LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DAVID E. LYNCH Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-46439, Defendant: David E. Lynch, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-46439, Securities, Lynch, Exchange Act, Dealer, Commission, Violations, Scheme, Transactions, Proceeding, Excessive Markups, Non-bona Fide Prices, Customers, First Montauk, David, Exchange Act Rule, Broker-dealer, Books, Deficiencies, Committing, Civil Money Penalty, Respondent, Future Violations, Houston Branch Office, Disclose Excessive Markups, Parking Scheme, Substantial Pecuniary Gain, Rural Route, Remedial Action, Recordkeeping Violations, Effected Transactions , ContentID: 120253711

Case Documents
1 2002-08-30 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130081
10 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 10 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LYNCH
EXCHANGE ACT
DEALER
COMMISSION
VIOLATIONS
SCHEME
TRANSACTIONS
PROCEEDING
EXCESSIVE MARKUPS
NON-BONA FIDE PRICES
CUSTOMERS
FIRST MONTAUK
DAVID
EXCHANGE ACT RULE
BROKER-DEALER
BOOKS
DEFICIENCIES
COMMITTING
CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
RESPONDENT
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
HOUSTON BRANCH OFFICE
DISCLOSE EXCESSIVE MARKUPS
PARKING SCHEME
SUBSTANTIAL PECUNIARY GAIN
RURAL ROUTE
REMEDIAL ACTION
RECORDKEEPING VIOLATIONS
EFFECTED TRANSACTIONS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Rel. No. 46439 / August 30, 2002

   Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9440
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   DAVID E. LYNCH
   Rural Route #1
   Box 200
   Milam, Texas 75959
     _________________________________________________________________

   OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
   BROKER-DEALER PROCEEDING
       CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDING

   Grounds for Remedial Action

   Failure to Disclose Excessive Markups
       Charging Non-Bona Fide Prices of Securities
       Aiding and Abetting Net Capital and Recordkeeping Violations

   Respondent, an associated person and trader at a broker-dealer,
   engaged in a scheme to "park" securities with other dealers. He
   effected transactions at non-bona fide prices and charged undisclosed,
   excessive markups to the firm's customers. As a result of this scheme,
   the broker-dealer failed to maintain accurate books and records and
   incurred numerous net-capital deficiencies. Held, it is in the public
   interest that respondent be ordered to cease and desist from
   committing or causing any violations or future violations of Section
   17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b), 15(c), and 17(a)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5,
   15c3-1, 17a-3, 17a-5, and 17a-11; be barred from association with any
   broker or dealer; and pay a third-tier civil money penalty in the
   amount of $100,000.

   APPEARANCES
   Teresa J. Verges, for the Division of Enforcement.
       No appearance on appeal for David E. Lynch.

   Appeal filed December 5, 2001
   Last brief received January 22, 2002

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Rural Route #1 Box 200 Milam,
  • OPINION OF THE COMMISSION BROKER-DEALER PROCEEDING CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDING
  • Grounds for Remedial Action
  • Failure to Disclose Excessive Markups
  • Aiding and Abetting Net Capital and Recordkeeping Violations
  • Respondent, an associated person and trader at a broker-dealer, engaged in a scheme to "park"
  • He effected transactions at non-bona fide prices and charged undisclosed, excessive markups
  • As a result of this scheme, the broker-dealer failed to maintain accurate books and records
  • Held, it is in the public interest that respondent be ordered to cease and desist from
  • No appearance on appeal for David E. Lynch.
  • The Division of Enforcement appeals the amount of the civil money penalty imposed by an
  • Lynch was a trader associated with First Montauk in its Houston branch office.
  • First Montauk granted the Houston branch office the authority to execute riskless principal
  • Lynch and others used the parking scheme to manipulate the prices of certain government
  • Properly recording these transactions on First Montauk's books and records would have
  • Theparking scheme also caused First Montauk to file inaccurate Financial and Operational
  • We find that Lynch's misconduct both caused substantial losses to First Montauk's customers
  •    |