LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JAMES MURPHY, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17538, CourtName: 2002, THE HON. PATTI B. SARIS OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR, Defendant: James Murphy, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17538, Murphy, Securities, Violations, Exchange, Exchange Commission, James Murphy, Former Cfo, Centennial Technologies, Financial Fraud, Exchange Act, United States, Enjoining, Federal Securities Laws, Pay, Civil Penalty, Participation, Announcements, Saris, District, Aiding, Abetting, Complaint, Thereunder, Revenues, Net Income, Inventory, Fixed Assets, Periodic Financial Statements, Complaint Charged Murphy , ContentID: 120253125

Case Documents
1 2002-05-30 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128956
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
VIOLATIONS
EXCHANGE
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
JAMES MURPHY
FORMER CFO
CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES
FINANCIAL FRAUD
EXCHANGE ACT
UNITED STATES
LITIGATION
ENJOINING
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
PAY
CIVIL PENALTY
PARTICIPATION
ANNOUNCEMENTS
SARIS
DISTRICT
AIDING
ABETTING
COMPLAINT
THEREUNDER
REVENUES
NET INCOME
INVENTORY
FIXED ASSETS
PERIODIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPLAINT CHARGED MURPHY
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 17538 / May 30, 2002

   Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1562 / May 30, 2002

   SEC v. James Murphy, et al., Civ. Action No. 00cv11981-PBS (D. Mass.,
   filed September 26, 2000)

   JAMES MURPHY, FORMER CFO OF CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES, ENJOINED FROM
   VIOLATING FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS AND ORDERED TO PAY A CIVIL PENALTY
   OF $150,000 FOR HIS PARTICIPATION IN THE FINANCIAL FRAUD AT COMPANY

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on April 29,
   2002, the Hon. Patti B. Saris of the United States District Court for
   the District of Massachusetts entered a judgment enjoining James
   Murphy, Centennial Technologies, Inc.'s former CFO, from violating and
   aiding and abetting violations of the antifraud, record keeping and
   internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws. Judge
   Saris also barred Murphy for ten years from acting as an officer or
   director of a public company and ordered him to pay a civil penalty of
   $150,000 for his participation in the financial fraud at Centennial.

   The Commission's complaint alleged that between April 1994 and
   December 31, 1996, Murphy and Emanuel Pinez, Centennial's former CEO,
   with the assistance of others, engaged in a fraudulent scheme to
   overstate the value of Centennial's revenues, net income, inventory,
   and fixed assets in public announcements and in periodic financial
   statements filed with the Commission. The complaint charged Murphy
   with violations of §17(a) of the Securities Act, §§10(b) and 13(b)(5)
   of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1, and 13b2-2 thereunder,
   and aiding and abetting Centennial's violations of §§13(a), 13
   (b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20,
   13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder.

   For further information, please see, Litigation Release Nos. , , , , ,
   , , and .
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 05/30/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SEC v. James Murphy, et al., Civ.
  • JAMES MURPHY, FORMER CFO OF CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES, ENJOINED FROM VIOLATING FEDERAL
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on April 29, 2002, the Hon.
  • Patti B. Saris of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered
  • Judge Saris also barred Murphy for ten years from acting as an officer or director of a
  • The Commission's complaint alleged that between April 1994 and December 31, 1996, Murphy and
  • The complaint charged Murphy with violations of §17of the Securities Act, §§10and 13of the
  • For further information, please see, Litigation Release Nos.
  •    |