LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORP v ARTHUR ANDERSEN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: HCCVAA206490, CourtCode: SM, CourtName: DALLAS SUPREME COURT, Plaintiff: HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORP, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>HCCVAA206490, Tax, Hcc, Spin-off, Hollywood, Intercompany Debt, Stock, Subsidiaries, Hcc Group, Income, Phc, Greate Bay, Basis, Gain, Transactions, Income Tax, Ela, Accounting, Consolidation, Stockholders, Loss, Ppi Funding Debt, Committee, Deemed Satisfaction, Damages, Reissuance, Advice, Nols, Phc Subgroup, Federal Income, Amount, Irs, Ela Triggering, Connection, Tax Consequences, Federal Income Tax, Recover, Excess Loss Account, Taxation, Regulations, Gbcc Group, Capital Contribution, Profession , ContentID: 120252879

Case Documents
1   EXP REP-WHEELER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128609
21 pages
PDF
2   CSE COVER SHEET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128607
3 pages
PDF
3   Government Exhibit # 2ND AMENDED PETITION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128606
24 pages
PDF
4 2100-03-23 EXP REP.-RHWELLEN
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128608
29 pages
PDF
5 1994-10 NOTE OF SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 128610
2 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 79 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . EXP REP-WHEELER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INCOME TAX
ACCOUNTING
COMMITTEE
CONSOLIDATION
IRS
FEDERAL INCOME
TAXATION
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
SUBSIDIARIES
WASHINGTON
PROFESSION
MEMBER
MEASUREMENT
TAXPAYER
DEFERRED GAINS
AICPA
ELAS
HCC
EXPERT WITNESS
EXCESS LOSS ACCOUNTS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DISCLOSURES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CPA
JOINT COMMITTEE
ADVANCED FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
RETIREMENT
BOWLING GREEN STATE
INVESTMENT
                AN  ANALYSIS  OF  ACCOUNTING           THEORY  AND  ISSUES  INVOLVED         IN
                            CONSOLIDATED         FINANCIAL      STATEMENTS     AND
                                CONSOLIDATED        INCOME  TAX  RETURNS

                                          BY  JAMES  E. WHEELER

                                            part  I:  Introductioq

A.      Professor  Wheeler's  backmound.

        I  taught  accounting  at the  University  of  Michigan  for  approximately  26  years

formal  retirement  in  1998.  I  currently  teach  a course  in  advanced  financial  accounting 

emphasis on consolidations)  as a visiting  professor  at the University  of  Hawaii.  I  am  also 

author  of  a textbook  entitled  Advanced  Financial  Accounting;.

        I  have  testified  in  a significant  number  of  major  federal  income  tax  cases on

the Internal  Revenue  Service  (IRS)  as well  as on  behalf  of  taxpayers.  I  spent a year  as

in residence  with  the  IRS  in  Washington,  D.C.  while  on  leave  from  the University  of 

had previously  spent one year  on  the  staff  of  the Joint  Committee  on  Taxation  of  the

where  I  did  the  first  study  on  the  measurement  or  estimation  of  corporate  tax 

disclosures  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  In  addition,  I performed  an

House  Ways  and Means  Committee  of  the  106 individual  taxpayer  returns  for  fiscal year 

adjusted  gross income  exceed  $200,000  and  whose  tax  payments  were  zero.  I  have  also 

before  various  House  Ways  and  Means  Subcommittees  of  the U.S.  Congress.

         I  have  been  an  active  member  of  the  American  Institute  of  Certified  Public 

 (AICPA)  and  other  professional  organizations,  My  committee  assignments  for  the 

Division  of  the  AICPA  included  being  on  the  Board  of  Examiners  for  the  CPA 

 service  on  the Accounting  Theory  Subcommittee  for  the  CPA  examination.  In  the  AICPA's 

                                                          1


Division,  I  have  served  on  various  subcommittees  and  on  the  Executive  Committee  of  the

