 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HCR BAKER EAGLE BUTTE FORT YATES HWY HUGO RR1 STAR ROUTE LAKE HARLEM MANDAREE CHARLES WHITE HORSE ESTATE DUCHENEAUX DUNN FOX DEL BONITA STAR LAPLANT BROWNING LAWRENCE LIND JAMES BANKS MCLAUGHLIN BRUGH CITY RONALD COLONY |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George B. Keepseagle :
P.O. Box 509
Fort Yates, ND 58538-0509 :
and :
Luther Crasco :
HC 63 Box 5040
Dodson, MT 59524 :
and :
John Fredericks : Case Number: 1:99CV03119
P.O. Box 509
Halliday, ND 58636 : Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
and :
FIFTH AMENDED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT
Gene Cadotte :
P.O. Box 200 (Containing 838 Plaintiffs)
McLaughlin, SD 57642 :
and :
Basil Alkire :
Star Route Box 129
Fort Yates, ND 58538 :
and :
Keith and Claryca Mandan :
P.O. 70
New Town, ND 58763 :
and :
ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND :
ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO :
THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUAL
PLAINTIFFS: :
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT REPRESENTATIVES CLASS CERTIFICATION PROPOSED ORDER CIVIL DISCRIMINATION USDA DEFENDANT COMPLAINTS MOTION PURSUANT COUNSEL CIV CLASS MEMBERS SUB-CLASSES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES FARM PROGRAMS CIVIL RIGHTS INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TIME PERIOD MEMORANDUM OPINION NATIVE AMERICAN DECLARATORY ADMINISTRATION CLASS DEFINITION COMMON QUESTIONS SUBCLASSES HYBRID CLASS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GEORGE P. KEEPSEAGLE, et al.,
Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 99-03119
(EGS) [17] [127]
v. FILED
ANN VENEMAN,
Defendant.
DEC 1 2 2001
NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the Court is plaintiffs' motion for class
certification. The Court has considered plaintiffs' motion and
proposed order, defendant·s opposition, and plaintiffs' reply
thereto, all pertinent portions of the record, counsels'
representations at oral argument on July 13, 2001, and the
relevant statutory and case law. Plaintiffs have fulfilled all
the requirements to justify class certification of this action.
Accordingly, on September 28, 2001, the Court granted
plaintiffs' motion for class certification pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 23(b)(2). This Memorandum Opinion and Order sets for the
justification for the Court's September 28, 2001 Order, further
orders plaintiffs to file a proposed order outlining appropriate
sub-classes in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion, and
denies defendant's motion for a stay of the Court's September
28, 2001 Order.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
