LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CFTC v MARK WEINBERG Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CVMW98530, CourtName: MISC 2, Plaintiff: CFTC, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CVMW98530, Act, Commission, Violation, Commodity Futures, Trading, Weinberg, Regulations, Practices, Investors, Contracts, Pursuant, Provisions, Engaging, Commodity Futures Trades, Purported Profits, Merrill Lynch, Practice Constituting, Original Investments, Pool Participants, Asset, Connection, Representations, Paragraphs, California, Commodity Exchange Act, Action Pursuant, Authorizes, Order Thereunder, Federal Rules, Civil Procedure, Account, Pro Hat Vice, Calif, Bar, Glaser, Esq, Restraining , ContentID: 120252669

Case Documents
1   ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127729
12 pages
PDF
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127728
11 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 23 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ASSET
FEDERAL RULES
CIVIL PROCEDURE
COURT
ACCOUNT
PRO HAT VICE
CALIF
BAR
PLAINTIFF
COMMISSION
ACT
GLASER
ESQ
PURSUANT
RESTRAINING
BUSINESS
DEPOSIT
TELECOPIER
DUNFEE
JOHN BARRETT
TRAEGER
COMMODITY
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIORI
MATERIALS
COUNSEL
WEINBERG
RELIEF
ASSIGNMENT
CONSISTENT
      Jan*  I.  1996  738AM                                                                        
      .  .
      .
                        .



              1     ti&aT  Glaser, Esq. (Pro Hat  Vice)
                    `oh  Dunfee, Esq. (Pro Hat  Vice)
             2      155 21st Street, N.W.
             3      Kashington, D.C.  2058 1
                    !02-418-5358 (Glaser)
             4      !02-4 18-5396 (Dunfee)
                    !02-4 18-553 1 (fax)                                          .
              5
              6     3ernard John Barrett (Calif.  Bar. No.  165869)
                    ,ouis Traeger (Calif.  Bar No. 38714)
              7
             '      vhrdock  Plaza                                                      .  ,       
                    0900 Wilshire  Boulevard                                     `.             .
              s     iuite 400
              9     aos Angeles,  CA
                    11 O-443-4700                             DUPLICATE
       10           i 1 O-443-4745 (fax>

       41           +Jne$jzi&\  Plaintiff
            11      X@n~~                       @ures  Trading Commission
                                    2%  '
                            c-$  Q:.
       45                            e--b-
                                     0 u') I
                                      ---  ,
                       PJ  c.  *t
                                            Cd
            iii                       .,i -
                            <-'  j  -2 i                       UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
            1;              --         $5  i
                      @Sk[
                             %  LLI
                                             is ::     FOR  THE  CENTRAL  DISTRICT  OF  CALIFORNIA
                                            7:  m                                                  
.&
            16       Commodity  Futures Trading Commission,                                        
                    TN J  f@
            17                                                                                     
                                %
                                                                 Plaintiff,                        
                        `-            _
            18                                                                                     
SNIPPETS:
  • ti&aT Glaser, Esq.
  • (Pro Hat Vice)
  • `oh Dunfee, Esq.
  • 3ernard John Barrett (Calif.
  • Bar No. 38714)
  • 23 If Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission for an ex
  • 26 13) Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunctiori.
  • EtibiB, other materials, all.
  • arguments of Plaintiffs counsel,
  • pursuant to Section 6c of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended 7 U.K. 6 13a-1
  • There is good cause to believe that Mark Weinberg ("Weinberg" or
  • "Defendant") has engaged, is engaging and is about to engage in acts and pr&tices co&&uing'
  • 14 sale, transfer, assignment, or other disposition by Defendant of assets or records unless
  • 15 immediately restrained and enjoined by Orderof this Court.
  • pursuant to Rule 26of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • 24 iepositions are consistent with the principles of Rule 26of the Federal Rules of Civil
  • 27:laims for relief, the issuance of a statutory restraining order is in the public interest.
  • 26 lisposing of any such asset except as directed by further order of the Court;
  • Ir for the benefit, of the Defendant: the balance of each such account, or a description of
  • 13 vhom such account or other asset was remitted; and the identification of any safe deposit
  • 15:he party's last known business telecopier number.
  • I 20 Louis Traeger (Calif.

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMISSION
    VIOLATION
    COMMODITY FUTURES
    TRADING
    DEFENDANT
    REGULATIONS
    WEINBERG
    PRACTICES
    INVESTORS
    CONTRACTS
    COURT
    PURSUANT
    PROVISIONS
    ENGAGING
    BUSINESS
    COMMODITY FUTURES TRADES
    PURPORTED PROFITS
    MERRILL LYNCH
    PRACTICE CONSTITUTING
    ORIGINAL INVESTMENTS
    POOL PARTICIPANTS
    CONNECTION
    REPRESENTATIONS
    PARAGRAPHS
    CALIFORNIA
    COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT
    ACTION PURSUANT
    AUTHORIZES
    ORDER THEREUNDER
    
                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    
     )
    
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission,               )     Case No.: 02-02084 RSWL (RNBx)
     )
    
                               Plaintiff, )
                                                              COMPLAINT FOR A PERMANENT
     )
                                                              INJUNCTION, OTHER EQUITABLE
    v. )
                                                              RELIEF AND CIVIL MONETARY
     )
                                                              PENALTIES
    Mark Weinberg,                                      )
     )
                                                              Hearing Date: ______________
                               Defendant. )
    
     )
                                                              Hearing Time: ______________
    
    
    
                                    I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
    
           1.  The Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C § 1 et. seq. (1994) (the "Act"),
    
    establishes a comprehensive system for regulating the purchase and sale of commodity futures
    
    contracts and options on commodity futures contracts.  This Court has jurisdiction over this
    
    action pursuant to Section 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1 (1994), which authorizes the
    
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission") to seek injunctive relief against any
    
    person whenever it shall appear to the Commission that such person has engaged, is engaging, or
    
    is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision of the Act or
    
    any rule, regulation or order thereunder.
    
           2.  Venue properly lies with the Court pursuant to Section 6c of the Act, in that the
    
    Defendant is found in, inhabits, or transacts business in this district, and the acts and practices
    
    violation of the Act have occurred, are occurring, or are about to occur within this district.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • The Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C § 1 et. seq.
  • contracts and options on commodity futures contracts.
  • action pursuant to Section 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1, which authorizes the
  • Commodity Futures Trading Commission to seek injunctive relief against any
  • any rule, regulation or order thereunder.
  • Venue properly lies with the Court pursuant to Section 6c of the Act,
  • Defendant is found in, inhabits, or transacts business in this district, and the acts and
  • violation of the Act have occurred, are occurring, or are about to occur within this district.
  • Complaint against Mark Weinberg, alleging,
  • regulations promulgated thereunder.
  • Since in or about summer 1998, Weinberg has solicited at least seven investors to
  • invest in excess of $500,000, purportedly to be used in connection with commodity futures
  • consistently refused to return the investors' original investments and purported profits to
  • By virtue of such conduct, Weinberg has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage
  • in acts and practices which violate the anti-fraud provisions of Sections 4band 4b,
  • to Japanese yen or other foreign currencies, in Metcalf's trading account at Merrill Lynch
  • Weinberg has made false and misleading representations as to the location of the investors'
  • The allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 18 are realleged and incorporated
  • Each device, scheme or artifice to defraud Pool participants, and each transaction,
  • or practice constituting a violation of an order issued under the Act and Regulations.
  •    |