LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ARJUN SEKHRI, AMOLAK SEHGAL, PRATIMA RAJAN, FUAD DOW, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17636, CourtCode: CTY, CourtName: INC. IN NEW YORK CITY. BASED ON ITS FINDINGS, THE COURT PERMANENTLY, Defendant: Arjun Sekhri, Amolak Sehgal, Pratima Rajan, Fuad Dow, Gordon W. Cochrane, Martin L. Thifault, Rohina Sharma, and Sharad Kapoor, Defendants, and Mahendar Sekhri And Sharda Sekhri, relief defendants, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17636, Sekhri, Insider Trading, Securities, Investment, Illegal Profits, United States, Exchange Commission, Maximum Civil Penalty, Pay, Southern District, York, Disgorge, Charges, Pratima Rajan, Fuad Dow, Gordon, Cochrane, Martin, Thifault, Rohina Sharma, Sharad Kapoor, Mahendar Sekhri, Announcements, Judgement, Investment Banking, Tippees, India , ContentID: 120253028

Case Documents
1 2002-07-30 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128859
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INSIDER TRADING
SECURITIES
DEFENDANTS
INVESTMENT
ILLEGAL PROFITS
UNITED STATES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION
MAXIMUM CIVIL PENALTY
PAY
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
YORK
COURT
DISGORGE
CHARGES
PRATIMA RAJAN
FUAD DOW
GORDON
COCHRANE
MARTIN
THIFAULT
ROHINA SHARMA
SHARAD KAPOOR
MAHENDAR SEKHRI
ANNOUNCEMENTS
JUDGEMENT
INVESTMENT BANKING
TIPPEES
INDIA
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC

Litigation Release No. 17636 / July 30, 2002

SEC v. Arjun Sekhri, Amolak Sehgal, Pratima Rajan, Fuad Dow, Gordon W.
Cochrane, Martin L. Thifault, Rohina Sharma, and Sharad Kapoor, Defendants,
and Mahendar Sekhri And Sharda Sekhri, relief defendants, Civil Action No.
98 Civ. 2320 (S.D.N.Y.) (RPP)

Former Fugitive Investment Banker Ordered to Pay More than $9 Million for
Insider Trading

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on July 25,
   2002, Judge Robert P. Patterson of the Southern District of New York
   entered a final judgment granting the SEC's motion for summary
   judgment against Arjun Sekhri, 37, an Indian national who formerly
   worked as an investment banking associate at Salomon Smith Barney,
   Inc. in New York City. Based on its findings, the Court permanently
   enjoined Sekhri from future violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3, and
   ordered him to disgorge $957,892.55 in insider trading profits of the
   individuals who traded based upon his tips. The SEC has already
   recovered more than $1.6 million in disgorgement from other
   defendants, and the amount that Sekhri has been ordered to disgorge
   represents the remaining illegal profits that had not yet been
   recovered in this action. Sekhri was also ordered to pay prejudgment
   interest of $376,879.66, and to pay the maximum civil penalty of
   $7,727,772.21, which is three times the total illegal profit of
   $2,575,924.07 made by Sekhri's tippees.

   The Court found that, between September 1997 and January 1998, Sekhri,
   Amolak Sehgal, Pratima Rajan, Fuad Dow, Gordon W. Cochrane, Martin L.
   Thifault, Rohina Sharma, Sharad Kapoor, and Sekhri's father, Mahendar
   Sekhri, engaged in an insider trading scheme in which Sekhr's tips led
   to trades by the individuals purchasing securities of MCI
   Communications Corp., Brooks Fiber Properties, Inc., Carson Pirie
   Scott & Co., Inc., Central and South West Corp., and Southern New
   England Telecommunications Corp., in advance of six merger and
   acquisition announcements involving these companies. Sekhri's repeated
   tips of inside information to his tippees generated illegal profits of
   approximately $2.5 million.

   In January 1998, after learning that the SEC was investigating this
   trading, Sekhri quickly fled the United States and traveled to India
   to avoid prosecution. On April 1, 1998, the SEC charged Sekhri and
   others with insider trading. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the
   Southern District of New York later filed criminal charges against
SNIPPETS:
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  • SEC v. Arjun Sekhri, Amolak Sehgal, Pratima Rajan, Fuad Dow, Gordon W. Cochrane, Martin L.
  • Former Fugitive Investment Banker Ordered to Pay More than $9 Million for Insider Trading
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on July 25, 2002, Judge Robert P.
  • Based on its findings, the Court permanently enjoined Sekhri from future violations of
  • The SEC has already recovered more than $1.6 million in disgorgement from other defendants,
  • The Court found that, between September 1997 and January 1998, Sekhri, Amolak Sehgal, Pratima tions Corp., in advance of six merger and acquisition announcements involving these companies.
  • Sekhri's repeated tips of inside information to his tippees generated illegal profits of
  • In January 1998, after learning that the SEC was investigating this trading, Sekhri quickly
  • The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York later filed criminal charges
  • In imposing the maximum civil penalty allowable, the Court observed that Sekhri "held one of
  • The SEC's litigation in this case continues against the remaining defendants.
  •    |