LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MICHAEL L. SMIRLOCK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-2046, Defendant: Michael L. Smirlock, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-2046, Advisers Act, Smirlock, Commission, Proceeding, Investment, Violating, Michael, Findings, Securities, Exchange, Sanctions, Respondent, District, United States, Matter, Instituting Proceedings, Sanctions Set, Hedge Funds, Hereby, Admitting, Laser Advisers, Investment Portfolio, States District Court, Southern District, York, Thereunder, Causing, Aiding, Abetting Violations, Complaint , ContentID: 120253697

Case Documents
1 2002-08-12 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 130065
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SMIRLOCK
COMMISSION
PROCEEDING
INVESTMENT
VIOLATING
MICHAEL
FINDINGS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
SANCTIONS
RESPONDENT
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES
MATTER
INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
SANCTIONS SET
HEDGE FUNDS
HEREBY
ADMITTING
LASER ADVISERS
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
YORK
THEREUNDER
CAUSING
AIDING
ABETTING VIOLATIONS
COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 2046 / August 12, 2002

   ADMINSTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10861
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   MICHAEL L. SMIRLOCK,

                                                             Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTIONS

                                     I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that proceedings be, and hereby
   are, instituted pursuant to Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers
   Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") against Michael L. Smirlock
   ("Respondent")

                                    II.

   In anticipation of these proceedings, the Respondent has submitted an
   Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission has determined to
   accept. Solely for the purpose of this proceeding, and any other
   proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or in which the
   Commission is a party, without admitting or denying the findings
   contained herein, expect the Commission's findings set forth in
   Paragraphs III. A., III.B. and III.D., and the Commission's
   jurisdiction over him and over the subject of this proceeding, which
   are admitted, Respondent has consented to the issuance of this Order
   Instituting Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial
   Sanctions ("Order"), and to the entry of the findings and the
   imposition of the remedial sanctions set forth below.

                                    III.

   On the basis of this Order and the Respondent's Offer, the Commission
   finds that
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • INVESMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
  • In the Matter of
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • the Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement which the Commission has determined to
  • Solely for the purpose of this proceeding, and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf
  • Sanctions, and to the entry of the findings and the imposition of the remedial sanctions set
  • At all relevant times, Smirlock was Chairman, President and CEO, a director and majority
  • At Laser Advisers, Inc., Smirlock, among other things, managed an investment portfolio for
  • The Commission's complaint in alleged,, that from December 1997 to June 1998, Smirlock
  • No.00CR1292, based on the same conduct at issue in the Commission's civil injunctive action,
  • Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent be, and hereby is, barred from association with
  •    |