SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 17747 / September 26, 2002
SEC FILES SECOND CONTEMPT MOTION AGAINST ROC HATFIELD
AND GLOBAL DIAMOND FUND, INC.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. MARADA GLOBAL CORPORATION, et al.,
Case No. 94-CV-1504 (M.D. Fla.)
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that on April
10, 2002, it filed with the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida, an Application for an Order to Show Cause
why Roc Hatfield and Global Diamond Fund, Inc. (GDF) should not be
held in civil contempt for failing to comply with the Court's Order of
March 26, 2002, requiring them to file a sworn accounting.
On March 26, 2002, the SEC filed its first motion for contempt and for
other emergency relief against Hatfield and GDF for violating the
Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief entered on
September 8, 1995, in , Case No. 94-CV-1504-CIV-T-26MAP (M.D. Fla.).
The Marada final judgment prohibited Hatfield from violating the penny
stock, registration and antifraud provisions of the federal securities
laws.
The SEC alleged that from at least September 2001 through the filing
of the first contempt motion, Hatfield and GDF (a private Florida
corporation founded and operated by Hatfield in St. Petersburg,
Florida) violated Sections 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933 and the Marada final judgment by fraudulently offering
unregistered securities in the form of nine-month 24% APR high yield
secured notes. On April 25, 2002, the SEC amended its motion to also
allege that Hatfield and GDF were in contempt of the Marada final
judgment by violating Section 5(a) of the Securities Act and Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder.
On March 26, 2002, the Court entered an order freezing Hatfield and
GDF's assets, an order prohibiting the destruction of documents and
expediting discovery, and an order requiring Hatfield and GDF to
provide, within 5 business days, a sworn accounting of all monies,
among other relief. Neither Hatfield nor GDF filed their sworn
accountings. The SEC requested that the Court find Hatfield and GDF in
civil contempt and incarcerate Hatfield until he complied with the
Court's Order. On April 19, 2002, Hatfield and GDF filed their sworn
accountings.
SNIPPETS:
SEC FILES SECOND CONTEMPT MOTION AGAINST ROC HATFIELD AND GLOBAL DIAMOND FUND,
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. MARADA GLOBAL CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 94-CV-1504
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on April 10, 2002, it filed with the
On March 26, 2002, the SEC filed its first motion for contempt and for other emergency relief
Fla.).
The Marada final judgment prohibited Hatfield from violating the penny stock, registration
The SEC alleged that from at least September 2001 through the filing of the first contempt
On April 25, 2002, the SEC amended its motion to also allege that Hatfield and GDF were in
On March 26, 2002, the Court entered an order freezing Hatfield and GDF's assets, an order
The SEC requested that the Court find Hatfield and GDF in civil contempt and incarcerate
|