SNIPPETS:
  • I taught accounting at the University of Michigan for approximately 26 years before my
  • formal retirement in 1998.
  • author of a textbook entitled Advanced Financial Accounting;.
  • I have testified in a significant number of major federal income tax cases on behalf of both
  • the Internal Revenue Service as well as on behalf of taxpayers.
  • in residence with the IRS in Washington, D.C. while on leave from the University of Michigan.
  • had previously spent one year on the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation of the U.S.
  • House Ways and Means Committee of the 106 individual taxpayer returns for fiscal year 1970
  • I have been an active member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
  • (AICPA)
  • service on the Accounting Theory Subcommittee for the CPA examination.
  • Andersen gave to HCC, I have reviewed professional literature concerning the correct
  • theory for both consolidated financial statements as well as for consolidated income tax
  • disclosures regarding income tax reporting required, by the Securities and Exchange Commission
  • consolidation consists of forming a single economic entity from the
  • Leaving the group triggers all of the as-yet unrestored deferred gains and losses whenever
  • substituted for the parent's investment in the subsidiary account.
  • measurement of the basis for any corporation leaving the consolidated tax return group.
  • only be done accurately as of the date the subsidiary and any lower tier subsidiaries leave
  • adverse tax consequences existed from the income that would be created by triggering ELAs.
  • It will also then trigger all excess loss accounts
  • reasonably competent members of the accounting profession would have exercised under similar
  • Dean's Honor List, Bowling Green State University, each semester 1955 -1958 Cum laude
  • This is the highest award a tax professor can achieve within the American Taxation
  • Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation U.S. Congress.
  • Expert witness for the IRS in the Eli Lilly case, September 198 1 in the Tax Court in

  • 2 . CSE COVER SHEET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MEMORANDUM
    COUNTY
    COURT
    
     FILE  DATE'"          -Ox  -a                                COST       DEPOSIT        $  \QO-    
     BOND  APPROVAL                                      DATE                                     
                                                                                                       
     CONSOLIDATED              WITH                                                      TRANSFERRED   
     SEVERED          FROM                                                                      DATE
    
                                 I                                                                     
      3ATE       FILED                         PLEADINGS/ORDERS/PROCESS                                
    
    
    
    
    
    I  AND  MUST  NOT  BE REMOVED
           FROM        THE  DISTRICT        CLERK'S        OFFICE
    
     BILL  LONG,DISTRICT                CLERKBDALLAS              COUNTY
    
    
                                  .-
    
    
    M&lORANfl"lVl  OF PAPERS FILED CONTINUED
                         -++
                           6:
    
    
    --.     -.? 98- 7822 COURT OF *R,cT
                                                                                                  
    
    
    
    
    
            FILE  DATE                                    COST  DEPOSIT  $                             
            BOND  APPROVAL                          DATE                             INITIAL     
    
    
            CONSOLIDATED        WITH                                        TRANSFERRED           FROM
            SEVERED  FROM                                                       .  DATE
                                                                                                       
    
                                  I                                                                   h
                                  I            PLEADINGS/ORDERS/PROCESS               ISSUED,         '
    
                                                             d     A&+-
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • 98- 7822 COURT OF *R,cT
  • DISTRICT CLERK,DALLAS COUNTY
  • MEMORANDUM OF PAPERS FILED CQNTINUED

  • 3 . Government Exhibit # 2ND AMENDED PETITION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    GREATE BAY
    DEFENDANTS
    SUBSIDIARIES
    PLAINTIFFS
    DAMAGES
    ADVICE
    AMOUNT
    CONNECTION
    TAX
    INCOME
    SPIN-OFF
    RECOVER
    LIABILITY
    NEGLIGENT
    CONTRACT
    FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
    SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
    FEDERAL INCOME
    ELAS
    GREATE BAY CASINO
    OUTSTANDING DEBTS
    CONSOLIDATION
    PRIOR ERRORS
    DALLAS COUNTY
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    DECONSOLIDATION
    IRS REGULATIONS
    TIME DEFENDANTS
    PROFESSION
    
     HOLLYWOOD                 CASINO  CORP                                                      T 
     and  GREATE  BAY  CASINO
     CORPORATION,
    
                                     Plaintiffs,
    
    V.                                                                             LAS  COUNTY,  T  E X
    
    ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  L.L.P.,  RICHARD                              6
     L.  ROBBINS,  MICHAEL                E. GAMACHE,               6
     DANIEL  J. MEEHAN,  and  BRENT  R.                             6        $URY  TRIAL  REOUESTED
     IWLSBACK,                                                      0
    
                                     Defendants.                    §        1 93RD JUDICIAL    
    
    
                                    l?LAINTIFFS'         SECOND  AMENDED  PETITION
    
                     TO  THE  HONOWLE                JUDGE  OF  SAID  COURT:
    
                     Hollywood  Casino  Corporation  ("Hollywood")        and Greate  Bay  Casino 
    
    Bay"),  plaintiffs,  file  this  their  Second  Amended  Petition  against  Arthur  Andersen 
    
    L.  Robbins,  Michael  E. Gamache,  Daniel  J. Meehan,  and  Brent  R. Railsback  (collectively 
    
    Andersen"),  defendants.  This  is an action  to  recover  millions  of  dollars  in  damages 
    
    Hollywood  and  Greate  Bay  because of  Arthur  Andersen's  negligent  advice  and  breach  of 
    
    concerning  the advice  given,  work  performed,  and amounts charged  in  connection  with 
    
    taxable  spin  off  of  certain  subsidiaries  (the  "Spin-Off").
    
