LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MATT BRODY and JOHN BRAUN v OMNICOM GROUP INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: MBAJBVOGI224027, CourtName: MISC 3, Plaintiff: MATT BRODY and JOHN BRAUN, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>MBAJBVOGI224027, Omnicom, Securities, Exchange Act, Class Period, Reports, Misleading, Worldwide Revenue, Action Pursuant, Inflated Prices, Individual Defendants, Seneca, Investments, Period Ending, Common Stock, Communications, Materially False, Market Price, Net Income, Acquisitions, Commission, Management, Relevant Times, Dissemination, Weisenburger, Participation, Misrepresentations , ContentID: 120252956

Case Documents
1 2000-04-25 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128755
26 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 26 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT
CLASS PERIOD
DEFENDANTS
REPORTS
MEMBERS
PLAINTIFFS
MISLEADING
WORLDWIDE REVENUE
ACTION PURSUANT
INFLATED PRICES
BUSINESS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
SENECA
INVESTMENTS
PERIOD ENDING
COMMON STOCK
COMMUNICATIONS
MATERIALLY FALSE
MARKET PRICE
NET INCOME
ACQUISITIONS
COMMISSION
MANAGEMENT
RELEVANT TIMES
DISSEMINATION
WEISENBURGER
PARTICIPATION
MISREPRESENTATIONS
                                          UNlITED  STA
                                        SOLrl'HERN       L)W%`RICT"OF  NEW  Y,ORK





                           Plai&if~s  have  alleged kc  following  based upon Lht: investigation 





and qotis,  securities analysts' rcposrs astJ advisories about the Company, press roleuscs anki

other public  sfatenxmrs issued by the C;`ompany; and m;edia reports about the Cnmpan3;: and



forth  hercin ~ter  a rewmahle  opportunity  for  di~avery.



               1.         This: ie a ferkrnl  class actiuil  on behalf cf purchastis  of the

Ornnico~r~            tchvccn  April  25,ZOOO and June 11,20X,  inclusive (she "tY%x~ Pcrioc!");

pumc  remedies under the SccWies  Exchange  Act  of 1934 (the "Excharlgt  Act").


,


                                         .,s.       .

                                                  J-G-R.mICTION           AND  VENUE

               3
               a...     The cI&ns  asserted herein arise under and pursuant to Sections 10(b) and

       the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C.  @ 7'8j@) and 78t(a)]  and Rule lob-5 promulgated thereunder I

       the Securities and Exchange Commission  ("SEC")  117 C.F.R. 5 24-O.
                                                                                         lob-51.

               3.       This Court has jurisdiction  over the subject matter of this action

       U-SC.  $3 1331 and 1337 and SectionZ7,ofthe  Exchange Act  [15 U.S.C. $78aa].

SNIPPETS:
  • other public sfatenxmrs issued by the C;`ompany; and m;edia reports about the Cnmpan3;:
  • pumc remedies under the SccWies Exchange Act of 1934.
  • the Securities and Exchange Commission 117 C.F.R. 5 24-O.
  • limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of the national
  • purchased the common stock of Omnicom at artificially
  • inflated prices during the Class Period and has beien damaged thereby.
  • business located at 437 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022.
  • Defendants Wren, WeisenburBer, Crawford and Angelash are collectiv
  • connections wirh other corporate officers and employees, attendance at management and Bc
  • It is appropriate to treat the Individual Defendants as a group for pleading
  • reviewing and/or disseminating the false and misleading statements and information alleget
  • disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse
  • other members of the Class to purchase Chnnicorn securities at artificially inflated prices.
  • Plaintiffs bring this action as a class action pursuant to FederaI Ruie of Civil
  • fendants, the officers and directors of the Company, at all relevant times, members of their i
  • Onmicom's growth was attributed, for the most part, to the numerous acquisitions made by
  • investments to $eneca, which had been jointly created with Pegasus Capital LLP in May 200
  • Seneca had bezn created as a vehicle for the Company to avoid repc
  • quarter of 2000, the period ending March 3 1,200O.
  • million in the third quarter of 1999, The Company also reported that worldwide revenue
  • The Company reported that net income for the fouflh quarter of 2000 increased 19% to $14:
  • Wren, Weisenburger, Crav&ord and Angel&o, among others, conKrmed the previouslyannounced
  • relying upon the integrity of the market price of Omnicom's secti tics and market inforrnati
  • the material misrepresentations and omissions particuh
  • in the issuance or dissemination of such statements or documents as primary violations of th
  • positions, and their ownership and contractual rights, participation in and/or awareness of
  •    |