LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v H. J. MEYERS & CO., INC., ROBERT SETTEDUCATI, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 211, Defendant: H. J. Meyers & Co., Inc., Robert Setteducati, William Masucci, Michael Vanechanos, and James Alan Villa James T. Kelly, Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-10140, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>211, Setteducati, Borealis, Securities, Exchange Act, Commission, Oip, Masucci, Shares, Ipo, Hjm, Customers, Branch Office, Trading, Price, Villa, Representatives, Vanechanos, Aftermarket, Branch Office Managers, Manipulation, Instituting, Underwriting, Penalty Bid, Selling Group, Chicago Branch, Respondent, San Francisco, Allocation, Tja , ContentID: 120253710

Case Documents
1 2002-08-09 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130079
73 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 73 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BOREALIS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT
COMMISSION
OIP
MASUCCI
SHARES
IPO
HJM
CUSTOMERS
BRANCH OFFICE
TRADING
LAW
PRICE
VILLA
REPRESENTATIVES
VANECHANOS
AFTERMARKET
BRANCH OFFICE MANAGERS
MANIPULATION
INSTITUTING
UNDERWRITING
PENALTY BID
SELLING GROUP
CHICAGO BRANCH
RESPONDENT
SAN FRANCISCO
ALLOCATION
TJA
Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge

H. J. Meyers & Co., Inc., Robert Setteducati, William Masucci, Michael
Vanechanos, and James Alan Villa

                                         INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 211
                                                ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                                                         FILE NO. 3-10140

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                 Before the
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, D.C.
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   H.J. MEYERS & CO., INC.,
   ROBERT SETTEDUCATI,
   WILLIAM MASUCCI,
   MICHAEL VANECHANOS, and
   JAMES ALAN VILLA.
     _________________________________________________________________

   INITIAL DECISION

   August 9, 2002

   APPEARANCES John E. Birkenheier, Joy M. Boddie, Charles J. Kerstetter,
   and Sean E. Kreiger for the Division of Enforcement, Securities and
   Exchange Commission.

   Thomas M. Knepper for Respondent.
   BEFORE James T. Kelly, Administrative Law Judge

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) issued its
   Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP) on February 7, 2000, pursuant to
   Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Sections
   15(b), 19(h), and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange
   Act).

   The OIP focuses on events that occurred during June 1996, when Robert
   Setteducati (Setteducati) was the executive vice president of H.J.
   Meyers & Co., Inc. (HJM), a registered broker and dealer. On June 24,
   1996, HJM was the lead underwriter for an initial public offering
   (IPO) of the common stock of Borealis Technology Corporation
   (Borealis). In relevant part, the OIP alleges that, from June 24,
   1996, through June 28, 1996, HJM, acting through Setteducati and
SNIPPETS:
  • Initial Decision of an SEC Administrative Law Judge
  • H. J. Meyers & Co., Inc., Robert Setteducati, William Masucci, Michael Vanechanos, and James
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • H.J. MEYERS & CO., INC., ROBERT SETTEDUCATI, WILLIAM MASUCCI,
  • JAMES ALAN VILLA.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission issued its Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP) on
  • On June 24, 1996, HJM was the lead underwriter for an initial public offering (IPO) of the
  • In relevant part, the OIP alleges that, from June 24, 1996, through June 28, 1996, HJM,
  • The OIP charges that Setteducati and another HJM official orchestrated the allocation of the e and prevent non-favored customers from "flipping" their IPO shares in the immediate aftermarket.
  • In March 1995, TJA acquired HJM, a broker and dealer with a main office in Beverly Hills,
  • Paragraph II.G of the OIP alleges that the settlements in two regulatory actions against TJA,
  • The Commission alleged that, in connection with the underwriting of the IPOs of four
  • On July 15, 1996-three weeks after the Borealis IPO that is the subject of this
  • Setteducati began his career as a registered representative in a Florida branch office of TJA.
  • OIP ¶ II.J charges that the allocation "was made for the purpose of" enhancing HJM's "control
  • He also added the overallotment option and included a 20% allocation to the selling group, as
  • The Division's case was not designed to show that sales fraud occurred, but rather to
  • The Division does not claim that there is anything per se wrong with the penalty bid.
  • To prevail under Section 17of the Securities Act, Section 10of the Exchange Act, and Rule
  •    |