                                                             The Parties
    
                     1.     Plaintiff  Hollywood  Casino  Corporation  is a Delaware  corporation  with
    
    place  of  business  in  Dallas  County,  Texas.
    
    
    
    
    
    PLAINTIFFS'  SECOND  AMJXNDED PETITION  -  Page 1
    
    73991/06929.005096
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Bay"), plaintiffs, file this their Second Amended Petition against Arthur Andersen L.L,P.,
  • This is an action to recover millions of dollars in damages suffered by both
  • Hollywood and Greate Bay because of Arthur Andersen's negligent advice and breach of contract
  • Plaintiff Greate Bay Casino Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal
  • Defendant Arthur Andersen L.L.P. is a limited liability partnership of certified public
  • amount in controversy exceeds the minimum jurisdictional amount of this Court,
  • This Court has both general and specific personal jurisdiction over all defendants
  • claims occurred in Dallas County, because Arthur Andersen has a principal offrce in Dallas
  • Enancial statements for a number of years, reviewed and signed its consolidated tax return
  • Hollywood decided to spin off a consolidated group of subsidiary companies
  • subsidiaries) were part of the consolidated accounting and tax entities within Hollywood.
  • implications of such studies in connection with the proposed Spin-Off.
  • proposed transaction would create no more than $15 million in taxable income to Hollywood.
  • As long as the unprofitable members remain consolidated, these ELAs do not pose
  • ending December 3 1, 1996, it severely underpaid its federal income taxes.
  • clients about all applicable tax laws and IRS regulations concerning the work it was
  • Hollywood's and Greate Bay's financial statements are not correctly
  • to accrue past the time Defendants should have recognized their prior errors.
  • requirement that all outstanding debts of subsidiary companies involved in the
  • Andersen knew or should have known, through the exercise of due care, that all outstanding
  • Andersen failed to live up to its own standards or the standards of its profession.
  • and prudence in providing tax and consolidation advice to Hollywood and Greate Bay in that it

  • 4 . EXP REP.-RHWELLEN

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    TAX
    SPIN-OFF
    INTERCOMPANY DEBT
    STOCK
    MEMBERS
    HCC GROUP
    PHC
    INCOME
    BASIS
    GAIN
    TRANSACTIONS
    ELA
    SUBSIDIARIES
    STOCKHOLDERS
    LOSS
    PPI FUNDING DEBT
    DEEMED SATISFACTION
    REISSUANCE
    NOLS
    PHC SUBGROUP
    ELA TRIGGERING
    TAX CONSEQUENCES
    FEDERAL INCOME TAX
    EXCESS LOSS ACCOUNT
    REGULATIONS
    GBCC GROUP
    CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION
    WRITTEN MATERIALS
    DEPOSITIONS
    
             RISPORT  OF
    
        ROBERT  H.  WELLEN
    
    IVINS,  PHILLIPS     &  BARKER
    
        WASHINGTON,         D.C.
    
    
    
    
    
                                       March  23,200O
    
    
                                                                     REPORT  OF
                                                             ROBERT  H.  WELLEN
                                                      IVINS,  PHILLIPS  &  BARKER
                                                              WASHINGTON,                   D.C.
    
                                                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
    
    
    Introduction.. 
    
    I.        Subject  of  This  Report 
            A.  Excess Loss Account  ("ELA")  in  Stock of  Subsidiary 
            B.  Deemed  Satisfaction  and Reissuance  of  Intercompany  Debt 
    II.       Information  Sources for  This  Report 
            A.  Written  Materials 
            B.  Depositions  and Reports 
            C.  Discussions  . _
                                     .
    ... 4
            D.  L.egal Research
    III.  Facts
    
            A.  HCC  and  Its  Subsidiaries 
                  1.  HCC  and  the Sands
    
       5
                 2.  The  PHC  Subgroup 
    
       5
                 3.  Basis  and Excess Loss Accounts  ("ELAs")  in  Stock  of  PHC  Subgroup
                       Members 
    
