UNITED STKJXS DISTRICT' COURT m&
EASTERN DISTRICT OF h4lSSOUFU
EASTERN DIVISION
Plaintiff,
> Cause No.
V. \
.i JURY TRvIAL DEMANDED
AMDOCS LIMTED, BRUCE k. ANDERSOh:, >
ROBERT PI. MXNUCCI, AVINNM NAO'K, )
and DOVBtiWY,
Defendants. >
-1
PLAMTLFF'S CLASS ACTION CBMPLAJMT
Plaintiff makes the following allegations upon Mormati,on and belief, except as to
allegations speci.fica.Uy pertking to pl.aintiff aud his counsel, based on tie facts alleged
which are predicated upon the investigation undertaken by plaintiff's counsel, whose
investigation included analysis ofpublicly-availsble news articles and reports, public filings,
press releases and otbzr matters oFpublic record. Plaintiffbelieves that further substantial
evidentiary support will exist far the allegations set: forth below after a reasonable opportunity
for discovery,
NATUREO%THEACTION
1. This is a class action on behalf of all purclxtsers of the common stock of Amdocs
Limircd ("Amdocs" or the "`Company") between July 18,,2000, and June 20,2002, inclusive,
(the "Class Period"), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 &he
"Exchange Act").
2. During the Class Period, defendants issued a series of press releases touting
tZompany's "record" finaucinl resu,lts, and continued revenu,e growth despite deteriorating
SNIPPETS:
Plaintiff makes the following allegations upon Mormati,on and belief, except as to
Limircd ("Amdocs" or the "`Company") between July 18,,2000, and June 20,2002, inclusive,
seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 &he
defendants issued a series of press releases touting the
tZompany's "record" finaucinl resu,lts, and continued revenu,e growth despite deteriorating
market conditions.
Class Period at artiI!icially inflated prices, Amdocs's business and financizil condition were
mar~fp~ace that tvhiIe market conditions were tough,
loser in percentage terms on tie New York Stock Exchange.
1337 and 1367 and Section 27 ofthe Exchange Act.
of business that operated as a fraud or deceit on purchasers of Amdocs common stock,
dissemin.ating materially false and misleading;
Excluded from the Class are defendants, members of the immediate family of each of the
A class action is superior to all other available methods for the ftir and efficient
Arndocs Limited today reported that for the third quarter ended June 30,2000, revenue reached
The acquisition-related charges derive prim.arily from the acquisition of Salect Technology
These charges include wrire-off of purchased in-process research and development,
As a resuk of the acquisition-related charges, the Company's as-reported results showed a net
As the world's leader in customer care and billing systems, Amdocs is uniquely positioned to
The Company's as-reported net income, which includes acquisition-rel,ated charges of
"leading CRM vendor" for $200 million.
As a result of these materially false and misl.eading statements and failers
and in public reports abouT and press releases issued by the Company were false products
|
