LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v RICHARD S. BERGER Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17622, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: U.S. DISTRICT COURT ISSUES ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE, Defendant: Richard S. Berger, Plaintiff: SEC, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17622, Berger, Subpoena, Enforcement, Piranha, Securities, Enforcement Action, District Court, Motion, Commission, Compliance, Subponea, Texas, Richard, Directing, Violate, Violate Provisions, Federal Securities Laws, Development Stage Company, Data-compression, Internet Related Technology, Common Stock, Otc Bulletin Board, Electronic Quotation Service, National Association, Securities Dealers, Former Cfo, Single Shareholder , ContentID: 120253042

Case Documents
1 2002-07-17 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128873
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
SUBPOENA
ENFORCEMENT
PIRANHA
SECURITIES
ENFORCEMENT ACTION
DISTRICT COURT
MOTION
COMMISSION
COMPLIANCE
SUBPONEA
TEXAS
RICHARD
DIRECTING
VIOLATE
VIOLATE PROVISIONS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY
BUSINESS
DATA-COMPRESSION
INTERNET RELATED TECHNOLOGY
COMMON STOCK
OTC BULLETIN BOARD
ELECTRONIC QUOTATION SERVICE
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
SECURITIES DEALERS
FORMER CFO
SINGLE SHAREHOLDER
MEMBER
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17622 / July 17, 2002

   Misc. Action No. 4-02-MC-008-Y, USDC, NDTX (Fort Worth Division)

           U.S. DISTRICT COURT ISSUES ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE
                     IN SEC SUBPONEA ENFORCEMENT ACTION

   On July 11, 2002, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
   Texas granted the SEC's application for enforcement of an
   investigative subpoena against Richard S. Berger, the former Chief
   Financial Officer for Piranha, Inc. In its order, the Court denied
   motions brought by Berger, including one to prohibit the SEC from
   bringing an enforcement action against Berger for 60 days and another
   to force the SEC to "cooperate" with Berger. The Court ordered Berger
   to produce all responsive documents on or before July 21, 2002.

   In finding that the subpoena was enforceable as written, the Court
   held that Berger failed to demonstrate that the SEC's subpoena was
   issued in bad faith, or was overbroad in scope. The Court also held
   that Berger did not have a "privacy interest" in his personal tax
   returns and that Berger failed to show any circumstances that
   warranted delaying the SEC's investigation.

   The SEC filed its Motion for Immediate Order Directing Compliance with
   Subponea Duces Tecum on April 24, 2002. The subpoena seeks documents
   regarding, among other things, whether Berger, Piranha, or others
   issued false and misleading press releases, overstated the value of
   assets in its SEC filings, understated amortization expenses, and
   failed to disclose over $600,000 in unauthorized payments to Berger.
   The SEC's motion alleges that the subpoenaed documents are needed to
   determine if Berger, Piranha, or others have violated or are about to
   violate provisions of the federal securities laws.

   Piranha is a Richardson, Texas, development stage company in the
   business of data-compression and other computer and Internet related
   technology. Piranha's common stock is registered with the Commission
   and is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (symbol BYTE), an electronic
   quotation service operated by the National Association of Securities
   Dealers. Besides being the former CFO, Berger is Piranha's largest
   single shareholder and a member of its Board of Directors.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 07/18/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. DISTRICT COURT ISSUES ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE
  • IN SEC SUBPONEA ENFORCEMENT ACTION
  • On July 11, 2002, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted the
  • In its order, the Court denied motions brought by Berger, including one to prohibit the SEC
  • In finding that the subpoena was enforceable as written, the Court held that Berger failed to
  • The SEC filed its Motion for Immediate Order Directing Compliance with Subponea Duces Tecum
  • The subpoena seeks documents regarding, among other things, whether Berger, Piranha, or
  • The SEC's motion alleges that the subpoenaed documents are needed to determine if Berger,
  • Piranha is a Richardson, Texas, development stage company in the business of data-compression
  • Piranha's common stock is registered with the Commission and is quoted on the OTC Bulletin
  • Besides being the former CFO, Berger is Piranha's largest single shareholder and a member of
  •    |