 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HAINEY INTERNET MARKETING SOLUTIONS SUBPOENAS SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION ROBERT ANDREW HAINEY DISTRICT WASHINGTON LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT STATES DISTRICT COURT COLUMBIA ENFORCE INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENAS TESTIMONY POTENTIALLY MISLEADING DISCLOSURES WEBSITE WALL STREET ALERT ALLEGES COMMISSION ARGUES PARTIES VALID JUSTIFICATION FAILURE |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
Litigation Release No. 17570 / June 17, 2002
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert Andrew Hainey and
Internet Marketing Solutions, Civil Action No. 02 MS 261 (June 13,
2002)
On June 13, 2002, the Commission filed an application with the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia for an order to
enforce investigative subpoenas served on Robert Andrew Hainey and
Internet Marketing Solutions. The subpoenas sought documents and
testimony from Hainey and documents from Internet Marketing Solutions
regarding, among other things, potentially misleading disclosures on
their website, stocktopics.com, and in their e-mail spams entitled
"Wall Street Alert."
The Commission's application alleges that Hainey and Internet
Marketing Solutions have not fully complied with the subpoenas issued
by the Commission. In its application, the Commission argues, among
other things, that these parties have no valid justification for their
failure to comply. A hearing on the Commission's application has not
yet been scheduled
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 06/17/2002
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
