.t3.
                                                                                               OF
Marc Abrams,  On Behalf  of Himself                            >     Civ. Action  No.
and All  Others Similarly  Situated,                           >                02-2735            
                                                               >
                                 Plaintiff,
        vs.                                                    3
                                                               1  CLASS  ACTION  COMPLAINT
CONCORD  EFS, INC.,  DAN  M.  PALMER,                          >
EDWARD  A. LABRY,  III,  MARCIA  Es                            >
H-EISTER, WILLLAM  E. LUCADO,                                  >
CHRISTOPHER  S. RJXKBRT,  E. MILBS                             >     JURY  TRIAL  DEMANDED
KILBUKN,  EDWARD  T. HASLAM,                                   >
RONALD  V.  CONGEMI  and  RTCHARD               P.             >
KIPHART,                                                       .
                                                               i      -
                                Defendants.                    >


        Plaintif&  Marc Abrarns, individually  and on behalf of all other persons similarly 

by his undersigned attorneys, alleges the following  based upon personal knowledge  as to himself

and his own  acts, and information  and .belief as to all oth,er matters, based upon, inter  alia, 

i,nvestigation conducted by and through his attorneys, which  included, among other things, a

review  of the public  documents and announcements made by the defendants, Securities and

Exchange Commission  ("SEC")  filings,  and press releases regarding Concord EFS, Inc.

("Concord"  or the "Company"),  and plaintiff  believes fiat  substantial evidentiary support will

exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity  for discovery.


                                    NATURE       OF  THE  ACTION

        1.      This is a class action brought by plaintiff  on behalf of himself  and a Cl.ass



SNIPPETS:
  • Exchange Commission filings, and press releases regarding Concord EFS, Inc.
  • This is a class action brought by plaintiff on behalf of himself and a Cl.ass consisting
  • defendants' violation of federal sectities laws.
  • and/or failed to correct false and misleading fmancial statements and press releases
  • The claims alleged herein arise under Sections 10and 20of the Securities
  • Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. $9 78j@) and 78t, and Rule lob-5, 17
  • III connection with the acts, transactions and conduct alleged herein, defendants,
  • Concord is an electronic transaction processor,
  • stock was traded throughout the Class Period in an efficient market on the NASDAQ National
  • Concord's business, as well as its fmances, markets and present and future business prospects
  • other corporate officers and employees, attendance at management andBoard of Directors'
  • and/or committees thereof and via reports and other information provided to him in connection
  • Moreover, Palmer took advantage ofthe defendants' false statements, selling at least 1 s
  • via access to-internal corporate documents (including the Company's operating plans,
  • attendbee at management and/or Board of Directors'
  • Defendant Marcia E. Heister was, at al.1 times relevant hereto,
  • prospects via access to internal corporate documients (including the Company's operating
  • as to constitute a fraud and deceit upon plaintiff and the other members of the Class.
  • Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
  • and, if so, what is the proper measure of damages.
  • The acquisition boosted Concord's sales force by nearly half.
  • able to report strong revenue and earnings growth from the mid-l 990s into 2001 due to its
  • growth in net income and earnings per share was 41% and 34% for the third quarter of 200 1
  • Net income was $8 1.5 million in tie third quarter of 2001, or $0.16 diluted earnings per
  • The financial statements and related press releases by the Company
  • Plaintiff repeats and reiterates each and every allegation contained in each,
  •    |