LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CHRISTOPHER A. LOWRY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-2052, Defendant: Christopher A. Lowry, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-2052, Lowry, Investment Adviser, Offering Proceeds, Clients, Securities Laws, Investors, Commission, Advisers Act, Advisory Clients, No-load Advisors, Exchange, Injunction, Misrepresentations, Materials, Christopher, Material Facts, Respondent, Appeals, Funds, Business Plan, Registered Investment Adviser, Connection, President, Provision, Permanent Injunction, Violating, Enforcement, University Stock, Representations, Diversion , ContentID: 120253712

Case Documents
1 2002-08-30 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130082
12 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 12 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTMENT ADVISER
OFFERING PROCEEDS
CLIENTS
SECURITIES LAWS
INVESTORS
COMMISSION
ADVISERS ACT
ADVISORY CLIENTS
NO-LOAD ADVISORS
EXCHANGE
INJUNCTION
MISREPRESENTATIONS
MATERIALS
CHRISTOPHER
MATERIAL FACTS
RESPONDENT
APPEALS
FUNDS
BUSINESS PLAN
REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISER
CONNECTION
PRESIDENT
PROVISION
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
VIOLATING
ENFORCEMENT
UNIVERSITY STOCK
REPRESENTATIONS
DIVERSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Rel. No. 2052 / August 30, 2002

   Admin. Proc. File No. 3-10390
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   CHRISTOPHER A. LOWRY
     _________________________________________________________________

   OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
   INVESTMENT ADVISER PROCEEDING

   Grounds for Remedial Action

   Injunction
       Misrepresentations and Omissions of Material Facts

   President of registered investment adviser violated the antifraud
   provisions of the securities laws in connection with
   misrepresentations that he made to investors, who were also his
   advisory clients, of his use of offering proceeds, and his diversion
   of the proceeds to his personal use. He is subject to a permanent
   injunction for violating the securities laws. Held, it is in the
   public interest to bar respondent from association with any investment
   adviser.

   APPEARANCES
   David W. Larson, of Martin & Squires, P.A., for Christopher A. Lowry.
       Kenneth E. Yeadon and Linda Ieleja Gerstman, for the Division of
       Enforcement.

   Appeal filed October 11, 2001
   Last brief received January 23, 2002

                                     I.

   Christopher A. Lowry, president of Lowry Investors Services, Inc.,
   d/b/a No-Load Advisors ("No-Load Advisors"), a registered investment
   adviser during the relevant period, appeals from anadministrative law
   judge's decision. The law judge concluded that Lowry should be barred
   from association with any investment adviser in connection with
   misrepresentations that he made to his advisory clients regarding his
   use of offering proceeds invested in a second company that he
SNIPPETS:
  • CHRISTOPHER A. LOWRY
  • OPINION OF THE COMMISSION INVESTMENT ADVISER PROCEEDING
  • President of registered investment adviser violated the antifraud provisions of the
  • He is subject to a permanent injunction for violating the securities laws.
  • it is in the public interest to bar respondent from association with any investment adviser.
  • David W. Larson, of Martin & Squires, P.A., for Christopher A. Lowry.
  • Christopher A. Lowry, president of Lowry Investors Services, Inc., d/b/a No-Load Advisors, a
  • In 1988, he incorporated No-Load Advisors, a registered investment adviser.
  • Lowry had exclusive control over the No-Load Advisors checking account and the disbursement
  • The business plan stated that Lowry sought to raise $1.5 million to finance the capital and
  • Equipment $ 70,000 Debt Retirement $ 85,000 Marketing Blitz $ 65,000 401University
  • Lowry acknowledged that the proceeds from the sale of 401University stock comprised nearly
  • Lowry's use of 401University offering proceeds to purchase a house was contrary to the
  • The complaint sought a permanent injunction for Lowry's misrepresentations concerning the use
  • On December 7, 2000, the district court permanently enjoined Lowry and his company, with
  • Under 203of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, we may sanction a person associated with an
  • Section 203permits us to impose sanctions where, among other things, the person has willfully
  • As an associated person of an investment adviser, Lowry was a fiduciary with a duty to act in
  • Lowry was notified by the Division of Enforcement that, in accordance with the terms of his
  •    |