LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SCOTT S. FRASER and SPARKLIST.COM Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17639, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: APPLICATION IN FEDERAL COURT IN LOS ANGELES SEEKING AN ORDER DIRECTING, Defendant: Scott S. Fraser and SparkLIST.com, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17639, Fraser, Commission, Securities, Investment, Subpoenas, Exchange Commission, Scott, Newsletter, Natural Contrarian, Internet, E-mails, Subscribers, Seeking, Recommends, Stock, Violations, Antifraud, Investment Adviser Registration, Adviser Registration Provisions, Federal Securities Laws, Valid Justification, Failure, Federal Court, Los Angeles Seeking, Order Directing Fraser, Purchase, Sale, Multi-millionaires, Oil, Gas , ContentID: 120253025

Case Documents
1 2002-07-30 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128856
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
SECURITIES
INVESTMENT
SUBPOENAS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SCOTT
NEWSLETTER
NATURAL CONTRARIAN
INTERNET
E-MAILS
SUBSCRIBERS
SEEKING
RECOMMENDS
STOCK
VIOLATIONS
ANTIFRAUD
INVESTMENT ADVISER REGISTRATION
ADVISER REGISTRATION PROVISIONS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
VALID JUSTIFICATION
FAILURE
FEDERAL COURT
LOS ANGELES SEEKING
ORDER DIRECTING FRASER
PURCHASE
SALE
MULTI-MILLIONAIRES
OIL
GAS
Securities and Exchange Commission

Litigation Release No. 17639 / July 30, 2002

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SCOTT S. FRASER AND SPARKLIST.COM,
Civil Action No. 02-05485 GAF (PLAx) (C.D. Cal.)

   On July 29, 2002, United States District Judge Gary A. Feess ruled
   that Scott S. Fraser and SparkLIST.com must comply with investigative
   subpoenas issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Fraser, of
   San Diego, California, publishes a monthly investment newsletter
   called The Natural Contrarian and operates an internet website called
   ScottFraser.com. Sparklist, based in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is an
   internet related company that sends e-mails messages for businesses
   who wish to outsource their email newsletter. Sparklist was paid by
   Fraser to send e-mails to the public about Fraser's and his
   subscribers' investment success.

   On May 13, 2001 and May 21, 2001, the Commission issued subpoenas to
   Fraser and Sparklist seeking documents relating to Fraser's possible
   violations of the antifraud and investment adviser registration
   provisions of the federal securities laws. After Fraser and Sparklist
   failed to comply with the subpoenas and did not provide any valid
   justification for their failure to comply, the Commission filed an
   application in federal court in Los Angeles seeking an order directing
   Fraser and Sparklist to comply with the subpoenas.

   The Commission's application alleged that Fraser recommends the
   purchase and sale of securities in The Natural Contrarian and through
   ScottFraser.com. The Commission is investigating whether Fraser has
   falsely claimed that he has "turned over 1,170 of (his) subscribers
   into MULTI-MILLIONAIRES," that his "oil and gas (stock) picks have
   yielded over 1,805% combined returns," and that "over 87% . . . (of
   his) stock recommendations . . . have increased on average 135% in the
   past 28 months."

     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 07/31/2002
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SCOTT S. FRASER AND SPARKLIST.COM, Civil Action No.
  • On July 29, 2002, United States District Judge Gary A. Feess ruled that Scott S. Fraser and
  • Fraser, of San Diego, California, publishes a monthly investment newsletter called The
  • Sparklist, based in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is an internet related company that sends e-mails
  • On May 13, 2001 and May 21, 2001, the Commission issued subpoenas to Fraser and Sparklist
  • After Fraser and Sparklist failed to comply with the subpoenas and did not provide any valid
  • The Commission's application alleged that Fraser recommends the purchase and sale of
  • The Commission is investigating whether Fraser has falsely claimed that he has "turned over
  •    |