       .
                 4.  Intercompany  Debt..
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Excess Loss Account in Stock of Subsidiary
  • B. Deemed Satisfaction and Reissuance of Intercompany Debt
  • HCC and the Sands
  • Basis and Excess Loss Accounts in Stock of PHC Subgroup
  • Members
  • The Capital Contribution and the Spin-off
  • E. Summary of Expected Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-off..
  • Use of GBCC Group Losses to Offset Taxable Income of Other HCC Group
  • 13 A. Consolidated Return Regulations in General..
  • Impact of ELA Triggering on the HCC Stockholders
  • Transactions; Standard of Practice
  • Deemed Satisfaction and Reissuance of the PPI Funding Debt
  • On a regular basis in my practice, I work closely with tax lawyers and accountants from major
  • PHC itself had numerous direct and indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries.
  • PHC and its subsidiaries have made up a separate group (the "GBCC Group") filing its own
  • Written Materials
  • Depositions and Reports
  • These ELAs arose largely due to distributions of borrowed funds and NOLs incurred by the ELA
  • A4 and H&B advised HCC that a spin-off of PCC would "trigger" this ELA -- i.e., cause it to
  • Such a capital contribution would reduce the ELA.'

  • 5 . NOTE OF SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    TRIAL SETTING
    AGREEMENT
    LAWRENCE VINCENT
    SINCERELI
    RHAN
    PETITION
    REASON
    DISMISSAL PAPERS
    SURROUNDING
    READINESS
    ANNOUNCEMENTS
    LIEU
    SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS
    LANGTIAGC
    CONFIDENTIAL AMOUNT
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS
    PAYMENT
    ONE-TIME
    MATTER
    PARTIES
    COURTESIES
    MIKE
    JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    ANDERSON
    TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    SUITE
    
    --
    
                                                                                                       
    ERNANDEZ
                                       Received     09/06/21
           SEP-06-2000               16:39                           34:38PM       in  01:20     on 
                                                                 ~-rui-lM  RUSTIN  TEXQS  USA          
                                                                                                       
    976                    P.02
    
    
    
    
    
               E.  Larry     Vincent,  Jr.                                                             
    fax (214)  6550852
            dir&k  dial  (214)  7~1907                                                                 
    Sodfrey.com
    
    
                  September  6,ZOOO
    
                  John  J. McKetia
                  Graves,  Daugherty,  Hearon  & Moody,  P.C.                                          
                  5 15 Congress, Suite 2300
                  Austin,  Texas 78701
    
                   Re:Cause                No.  DV98-07822;                      Hollywood          
    rthur
                  Anderson  L.L.P.,  et  al.;  In  the  193ti  Judicial  District  Court
    
                  Dear  Mike;
    
                                Thank  you  for  your  courtesies in  agreeing  to note  our 
                  the  ~ou,&s  record.  As  we  have  agreed,  the  parties  have  settIed  this 
                  payment  by  Defendants  to  Plaintiffs  in  a  confidential  amount.  Because  wc 
                  working  out  the  langtiagc  of  the settlement  documents,  we  have  agreed  to 
                  this agreement  in  lieu  of  m&&g  our  respective  announcements regarding 
                   ask that the current  trial  setting be postponed.  As soon as all matters
                   are  conch&d,  we  will  inform  the  court  that  the  action  has  been  settled 
                   dismissal  papers will  be filed.  Should  the  settlement  for  any reason  not  be
                   agree to petition  the court for  a trial  setting no  later rhan January 2001.  If 
                   our  agreement, please sign below  and I  will  file  this  as a Rule  11 agreement
    
                   Sincereli,
    
    
                  E. Lawrence  Vincent,  Jr.
                  L 402203vlnuS096
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • 15 Congress, Suite 2300
  • Austin, Texas 78701
  • Anderson L.L.P., et al.; In the 193ti Judicial District Court
  • Dear Mike;
  • Thank you for your courtesies in agreeing to note our settlement of the above a&ion for
  • the parties have settIed this matter for a one-time
  • payment by Defendants to Plaintiffs in a confidential amount.
  • working out the langtiagc of the settlement documents, we have agreed to inform the court of
  • this agreement in lieu of m&&g our respective announcements regarding readiness for trial,
  • As soon as all matters surrounding the settlement
  • dismissal papers will be filed.
  • Should the settlement for any reason not be consummated,
  • agree to petition the court for a trial setting no later rhan January 2001.
  • our agreement, please sign below and I will file this as a Rule 11 agreement with the court.
  • Sincereli,
  • E. Lawrence Vincent, Jr.
  •    |