LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MICHAEL A NEWDOW v US CONGRESS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: MANVUC150514, CourtName: MISC 3, Plaintiff: MICHAEL A NEWDOW, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>MANVUC150514, School, United States, School District, Government, Newdow, Pledge, Justice, California, School District Defendants, Judge, Opinion, God, President, Establishment Clause, Religion, Constitution, First Amendment, Endorsement, Supreme Court, Public School, Lemon Test, Recitation, Fernandez, Concurring, Allegiance, Establishment Clause Violation, Egusd, Sacramento , ContentID: 120252958

Case Documents
1   OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128757
25 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 25 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SCHOOL
UNITED STATES
SCHOOL DISTRICT
GOVERNMENT
NEWDOW
PLEDGE
JUSTICE
CALIFORNIA
SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS
JUDGE
OPINION
GOD
PRESIDENT
ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
RELIGION
CONSTITUTION
FIRST AMENDMENT
ENDORSEMENT
SUPREME COURT
PUBLIC SCHOOL
LEMON TEST
PLAINTIFF
RECITATION
FERNANDEZ
CONCURRING
ALLEGIANCE
ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE VIOLATION
EGUSD
SACRAMENTO
                  FOR PUBLICATION

     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT


MICHAEL A. NEWDOW,
                Plaintiff-Appellant,

                 v.

US CONGRESS; UNITED STATES OF                  No. 00-16423
AMERICA; WILLIAM JEFFERSON                       D.C. No.
CLINTON, President of the United
States; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ELK         CV-00-00495-
                                                MLS/PAN
GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT;
DAVID W. GORDON, Superintendent                 OPINION
EGUSD; SACRAMENTO CITY
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; JIM
SWEENEY, Superintendent SCUSD,
             Defendants-Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court
            for the Eastern District of California
        Edward J. Schwartz, Senior Judge, Presiding

                       Argued and Submitted
         March 14, 2002--San Francisco, California

                        Filed June 26, 2002

      Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Stephen Reinhardt and
           Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Circuit Judges

                Opinion by Judge Goodwin,
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Fernandez





                               9105


                    NEWDOW v. U.S. CONGRESS              9109



SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
  • EGUSD; SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; JIM
  • March 14, 2002--San Francisco, California
  • Opinion by Judge Goodwin,
  • Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Fernandez
  • Michael Newdow, Pro Se, Sacramento, California, the plaintiff-appellant.
  • Newdow argues that the addition of these words by a 1954 federal statute to the previous
  • In accordance with state law and a school district rule, EGUSD teachers begin each school day
  • On June 22, 1942, Congress first codified the Pledge as "I pledge allegiance to the flag of
  • The school districts and their superintendents (collectively, "school district defendants")
  • The United States Congress, the United States, and the President of the United States joined
  • The Supreme Court found that the plaintiff had standing neither as a taxpayer,
  • While Valley Forge remains good law, the Supreme Court in more recent opinions has indirectly
  • at 314 ), the Court held that the "mere passage by the District of a policy that has the
  • Justice O'Connor's concurrence in Wallace noted that whether a statute actually conveys a
  • 472 U.S. at 76 (O'Connor, J., concurring in judgment).
  • To survive the "Lemon test," the government conduct in question must have a secular purpose,
  •    |